Global Warming Is A Hoax

Arguer: Senator James Inhofe
Argument: Global warming is not happening (because it snowed).
Counter-Argument: Weather ≠ Climate + Data.
Arguer's Fault: Ignorance of the subject.

Dr. Powell's Analysis: https://youtu.be/FiihbpjtxYs

Follow: https://twitter.com/counterarguing
Advise: https://www.facebook.com/CounterArguments
Support: https://www.patreon.com/CounterArguments
Email: countertheargument@gmail.com

Просмотров: 69097
Длительность: 7:0
Комментарии: 1941

Тэги для этого Видео:

Найти больше видео в категории: "27"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Автор MrSirGareth ( назад)
I would like to know the "scope" of the problem this way. How much has each state of the United States changed over the past 100 years? Anyone have the data?

I don't believe anyone can take the average surface temperature of the Earth. No one has ever explained in a believable way. Too many migrating and expanding populations of thermometers, no standards of measurement, no proper geographical or temporal distributions. Too much "data fiddling," no provable error bars. etc.

James Hansen says two lonely bristle cone pine trees can measure the temperature of the entire Earth to an accuracy of 0.1 degrees C. for each of the past 5000 years. Why do we need to spend billions to figure it out now when two lonly pine trees did the job so well for us over the past 5000 years?

Peer review is a scam. Only the people doing the scaming are allowed to pass muster. We have seen this exposed in climate-gate where editors were fired for allowing non-scamers pass their "peer review"

This is bullshit passing itself off as science. We don't vote for theories. People accept theories voluntarily because they work for them. We do not need UN or the USA to politically endorse Newton's universal gravity theory. It works perfectly for me so I endorse it; that's all I need Climatologists are free to vote against Newton by a million to one; I'm not changing my mind until his theory fails to produce correct results for me.

When people mention consensus they are talking politics, not science.

Galileo failed peer review by a thousand scientists arrayed against his lone voice for a heliocentric solar system.
Galileo was smashed by peer review, so how could he be right and all of the thousands dead wrong?

Автор A Jo ( назад)
February 22, in the middle of Illinois and it's been 75 for about a week now.... we had 4 snows this winter and didn't get over 2 inches at time.

Автор Pops Wagon ( назад)
Wow are politicians are stupid

Автор Alan Meeds ( назад)
and boy oh boy his arguments prove it.

Автор Alan Meeds ( назад)
global warming haha oh thank goodness I will be dead before this battle of wills is over somehow I think earth will survive either way.

Автор Nallebjorn1 ( назад)
The same argument alarmist use all the time!

Автор DemonTrex ( назад)
Globe warming is real, why do you think club penguin is shutting down?

Автор Catalina Williams ( назад)
how ignorant can you be..ouch!!!!

Автор Astarothpool17 ( назад)
If that dipshit threw a snowball at me in some presentation just to try to prove some point, I would fucking lariat him so fucking hard HIS grand children's futures would be ruined.

Автор TheScienceGuy 34 ( назад)
It's about climate! Not your local weather forecasts. Climate is about weather patterns in large regions over 1000s of years. Weather forecasts are about predicting weather in your city/state. BIG DIFFERENCE. Also, deny all you want people. But, AVERAGE GLOBAL TEMPS ARE RISING, EVERY YEAR.

Автор Skeptical Skeksis ( назад)
Just my opinion; but a large portion the "climate deniers", including myself as I have been labeled as such, merely focus on those last two talking points. To what extent have we affected the climate, and who and tell me a solution. When I say there's no way of knowing how much, if it all, we have affected the temperature. Or if I say there's no point in investing huge amounts of tax payers money in green technology. And this one pisses people off; everybody likes to cite X amount of scientists agree.. to which I say science is not dictated by a democracy. A consensus speaks to probability not factually. Peer review papers or not. Obviously pump and gases into the atmosphere would have to have some affect. Because were modifying the ratios, cause and effect, action and reaction, basic stuff. Now I would argue that the earths temp is shockingly stable because it has a amazing ability. Hopefully you can follow me, gets hot, ice melts, more water, increased reflection, desalinization, more ice, ice melts process continues. Yes the rock freak and drastic changes in temperature to us. In the grand perspective there was not that much change in temperature. In the planet stabilized the temperature on its own. I mean just given the fact that temperatures change every year and we can't predict whether from day today. How could someone stand there and say this is what's going to happen. We don't have nearly enough data. Given all the variables and all the possibilities I would say there is almost no chance that this narrative being pitched will be correct. I'm not knocking the scientific method. but let's not pretend we know more than we actually do. And my initial skepticism respond through the median making silly correlations. Venus has lots of carbon dioxide and it's hot so if we add carbon dioxide we get hot. Wtf? Or than pointing out melting ice in the summer. Or somehow glaciers exist forever. Even just the general climate change narrative. The weather is getting crazy, there's floods and droughts tornadoes must be global warming. What the fuck are they talking about? This is odd to say but if the government wasn't pitching this climate change agenda so hard I might believe it more. I hope we all can agree that from what we know the government should stay the fuck out. Especially when these concerns directly benefit those from within as well as donors. You can smell bullshit instantly. That got really long quite the rant sorry about that.

Автор Shawn Vargas ( назад)
So there is global warming, we might have an impact. That's a different statement than we are causing global warming. Lack of critical thinking and logic. So stop dumbing down the position. I'll carpool

Автор Marta Miron ( назад)
is man made climate change war

Автор Marmocet ( назад)
On the Right, they tend to claim global warming is a hoax. On the left, they generally accept the consensus of scientists, but they also insist on addressing the issue with renewables, which have a 0% chance of actually solving the problem.

If we're going to get off dependence on fossil fuels without reducing our living standards to 18th century levels, we will have to get most of our energy from nuclear power. Renewables just won't scale. Unfortunately, the Left generally opposes nuclear power. So until both the Left and the Right budge on their wrongheaded cherished beliefs, we're not going to make any progress addressing global warming.

Автор Lumber dog ( назад)

Автор C-Bass 90 ( назад)
Suck it Liberals. Keep bitching while you control every major city (carbon emission cesspool)..fucking hypocrites

Автор James Zimmerman ( назад)
it's about funding. during the 90s many political organizations funded global warming studies and in multiple documented cases the outcomes of the studies was manipulated to show the consensus that this video demonstrates. global warming is a power grab.

Автор CyberLeaf ( назад)
I would laugh like a mother fucker if I was there and he showed me that snowball :D

Автор DCBPsquad ( назад)
The data has been tampered with

Автор Sphaggeti monster ( назад)
Global Warning is caused by isis

Автор 1400IntruderVS ( назад)
So if enough of my peers agree that aliens will come to free my soul from the confines of my earthly body if I drink Kool-aide mixed with with cyanide instead of water, it must be true?

Автор Official BLAZEMASTER05 ( назад)
if its a myth why are the polar caps are melting

Автор Akira Tamaoki ( назад)
At first I thought I would find a weirdo making a completely stupid and u researched video on how climate change is a hoax. Luckily, I found someone who I can actually agree with. Thank you for exceeding my expectations.

Автор W. Hoffman ( назад)
Stupid strawman. No serious scientist argues that a cold day proves anything about climate. Imhofer is not a scientist any more than Al Gore is a scientist, but the speaker uses his mumbo-jumbo to try to confuse people.

Central to the IPCC-sponsored AGW/ACC fright is that somehow, a kind of feedback that has so far only occurred in the imagination of model-makers will overheat the planet, drive off water, creating drought and eventually a Venus-like lifeless environment. Of course, the fact that nothing about reachable temperatures on Earth would ever allow water to reach escape velocity does not deter such fear-mongering, nor does the fact that CO2 levels have been substantially higher during both an ice age and during warm periods so warm the whole US was under an inland sea. These folks *know* it's the end of days.

First of all, the sole source of heat is the sun, and the primary source of heat retention on the planet is water vapor, which by heat capacity and mass is about 600 times more potent than CO2. It is the reason we have a habitable planet, with an average T of 59F(15C, 288K). Without it, the bb temp of our planet would be more like -2F (-17C,256K), and we would be mostly a frozen ice ball b/c of the radiation away of each day's heat gain, each night. Since we have water vapor, it doesn't happen.

Now, some evidence has been found that the average T might be 16C (60.8F), and at the same time, CO2 has been found to have risen from historical averages of ~250 ppm to perhaps 400 ppm. Although they are occurring at much the same time, no fundamental basis is known to discern cause and effect, and much data is available that in the past, whatever was the cause of heating it preceded CO2 increases. This is like people saying that rotten corpses cause illness because whenever people died and were left, their corpses rotted.

Yet again, many things have risen as the balmy average T has been in place: human population, animal population, insect population, the stock market, the numbers of computers, cell phones, refrigerators, all sorts of consumer goods, homes, cooking pots etc., etc. These are never claimed to cause AGW...not even the heat from all the fires of *any* kind and frictional losses combined could so much as tweak the global temperature. So it must be something else.

I recall a bit by Abbott and Costello, in which Lou Costello proved he wasn't right on stage with Bud Abbott, the concluding line of which was, "so if I'm not in Philadelphia and I'm not in San Francisco, and I'm not in New York, I must be somewhere else. And if I'm somewhere else, I must not be here!" Poor Bud Abbott, and poor citizens of the world who buy into that kind of reasoning.

A man from IPCC said in testimony at a Senate hearing, something about promising that they had looked "real hard" for a cause. Far as I can see, they didn't look hard enough, and like overwrought police under pressure to catch a criminal they thought they'd found someone they could "pin it on", and simply gave up the search.

I don't know *the* answer either (although natural climate variation seems quite likely, and I don't even know that it's worth much work on the basis of the failures of model predictions...another 1.8 F by 2120 just does not impress me), but I do know the IPCC accounting for CO2 is just plain poor, that correlation is not causation, and that picking a politically convenient bete noir (industrial CO2) is far more about politics than it ever was about science.

Автор RedwoodTheElf ( назад)
Now, now, get the name right, it's MAN MADE Global warming, not just Global Warming. One is a hoax, the other is a fact.

Автор Alex Dell ( назад)
I'm not denying that climate change is occuring, but I didn't realize having scientist agree on something = facts. just because scientist agree on one thing doesn't mean it's truth. facts are based on evidence. scientist have been wrong before in the past and will be wrong now and in the future.

Автор Sean Britton ( назад)
and most of those on the peer reviewed list are reviewed by only 1 or 2 people, the ones who wrote it... the rest are done by politicians...

Oh and saying that we know the exact temp from over 1000 years ago when there was no thermomoters back then to properly record the temp is rediculous...

Also, scientists have have been caught by forcing numbers to show temps rising when they havent been... they have actually leveled off for the last decade or more... so global warming is a hoax and even if america did change their ways and go totally green, the biggest polution causing nations are China and india... good luck making them change...

Автор Marc Boudreau ( назад)
Stop the chemtrails ass hole

Автор Incredible J. ( назад)
From a Christian perspective global warming isn't true. God said after the great flood, he would do nothing like that again.

Автор Austin Plays ( назад)
You're a dumbass

Автор Death spiral ( назад)

Автор Anime Waifu ( назад)
Americans... They brains will rot quicker than the sea level rising.

Автор juan ruvalcaba ( назад)
that dude are hire by Trump what a shame

Автор Sanhinda Peiris ( назад)
so you're saying we don't harm the planet?

Автор Sanhinda Peiris ( назад)

Автор Eis Geflüster ( назад)
How?... How... How did such a being made it into senate? And why do you americans let such people into senate? I could never respect someone as leader if he so obviously lacks any form of common sense.

Автор Jacob Windsor ( назад)
Oh yeah btw, it took 200 years to increase a degree and a half (this is where everyone screams in panic and horror).

Автор Justin ( назад)
This video has some of the dumbest reasoning I've ever heard.

Автор #OfficialRaccoon ( назад)
Men didn't caused this. we can't change it, just go with it.

Автор Ben Garcia ( назад)

Автор Izanagi Izanami ( назад)
its the jews. they're doing it.

damn jews.


Автор imik 86 ( назад)
this is a comment

Автор John Ibarra ( назад)
Republican alert.

Автор ApricotParrotInSpace ( назад)
well damn... if it's so obvious then why are people so confused on this subject? why is propaganda getting in the way of facts?

Автор PacificCircle1 ( назад)
Fake facts. Dump trump.

Автор General Phanter ( назад)
lol now one of those stupid 0.006% is President of U.S

Автор Micah Epp ( назад)

Автор pj Bailey ( назад)
Stupid. Just stupid.

Автор Matt10y ( назад)
Let's be real, if you think Global Warming is a hoax, you're an idiot.

Автор Vain ( назад)
Climate change isn't the same as global warming.

Автор Saben Butts ( назад)
Sorry man, trump in office now and according to him it's not real :/

Автор Lumber dog ( назад)
climate change taken off white house website tankyou trump!

Автор Grammer Police ( назад)
LOL People cry about global warming while the sahara desert just got another snowfall that is twice so far, Most of Italy is coverd in snow as well as greece, Guys global warming is a hoax it's time to prepare for the grand solar minimum it's time to move south

Автор i asimov ( назад)
The title of this video is deceptive click bait.

Автор i asimov ( назад)
Only 13,000 articles to support global warming? There were a lot more documents than that during the dark ages to support that the earth was flat and the sun orbited the earth. Consensus does not science make. Global warming? Perhaps. Manmade global warming? The mass of the totality of humankind is insufficient to affect the mighty engines of nature. Try getting a scientific opinion from someone who doesn't stand to profit from adding to the myth.

Автор Snic ( назад)
See the problem is, people fall for that kind of arguments. Visceral things, that you can actually see and touch or feel. Statistics? What is that, who cares?

Автор willhwiltjr ( назад)
if 99.99% is the highest consensus in the scientific community we need to find that one rat bastard who doesnt agree that gravity is the acting force which keeps us tethered to this godforsaken rock and enlighten him

Автор fawcems ( назад)
Global warming is not a hoax and anyone who can read should know that. (you trumpanzees are exempt) We have been warming for over ten thousand years now. Gone are the glaciers that covered the northern half of the world, and are still receding, thankfully.
 We enjoy today a much warmer climate than the early natives of this continent, altho we have lost some shoreline in the bargain. Archeology shows that sea levels have risen some thirty feet in the last ten K years, so what we are seeing is nothing new. The part about it all being man made is bullshit though. It has happened a lot over the past millions of years, so again, nothing new here except that all happened before man arrived on the scene. Mankind may be accelerating it somewhat though, except even that is unclear because man is also polluting the air, which causes sunlight to be blocked which hampers warming.
 On the days after the 9/11 attack, all aviation was grounded. No jets flying anywhere, no contrails either. An increase in global air temperature of several degrees was also noted during that time, proving that air travel does block sunlight. There are lots of other statistics to argue however you want but saying that man-made climate change is a proven fact, accepted by 97% of all scientists, is just ridiculous and laughable. 97% of government funded scientists may agree, but the rest of us are calling bullshit on that puppy...

Автор Andrew Sarchus ( назад)
You dopey fuckwit. When it's cold it's weather and when it's warm it's omg-we're-all-going-to-die climate change. But do try to keep up. Now when it snows the climate charlatans like Kevin Trenberth claim that even that is evidence of global warming. With you people the only decision to make is - are you basically honest but just very dim or are you actually twisted political scamsters? Giving you the benefit of the doubt here and you probably are just a well meaning dopey fuckwit.

Автор Michael LePere ( назад)
Yeah, you're right. A scientific consensus definitely should determine the validity of a theory. Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go back in time when gravity wasn't constant and the Earth was flat and everything revolved around us and 99.99% of scientists agree.

Автор stan klein ( назад)
This is what we elect!?

Our country is so dumbed down that clowns (and greedy) now can parade as intellects with answers to questions about which they have no understanding. And the ignorant electorate (a REAL crisis for America) accept these pontifications.

Our democratic process is fuked!

Автор godonlyknows13 ( назад)
"Global warming isnt real because I was cold today! Also, great news: world hunger is over because I just ate." - Stephen Colbert

Автор markalan1two ( назад)
doesn't the graph at 6:59 show that the temperate has been steadily decreasing for 3000 ears with a spike at the year 2000?

Автор LetterD ( назад)
SCIENCE is part of the liberal agenda! DONT TRUST!

Автор Swinde ( назад)
Another fallacy is even the idea that "snow" says ANYTHING about it being "cold".   Snow can occur anytime the surface temperature is about 40 degrees and can cover the ground if the temperature is 33 or less.  This is not all that cold.  To me COLD is like below 10 degrees Fahrenheit.  Even this in a local area says nothing about the average temperature of the planet.

Автор Spikezx7 ( назад)
I think there is a flaw in your counter argument. You brought up Dr. Powell's research into peer reviewed articles about climate change and showed how 99.99% of the articles say that climate change is real. Were you using his research and his conclusion as evidence that climate change is real? If so, isn't that a logical fallacy... specifically argumentum ad populum? Just because there is a consensus on a particular argument doesn't mean their position on that argument is true. Scientific truth is not democratic. It doesn't matter that 99.99% of people agree on a particular thing. That part of your video wouldn't hold up in an argument.

Автор Celeste Sylvia ( назад)
just in defense of Mr Imhoff, his position is not anything as described in this ignorant video.

Автор CrocBrow ( назад)
I just wanna address the validity of the assertion that a significant cause for climate change is anthropogenic: That statistic on global warming concesus is misleading. Of the research that expressed a position on global warming, 98℅ say that it's the case. However the majority of the research expressed no position.

Автор Steve Read ( назад)
Idiots like this will be the death of us all

Sceptic Steve. (btw America, this is the correct spelling of what you spell as skeptic. Just so you know what I mean).

Автор nzrene ( назад)
Your title is right. Earth mitigates itself, not only that an earthquake can spew out more co2 in hours than man can make in a life time. And the maths is wrong for the model that is used for global warming. So yeah global warming is a hoax. Earth goes through hot/cold cycles of around 12 years I believe. At the moment its colder in New Zealand on average. That's our whole country too.

Автор S Carithers ( назад)
I have an arguement against global warming, or as I call it, 'GLOW BULL WARMING'. I live in Florida, close to the ocean. Where I live, in the panhandle, near a city, Pensacola. Pensacola has a beach, on a barrier island. On that island is a very old fort. That fort was first built by the Spanish in 1540. It became known as it is today, Fort Pickens, when it was later take over by the US Army in 1842, then became Confederate in 1861 and back to the Union in 1865. According to the earliest records, there are dimensions of the grounds of the fort, which part of the fort included a stone wall that went right up to the edge of the water. Guess what, the water is STILL at the same point it was more than 100 years ago. The whole island, Santa Rosa Island, is never more than 4 to 5 feet above sea level. If there was even 0.5 inches of water increase, you would notice. But guess what, NOTHING. It is the same. OH, and BTW, the underlying geology of the area is considered to be some of the most stable on earth. None of the crazy sink holes like you find in south or central Florida. The bedrock under the area is hard limestone which is part of the same rock formation that much further north, makes up the Applacian range. It is over laid with mostly sand and some clay. The island where Fort Pickens is, it is all sand. Last I heard, sea level is the same no matter where on earth it is. I have not seen ANY rise in the ocean and NONE of the 'Chicken Little' calamities that are so screeched about in the fake media. I challenge ANY of you to come to my area and SHOW ME on the Island where Fort Pickens where the water is rising. NOT THERE. Simple NUFF.

Автор Themarine2013 ( назад)
I don't conform to either arguments on both sides of the Isle for the fact both are wrong and right. But also for the fact both try to pass bills for more tax money.

Автор jow blow ( назад)
fake news

Автор Mike D ( назад)
This video is as stupid as bringing a snowball into the senate. It completely ignores the other side of the argument with a laughable anecdote that undermines the rest of the presentation.

Автор Scott Ewing ( назад)
The same people pushing global warming, are the same people who have is nuclear weapons. It's all lies.

They are taxing and outlawing rain water collection. They are outlawing gardens, even find reasons to destroy natural habitats.

This is all Crap. It's only bad if they say so. Half the people making comments are paid shills, who don't care either way. The other half are confused, unsure, know it's a joke hoax excuse to tax people - While bankrupting big oil, and finally brainwashed sheeple.
Brainwashed sheeple who sit on the couch watching TV, believing everything it pours into their head.

The brain and human consciousness are a powerful tool. When not in control of this, it becomes a weapon against you, by those who seek to do harm, and work in secret to commit acts of evil.

These people outlaw gardens, but GLOBAL WARMING! Unlikely.
They are force feeding us Veganism, but gardens are illegal. Think about that 😃

Автор hatsjer ( назад)
A former colleague of mine at work, doesn't believe in global warming. He believes everything is just a hoax from the rich guys, so we buy and consume more stuff.
His argument? We are still recovering from the ice age.

Автор DPowered Smith ( назад)
This is hilarious because it shows that people who don't understand how something works can have such strong and open opinions about it. To deny something you don't understand is stupid, how can you say something is a lie, hoax, etc if you don't understand the reasons people think that way. That is why the whole bringing a snowball to disprove globe warming is flawed because its not as simple as walking outside and it being cold therefore its all lies

Автор Holden Thibideau ( назад)
You clearly aren't educated enough to talk about the topic of "Climate Change" (global warming) because first of all, all you did was gather information all over the internet and taking the first thing that Google spit out to you and putting it in the video. And you probably did a quick Google search on vocabulary you can use during the video to make you seem scientific, which your not. The graph you showed that usually goes by the hockey stick graph and you most likely based all you thinking off of is "false" and just a graph that was manipulated to seem as if the climate spiked tremendously because of the CO2 increase in the atmosphere. But many times over this graph has been disproven, it's not even a viable argument anymore to use it when debating on the topic of climate change. It's so easy to find a video or website that disproves of the graph, all you really need to do is google "Global warming hockey stick" and you should immediately find a source that disproves the graph. Please don't make anymore of these videos talking about Climate Change or how you like to say Global Warming, without doing more research on the topic. But if you are thinking about making another video please provide valid evidence, even though there is no such thing as "Man made Global Warming."

Автор Chill_Bill ( назад)
I just ate a cheeseburger where is world hunger?

Автор Yash Patel ( назад)
I do agree to that the human race has some part in climate change. I would not use the argument of consensus because consensus does not mean it is true. For a majority of history, there was a consensus that the earth was flat and that we should not wash our hands. There are plenty of other good argument for man-made climate change.

Автор 2upacalypsenow ( назад)
average global temp has been alot higher and alot lower than it is today. so whats the big deal exactly? it's called life..things change. should we also grovel and cry that the dinosaurs are extinct too? 50 years from now gas is gonna be like 20 bucks a liter and we'll have a whole new set of problems to worry about anyway and if that became the case then who's gonna give a fuck about global warming anymore? so why not work on fixing the things that we can fix instead of crying about the things that we can't fix? population is too high to go back now and its like -15 outside here where i live so i say we all go grab and can of aerosol and speed this process up a bit! whos with me?!?!?!??????

Автор kyle chandler ( назад)
oh wow I came to this video ready to disagree.

Автор John Smith ( назад)
All the ice at the polar ice caps melted by 2013 just like they predicted. Also polar bears are extinct because of it. Thanks "climate deniers"! Why is it called climate change now? Remember when it was only called global warming? Maybe because none of the models were correct and the satellite data shows no significant warming for the past 20 years, and the amount of ice has doubled and we have recorded polar bears in record numbers never seen before. Global warming didn't fit the narrative so now it's climate change so every weather event can be blamed on it. Where have you liberals been? We learned that the climate is always changing in the first grade 30years ago.

Автор Philip Hunter ( назад)
Plant life on earth suffers below 500 parts per million of Carbo dioxide in atmosphere. Life will become extinct at 150 or below. 1,000 to 4,000 ppm is optimum. It wont get to 4,000ppm because vegetation effeciently and quickly processes Co2. read more :

Автор Lyubo Kostadinov ( назад)
Hey man, what's the name of that song playing throughout the video?

Автор ET234 Gtt5456 ( назад)
Inoff's point is that if you live by the photo op, u die by the photo op. yes his snowball means nothing, but random hurricane or receding glacier also means nothing. world global temperature have been flat for 20 years- these stooges will say anything to keep their professor happy.The AGW scare is a 100% fraud hoax - it's all bs - there is no warming and if there was only natural could cause not man made Co2. HOAX

Автор Daniel Johnson ( назад)

Автор SaltNPepperish ( назад)
Way back in the early seventies, scientistst all swore and calculated in front page headlines and school textbooks, that we'd run out of oil by 1996 at the latest, and that acid rain would decimate all forests, and all the pollution would lead to an Ice Age.
So guess how much I care for opinions of "scientists" who don't even know how the chlorophyll cycle works and denounce CO2 as if it's some kind of poison, and woe be our children if we don't stop it with enjoying modern conveniences such as cars and electricity.
Every soft drink, every glass of beer, every bottle of champagne has up to five times its volume in CO2. Note they're not banning them.

Автор sd31263 ( назад)
Fuck that hillbilly Inhofe. He's in the pocket of the oil industry.

Автор Russ Ted Nale ( назад)
Thank God Trump won! End this stupid global warming/climate change scare.

Автор anon 39256 ( назад)
The giant white circle forgot to add all the thousands of papers written back in the 1980's warning everyone about global cooling and how we had to take action and give the climate scientists money for more research before the sky starts falling. The problem is people don't think, they only parrot what they've heard that sounds good. If you go looking for the hockystick graph in the real data, it'll vanish the harder you look, because over the last 30 thousand years the temperature has fluctuated 30 degrees in either direction, sometimes very suddenly at times. It could be the carbon cycle from plankton that's doing it, and we're one rogue meteorite or super volcano away from a global cooling disaster. The sheer volume of solar energy the earth picks up every day makes the amount of heat and smog emissions added by humans smaller than measurement error. One supervolcano puts more soot and co2 into the environment than the history of mankind, and those happen all the time.

Автор Ken Marriott ( назад)
Ok, weather is different from climate. If we can't forecast weather very well, then how are we going to forecast climate? In 2000, we were told that in as little as 10 years, snow was going to be a rare event. How's that prediction working out? Watch Al Gore's movie, it showed ice age cycles of global temperature, not very constant. Catastrophic global warming is a political consensus not a scientific consensus. Check Canadian journalist, Donna Laframboise's book. We will all agree man has some negligible effect with a 99.999 percent certainty as stated by Dr. Powell. So what!

Автор MNM mcg ( назад)
My mother says that in her day and age everyone was flipping out because they thought the next ice age was upon them, and that it heralded the world's destruction. What's that all about?

Автор Branone ( назад)
It's so distrubing to see someone who holds a pretty high-up position, present such a juvenile argument. Just goes to show how stupid you can be in the grand scheme of things but still manage to attain a high-status career.

Автор Big Nizzle ( назад)
After the East Anglia University scandal, how could anyone believe in man-made climate change?

Автор Michael Slawson ( назад)
your video presents so many things as acceptable fact

Автор SPACEGATE ( назад)
SPACEGATE has the answer, please check it out thanks.

Автор Faticate ( назад)
snowing in February 25 is out of season

Вставка видео:


Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>


Seo анализ сайта