Просмотров: 22,818,348
Добавлено: 1 месяц
Длительность: 3:56

Тэги для этого Видео:  

Найти больше видео в категории: "Howto"
Видео загрузил: YouTube Help
Показать больше видео, загруженных YouTube Help

Похожие видео:


Просмотров: 22818348
https://youtube.com/devicesupport http://m.youtube.com


Автор GlargodSr (7 месяцев)
this is one example of why I lost any shread of faith in the value of the
mythbusters' tests. They appear to be biased and purposely introduce
subtle "doomed to fail" variables in their experiments to discredit the
validity of systems that would otherwise cause harm to the wallet of those
who sign their paychecks and the owners and controllers of "the big

Автор jmpmcd (2 месяца)
myth busters are bad at their job as engineers, but good at their job
working for big business...

Автор Keola Pirata (3 месяца)
mythbusters = propaganda/newsertainment

Автор kevin smith (1 месяц)
I don't think you could run your car off water. Hydrogen sure. But with
water you're basically trying to extract the hydrogen, then combine it with
more oxygen through the intake. So you're breaking the bonds just to
reconnect them again. How could you possibly get usable energy from that?

Автор sailingsolar (3 месяца)
To everyone who claims (believes) this works, I have one question.
Why are you paying for gasoline? Someone got a gun pointed at your head or
are you just still buying gasoline because your stupid or are rich and

Why are you still paying for gas? Simple question.
Until there is a reasonable answer for above, the simple answer is it don't

Автор Ericsr48 (9 дней)
Mythbusters is a controlled opposition who's main purpose is mis and dis
info. Fuck them, they are shill scum! 

Автор David Chapman (2 месяца)
"Can a car run on hydrogen?" Oh crap...what do you think it runs on now?
It's burning a HYDROCARBON. The hydrogen gets used and the carbon goes out
the tailpipe as CO or CO2... Come on people...think.

Автор andre pata (1 месяц)
There is no explanation!! They failed because they planed to fail. I dont
watch anything from this two guys. 

Автор wined nalbat (3 месяца)
HHO cell produces HHO on demand... even if it backfire it wouldn't cause
any damage... for additional safety use flashback arrestor or have a blow
valve in the bubbler or have them both if your so paranoid... haha

Автор Kim O'Brien (2 дня)
As long as you agree that more energy is needed to produce hydrogen from
water that means you can't run a car on water alone as you can with

Even if there were no other problems the production of hydrogen from water
in any electrolytic cell constructed to your dimensions with any
electrolyte of your choicer will always have an internal resistance which
will produce heat when in operation. So more energy into produce hydrogen
and heat with less power out burning the same hydrogen or hydrogen-oxygen

As a fuel hydrogen is cleaner than hydrocarbons because when burned it
produces water only and no CO2 greenhouse gas. However its energy density
is lower than any other gas capable of combustion.

Автор Stanley Meyers (2 месяца)
yeah, the whole reason they even did the show on this was to scare people
away from it to begin with. The zionist bankers put them up to saying it
did not work.

Автор Ray Dad (5 дней)
I don't know whether these HHO devices work or not;
I do know that corporate sponsors are NOT totally cool with shows making
demonstrations which would undermine their business model.
That alone should make one skeptical about the findings of these "myth

Автор Happy Fox (1 месяц)
I believe this and other similar limitations put on the mythbusters crew,
on what they can and can not do, is the main reason why Grant quit... at
least that's what some people claim.

Автор RavenPrecept (6 месяцев)
Myth Busters often fail to make things work when they want to prove it
won't work. Obviously a car will run nicely on HHO. However conventional
science says it's impossible to draw enough power from an engine to make
it's own fuel. If a bit of HHO can be generated then this ought to make the
engine run nicer and perhaps save some fuel. The video maker says todays
HHO generators do make enough to run an engine. I would like to know more.

Автор Teddy Craig (2 месяца)
They have totally misrepresented the concept. The device was developed to
aid combustion and bump up power and aid economy. No ware does it claim
that you can run a vehicle without fuel in the tank feeding the engine.
Having said that, the device produces very little hydrogen, a single
teaspoon of petrol can produce 12 cubic metres of hydrogen gas. Whatever
the pros and cons, the idea is nice.

Автор Antonio Girley (3 месяца)
I bet The Men In Black Paid them to Do this !!!!!!!

Автор John Arias (1 месяц)
I guys if you are going to test this HHO do it properly.
I think you are specialty is blowing things

Автор Selsley01 (4 месяца)
HHO fuel cells dont work because theyre debunked by scientists owned by the
government who are payed big taxes from fossel fuels, as in the case of
stanley mayers, people say he was a fake, because they were told he was,
did these people check for themselves or just believe instantly what they
were told, what i dont understand is, if they are so ready to believe its
not true, why are they no so ready to believe its true? the fuel cell used
in this experiment was a single tube, when so many of them shown on utube
have at least 8.... the fact is, you can get hydrogen from water,
normal electrolysis is just not energy efficient, what stanley mayers did
was refine through trial and error a supply that didnt heat the water and
was more efficient at lower voltage. i know that research costs money, and
people want to get paid for their work, but we need to start freely sharing
our inventions, forget about patenting, if ou got something that will
change the world, tell the world about it for free, post it on as many
media sites as possible as well as social networks, get the plans out to
the common people and other inventors and engineers, the governments cant
disappear us all. eventually we will ask WHY we still use fossels fuels
when so many of us have built and proved these ideas to work. btw stanley
mayers died after having a toast with cranberry juice for his success with
investors, he instantly ran outside clutching his throat and vomited
exclaiming "they have poisoned me", soon after, he was dead........ his
death was investigated by the FBI.....result heart failure......hmmmmm

Автор Walker Haw (1 месяц)
myth busters deliberatley decided to disalow it to happen becase there a
threat to the elitist agenda

Автор The World is Chemistry (2 месяца)
I would like a real chemist or physicist who thinks these systems work for
the long term to answer one question for me: First Law of Thermodynamics?
How do you keep the battery charged?

Автор FERRIOT JOSETTE (9 дней)
vous sussez les mafias du petrole ainssi que votre gouvernement de merde
vous meritez des coups de pied au cul bandes de blaireaux d americains

Автор liquidshadow12 (3 месяца)
Mythbusters = NO BRAIN

Автор Prot (1 месяц)
I've never liked the mythbusters T.V. show as they had an intentional bias
one way or the other that skewed the "results" of whatever "experiments"
they investigated. Not sure if this was intentional or due to an overall
lack of understanding based on stupidity.

Stupidity argument has high levels of support when both of them were
shocked @ what occurred on 3:19 in the video above. Seriously, how could
both of these "geniuses" not realize that would happen with such a sloppy
delivery device?

Автор Jeny la loca (3 месяца)
les han pagado para que digan ke no funciona. chatarra!!!!!

valla mierda de celda, exploto por ser el motor de carburacion, ademas de
no retrasar el encendido y pufff 20 cositas mas!!!!!!

Автор Justin Smith (3 месяца)
they failed it on purpose...after so many regular episodes they seemed to
start debunking everything.

Автор wined nalbat (3 месяца)

Автор Del Bolt (3 месяца)
If you want to get the plans
to convert your car to HHO
Go to Google and Search for :
*"Top HHO Gas Car Research"*
Click the First Result (Skip the Advertisement)

Автор lmljr62 (2 месяца)
It is hilarious that these bozos get paid to "enlighten" the rest of us
poor deluded masses. To their credit, they haven't retracted their opinion
or rerun the test admitting their inadequacy to the task.Conclusion :
Mythbusters credibility - Busted!

Автор Dave Reynolds (1 месяц)
you can tell by the whole set up, their sarcastic condescending behaviour
that its deliberately meant to fail, we aint stupid you fake morons, I know
plenty of people making and running vehicles on home made hydrogen on
demand and invented storage. as for the 2 little bubbles . why don't you
all just f off and leave the worlds decent people alone, we aint having
this corporate fake controlling bull shit anymore. bollocks to ya

Автор SantinoDeluxe (2 месяца)
its important to note this is not made to run a car off but rather as a
fuel enrichment item to more completely burn what fuel you do use. if the
energy used to create the HHO was from waste heat/exhaust gas the system
would definitely increase output power. the idea is not the same as the
water fuel talked about by stanley myers/daniel dingle/joe cell (or the
like), it works on ICEs due to the fact that the ICE started as a highly
inefficient design with room for improvement and gasoline doesnt burn 100%
on its own (at Standard Temps/Pressures).

Автор ThinkSpore .com (22 часа)
yah mythbusters messed up on that one. Honestly though, given the vacuum a
carburetor produces, especially for a V8 like in the car they used, it
takes a looot of HHO volume to be able to power it through it's full range.
Also, there needs to be some kind of a regulator (similar to the gas
pedal) to keep too much or too little HHO getting to the engine, otherwise,
it can build up where it shouldn't, or, not get enough when needed.

also, don't even think about doing this on a fuel injected car unless you
have mad tuning skills and can actually write the code to program the ECU.
long story... please don't make me go into it.

Also... HHO is thinner than atomised gasoline, and the valves on a gasoline
engine need to be re-spaced, and or to be smaller, valve springs need to be
tighter, and a lot of other little things.

the worst part about HHO is that the end product is water. Do you know
what happens to an engine when you fill it up with water? they rust and
lock up. The pistons do not move the entire length of the cylinder, so,
rust will accumulate on the top portion of the cylinder, and possibly on
the head, unless it is aluminum, however, the valves are NOT aluminum....
nor are they stainless. nor are the valve guides. nor are the piston rings.
What can happen as well, when the engine turns off, and is hot, with
water vapor inside, as it cools, it causes flash rust. If a car sits for a
week or two, the cylinders will be flash rusted. this greatly reduces the
life of the engine every time you start it and the piston rings scrape all
the rust shit off. Remember. they are 4 stroke.. if ONE piston is all the
way up, there are 3,5 or 7 more that are not all the way up, or are all the
way down, filling with rust from left over water molecules.

however........ most of that stuff can be changed or modified with a large
sum of money.

with that said..................

EVERY CITY BUS WHERE I LIVE... has been powered by hydrogen for at least 20
years now..... however, they do break down all the damn time.... Not
saying hydrogen is better than HHO, i'm just saying that........ yes...
cars can run on hydrogen.... and or hho... and we've been doing it here for
a long time now, in 4 billion pound busses! or whatever they weigh.. i
don't know.

Автор Mike Warren (4 месяца)
so. does your's run off a fuel cell? because a car takes more fuel in 5
minutes, than that back contained.

Автор Alain Averhoff (2 месяца)

Автор Fridgemusa (2 месяца)
Just plain NOPE, it's not possible!!!

Автор Seka Menacerecords (6 месяцев)
I've got a much simpler explanation...You're a quack.

Автор Fistful Pennies (4 месяца)
the question is why dont mythbusters replicate stanley mayers experiment
yes he did it back in the late 70s

not their fault they dont dare
if they even try the same things will happen as when they tried to show
the new credit card rfid chips are readable at a distance and less secure
than the older cards
look up stan meyer water car folks its not a joke

Автор Crozbyguy (3 месяца)
In the End, they ran the engine on hydrogen, they just didn't know how to
make their own, and then blame it on the internet The world record for high
mileage gasoline is set at 376 miles per gallon using heated "Fuel Vapor"
back in 1973.
I've run hydrogen (and it's a lot of cleaning up plates) for seven
years, Don't get upset, but there are better solutions than adding HHO to a
gasoline engine system. The trick is making gasoline droplets into a true
"Clear Vapor" prior to engine ingestion.
The record was set by Shell Oil engineers and is well documented. HHO is
still a temporary solution for diesel systems, but in the end fuel cells
will probably run on dark energy or magnetics.

Автор Christo Whyno (4 месяца)
mythbusters = 2 brightly lit puppets

hopefully one doesnt say ok this french painter and his easily excitable
son, who wont take his meds, cant achieve success therefore by reason of
deduction it cant be done. Oh you internet hoaksters! On Jaime on Adam, to
the next buster of mythological hope for human suffering and slaveship. 

Автор Ramonsoler (3 месяца)
The truth is, MB's didn't prove that HHO doesn't work. They proved, that
the downloaded version from the internet of HHO wet cell plan doesn't work.
They did however prove the point, that you CAN run a car on pure hydrogen,
provided, that you have enough of it available and they also inadvertently
pointed out, that you need a safe and proper set up to be installed on your
car, to avoid any unwanted explosions and/or damage.

Автор micheals1992 (2 месяца)
If you understand the basics of physics you would know that these systems
are impossible anyway... it requires much more energy to produce hydrogen
then you gain from burning the hydrogen.

electrolysis is only about 65% efficient. It gets even uglier when you
combust the hydrogen... you only get back about 20% of the energy stored in
the hydrogen, the rest is converted into heat. If you dedicated 100 Watts
to producing hydrogen and then burn't it in the engine it would only
produce 13 Watts of usable energy, which means you'd loose 87 Watts of

Автор adrian padure (3 месяца)
,FIND A REAL JOB becouse the BIG OIL soon couldn't pay you anymore

Автор orsanjethro . (6 месяцев)
They 'failed' because they are paid to fail, which is to discourage others.

Автор Bob Kemper (1 год)
Keep researching, these guys appear to me, as paid stooges for the oil
cartel's. It's obvious if you watch enough videos, you'll find authentic
ways explained on how to increase your fuel mileage using hydrogen gas
generated by properly built generating cells. I wouldn't buy
any blue print plans though, because there are many charlatans after your
hard earned dollars.

Автор Bill Blakely (1 месяц)
Mythbusters have their own agenda.

Автор ccryder1149 (7 месяцев)
So, when you run current through a solution of sodium bicarbonate and water
you get virtually no hydrogen but you do get a lot of carbon dioxide.
Somehow I don't think that carbon dioxide is very helpful in getting an
engine to operate. But, let us visit HHO Fairy Tale Land and pretend that
the bag actually was full of HHO. In just one revolution of a 5 liter
engine, the entire bag would be empty. So, as it took five minutes to
produce enough HHO for a single revolution of the crankshaft, how
many years would it take to produce enough HHO for a trip to Granma's

Автор Ky Win (24 дня)
the valve timing of gas engines do not work with hydrogen. Hence the back
fire. You need a different camshaft design to run hydrogen.

Автор john renney (4 месяца)
Cool more

Автор Alcyone89 (7 месяцев)
paid tv trolls! insulting people's ingenuity

Вставка видео:


Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>


Seo анализ сайта