Accelerating Mazda RX-8 0-100 km/h

Accelerating a Mazda RX-8 during a test drive from 0 to 100 km/h and up to 140..

Nice car..

Просмотров: 259480
Длительность: 0:20
Комментарии: 112

Тэги для этого Видео:

Найти больше видео в категории: "2"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Автор Michael Vezina ( назад)
lol turbocharge that shit dude

Автор julio bayany galvan benitez ( назад)
I'm selling my mazda 3 and buy a rx8 is perfect

Автор Jimmy Tan ( назад)
8 sec 0-100kmh...

Автор Figo John ( назад)
wow thats slow

Автор Michael Aristide ( назад)
Yes. In nominal engine displacement 1.3L is correct. However, in effective
displacement (which takes frequency of power cycles in account) the nominal
displacement is multiplied by 2 which results in 2.6 liters. Why multiply
by two? Because the Wankel rotary has twice the number of power cycles
relative to its displacement compared to a reciprocating engine. Both
rotors go through a power cycle for every single e-shaft revolution,
compared to once every two crank revs in a recip. Exactly double.

Автор Jakob Woods ( назад)
my commodore is faster than that 

Автор Trichome Farmer ( назад)
ROFL 8 seconds flat

Автор Braden Huffman ( назад)
Its actually 660cc x 2 = 1.3L 

Автор funkydonkey11051989 ( назад)
i hate that annoying beep sound for upshifting >.>

Автор pacrat90 ( назад)
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective, you cant compare engine
displacement between piston and rotary engines like that.

Автор Katalina Kaval ( назад)
My Corsa 1.4 goes 0-100 just as fast -.-

Автор veljkoblv (553 года назад)
Man, it is 1.3 l engine, it counts like 2.6 because of its unfair power
compared to piston engines.

Автор Assad Ali ( назад)
about 8 sec to 100? Something must be wrong i'd expect it to be faster than

Автор Unlimited Motorsport & Gaming ( назад)
stop saying stupid stuff like it equals to 2.6. This shit is 1.3, that's
why it can only produce around 160 of torque. saying V6 LoL

Автор SaintsRow1177 ( назад)
I counted 8.5

Автор bojana dakskofler ( назад)
sry but i have to correct you. the engine is a 1.3, period. the rule to
multiply the displacement x2 is there just to give the otto engines a
fighting chance in bhp comparrison and similar comparisons. for example:
the honda s2000 produces 120bhp/l, and is one of the best N/A engines, but
the rx8 produces 177bhp/l the rotary only has 2 problems: 1:low torque, but
can be solved by a turbo 2:drinks a LOT of fuel

Автор Ben Power ( назад)
8 sec

Автор Lyubomir Harizanov ( назад)
@mrflipydip12 yeah right, and if you squeeze it just a little more, it will
do 100 in 2 seconds and will beat a Veyron...It does 0-100 in 6,2 seconds
WITH trashing. Let's say factory figures are conservative, so 6 in reality.
And that's it. People around here are not as dumb as you might think,
trashing a car won't bring it two seconds below factory figures, otherwise
why would people give XX.XXX more money to get a car in the four-seconds

Автор sTTu ( назад)
@mrflipydip12 Huh dude? He starts on ONE second and hits 100 at TEN
seconds. That makes NINE seconds. EVEN if you are kind and give him a
rolling start from 2 seconds, that's still 8 0-100kph - which (imho) for a
sports car is a tad on the sloooow side!!

Автор Mario sp ( назад)
@19danflo and why is not impressive? rx8 is the funniest car to drive from
the above you mentioned and a better car overall. its driving feel its

Автор Mario sp ( назад)
bad start

Автор Frank Decenzo ( назад)
@greenmadrid1000 but if u compare prices, the rx8 is a better car

Автор Theo Scheepers ( назад)
looooooool 0-100 in 9 seconds? thats pretty damn slow

Автор Kayanat Sarkar ( назад)
Mitsubishi lancer evolution x is better

Автор gohabsgo1fan ( назад)
this is gonna be my first car idc bout gass or oil i want this car !! 

Автор PensandSteelersrock ( назад)
boy it is definatley not the fastest thing in the world, but it does sound

Автор extremepsychogamer ( назад)
@DK99824 wtf are you talking about? this rx8 has a 1.3L, thats right, 1.3 L
rotary engine that produces 230 HP. The 350z has a 3.5 L V6 and only
produces about 300 HP

Автор APO6 ( назад)
@DK99824 while the engine may be lighter than cars of it's class, that
advantage still doesn't make up for the lack of power and torque. if you
look at the RX8's supposed rival the 350Z, the 350 is heavier overall but
still walks the RX8 on straights because it has the torque. In the handling
aspect, because the RX8 is lighter, it is better than a 350. not bashing
the RX8. I'm just saying an 8 isn't meant for a straight line.

Автор APO6 ( назад)
@DK99824 rx8s aren't that light.

Автор poutwa arxidia ( назад)
this car is very slow for 240hp... but cause it gots 9.300 rpm, can get
really good tuning! stock rx8 is a shit, tuned is much better than other
tuned cars!

Автор Domagoj176 ( назад)
i got mazda 323f (protage5) 2001 jear and it has 1,4ccm 89 hp, and 0-100
its about 9.9 sec dam its soo good :D XD

Автор JAMinguitardude1 ( назад)
@19danflo you are right about it not being a piston engine, however, you
are wrong about the displacement, since its a rotary, and not a piston, you
cant get an approx displacement conversion. people always say, noooo you
have to multiply by 2, or 3. fact is that its a 1.3, and people need to
find an excuse to come up with after they get passed by one. last time i
checked a 6 litre v8 doesnt equal a 3 litre rotary...

Автор Gorax90 ( назад)
Nice, fast, gorgeous looking car. Shame it sounds like a 1.25 fiesta.

Автор Zero Relativity ( назад)
crap that haters, i just love this car. mazda rx-8. <3

Автор Andrewh1994 ( назад)
@Sorayan13 yea that's probably true!

Автор Sorayan13 ( назад)
@bertrab87 Ur mums ass is so big, not only a 1.3 rotary engine would fit
in, a whole RX8 would!

Автор CRAZYSTOO ( назад)
i wish people would stop repeating obvious facts about rotaries on every
rotary video.

Автор Tod Hunter ( назад)
title should be "Accelerating Mazda RX-8 0-139km/h 

Автор Andrewh1994 (307 лет назад)
my microwave has more torque..

Автор Adam ZarZar ( назад)
@mattc867 Yeah, but I just know within a day of owning one i'll turn the
car on and off and flood the engine because I don't think about that stuff.
Plus the gas mileage is not great for me. I'd love to own one though.

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
@HBXTQ1990 Oh yeah, the Z is VERY rough.. but that's ok, too. It has a
different character. But in any case it cannot get an RX8 on a twisty road.
Thats one thing that makes the RX8 so fun and yes: furthermore it's quite
comfortable and the interior is way better and more beautiful than in the
350Z. Anyways: I really like both cars.

Автор KimJongIlLover ( назад)
@vortex3k you know what you are talking about. I have met a lot of people
saying the RX-8 is too slow and they would rather have a 350z. Of course
the 350z is a nice car too, but boy is it hard... the rx-8's suspension is
really really soft for a sports car because of its low centre of gravity. I
also drive an S2000 and that similar to the 350z has more punch but it sure
is uncomfortable to drive compared to the rx-8 :D And due to its suspension
and COG you can corner like a beast with it :)

Автор Pandemonium Lig ( назад)
@vortex3k The red color tuned RX-8 is not here now :-( and I dont saw his
owner to ask to him the power of engine and if I could take photos to show
it to you :-( Arfff so, thanks for my Clio 2 RS1 :-) Sure it is a little
rocket ^^ I beging any little mods to increase the engine power to
178-180hp now at 192-200hp With its light weight, 930kg about (reservoir
empty) it is and it will be more a nice ratio "Weight / Power" who give a
funny "little" sport car to drive know me ^^ ;-)

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
@cumbas Oh yes, it is a great car indeed. I wouldn't want to own one
though, but it IS a very fun car. BTW: i love the RS clios :D all renault
RS models are astonishing! just ordered a megane 3 rs 250 last month :)
Uhm.. good question. I think there are only slight differences in the
interior (other seats) and a rev counter to 10k rpm for the 231hp model,
also 5 vs 6 speed gearbox and AFAIK only the 231hp version has headlight

Автор Pandemonium Lig ( назад)
@cumbas ah OK ^^ It is a very beautiful car and an engine Strange
coincidence but in this moment on parking lot in front of my apartment just
to the right of my car ^^ (Sport Clio 2 RS1 Renault) it has of oone RX-8
red color and slightly tuned, it is very beautiful. How to know by seeing
it if it is the 192 or the 231hp??

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
@cumbas It's the 231hp version.

Автор Pandemonium Lig ( назад)
@cumbas Actually is it the 192 or the 231hp version there ?

Автор Pandemonium Lig ( назад)
@Bibazavr 2x 1.3L so --> 220hp /2 = 110hp by rotor 1.3L an not 220hp it is
less taht you said but very nice always ^^ :-) & I like this car also :-)

Автор Callan Klimtschuck ( назад)
@vortex3k Amen to that!

Автор Adam ZarZar ( назад)
I'd love one of these but the heavy problems with it scares me...

Автор passion:driving (1539 лет назад)
@cal04450 That's because most people only judge sports cars in terms of
acceleration, 0-60, top speed and so on. But that's just one side.. the
most important part of a sports car is how it corner's, how it handles and
how it allows the driver to position it into a corner to achieve maximum
speed. Corners are what separates the boys from men and the powerful cars
from fast cars.

Автор Callan Klimtschuck ( назад)
great job. I love my rotary... fast car, especially around the corners... i
just hate how everyone compares their car to mine with 0-60 times!! If they
could just understand that this car is fast in its own right... i really
think its underrated as a sports car! 

Автор ZanarSargamathA ( назад)
@MultiGrzenio learn to count

Автор Ahmed Siddiqi ( назад)
my civic vtec gives me 120kph on the second gear. accelerates to 100 in
approx. 8 seconds

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
@TCoops I got the concept of high-rev cars ;) I just messed up with that
start. And yes.. it's really fun to drive. Much more corner-friendly than a

Автор T Coops ( назад)
Neat car too. Driving is more than just dragging in a straight line(yawn),
so arguing about microseconds on 0-100 times just becomes redundant. This
thing looks great to corner! Really want to test one out

Автор T Coops ( назад)
rev higher before slipping off the clutch, feed the power on while
maintaining high revs (feather it). Very important for little engines or
engines lacking torque. You totally "bogged down" on that takeoff and could
have launched faster. A v-8 it aint, you really gotta peg that narrow power
band. That's the beauty of having a clutch- full utilization and control of
the power delivery. Are motorcyclists the only people who get this concept?

Автор grey91pl ( назад)
very bad start and shifting

Автор Marc-André Blais ( назад)
This is in Km/h... it's between 6.5 and 7 seconds 0-100.

Автор dan mohr ( назад)
@Romanno14 it was 100 km/h read the description. 100 km/h is the same as 60

Автор Saajoh0783 ( назад)
@SG02JATT 0-60 KM/H not mph

Автор upbeatmantis86 ( назад)
there goes 1 liter of fuel.. XD

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
@SG02JATT its kph, not mph :) I think it has been a 2008 RX-8, but I'm not
sure, it wasn't mine.

Автор Jose Escauriza ( назад)
@CougarChile pres the DSC buton 8 secons... and than is realy disengage..

Автор versus4582 ( назад)
Dude come 9+ seconds to reach 100!!!!!????????? Revved it or Not you NEED

Автор Dragos Adrian ( назад)
it`s more lower than an dacia logan 1.6 16v.T

Автор abodigibine69 ( назад)
@vortex3k yeah bruz, rotary, rev the fuck out of it haha

Автор versus4582 ( назад)
You need some serious practice ...

Автор cbstrei108 ( назад)
i have a celica gt-s and i love it i also like the rx-8. but they are no
faster then the celicas. my brother just bought one... havent seen it yet.
what you thinkg would win in a race?

Автор Billllk ( назад)
yeah i agree but u don't compare these cars with mine!U see VW group got
supercharged engines only Golf,Scirocco,Tiguan etc and Audi A5 A4 A3
supercharged too it's easy thing for me to modify my engine by adding turbo
but that's not the point.Besides Nissan GT-R beats 'em all having 1/3 the

Автор Billllk ( назад)
LF-A say something?

Автор Billllk ( назад)
noone can beat my celica ts 0-100 6.2 secs!!!Check out my video Toyota
Celica sti Vouliagmemis and see what happens in Greece!Celica TS rules!!!

Автор kurec86 ( назад)
i have the Vector 2.0T 210Hp...

Автор Francisco Jiménez ( назад)
@vortex3k Ahh, ok, sorry mate ;) I had the luck to test a friend's RX8 on a
track, and is really awesome, hoping buy my own soon :P

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
I've already written it so many times: traction control has been disabled,
but an RX8 requires 6.000rpm+ to have a good start.. I simply reved not
enough ;)

Автор Francisco Jiménez ( назад)
He must disengage the traccion control, that's the problem.

Автор krilaztomasz ( назад)
??? 8 sec ? my peugeot 306 xsi 2.0 136HP have the same time ..

Автор l2EDeSTiS ( назад)
@kurec86 What kind of saab you have and how many kw?

Автор APO6 ( назад)
the fact is that stock rotaries lack low rev power and torque which is why
they can't launch like other cars. RX8s are better cornering cars than
straight line cars.

Автор kurec86 ( назад)
OMG....both cars are slow...9 sec from 0-60Mph...thats slow man...my fukin
Saab goes 7.4 from 0-60...and its old its 2003...thats slow man...sorry

Автор Hajduk ( назад)
yeh is that in the states? they are the same in the UK. In New Zealand they
don't tax on your enigine? you pay for in insurance for owning a 'sports
car' though

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
PS: oversaw the e89. If not yet been sitting in a e89 or driving one, so I
cannot say something about it ;)

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
6,5 feet. And I really don't feel comfortable in a Z4 because the
wind-shield's top is at my eyes height ;) It's a great car though but a bit
too small for me. My smart roadster offers a bit more space but is of
course not as luxury and valuable as the z4.

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
As already said: the car was nearly factory new and my start was shitty ;)
But the main advantage to an z4 is: I do fit into the RX8 whilst driving in
a Z4 is like sardins in a can ;-) And I drive a smart roadster :P

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
So, it not rated as 2.6 "just because 231bhp from a 1.3 are not the norm".
Otherwise you would have to say a turbo charged engine with 1.6l and 300bhp
would need to be rated as a 3.0l "just because 300bhp are not normal for a
1.6l". Rated as 2.6 is just based on the fact that 2.6 is the cylinder
capacity equivalent to the 1.3l rotary. But as already mentioned, in
Germany it will be rated based on it's weight, because of the fact, that
there is no cylinder capacity.

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
Well.. it's actually not the same in Germany :D Since it is a rotary and
therefore actually has no cylinder capacity (which cars in Germany are
being taxed by) it is actually being taxed as a truck. That means it will
be taxed on it's weight, so only double as high taxes as my smart :D Thats
awesome! Anyhow: because it has no cylinder capacity (because there are no
cylinders), it is rated as 2.6l in other countries.

Автор Hajduk ( назад)
more like a 2.6 i read.

Автор DruidB19 ( назад)
Actually its worse on fuel than a modern 3.9l v6... When you compare it to
piston engines its comparable to a 2.6L 4cyl due to its combustion cycle..
But the total volume is 3.9L.. The reason posts like mine get thumbs down
is that many people who love the Rotary don't like to hear the actual facts
and prefer to pretend its a 1.3.. just like Mazda has been getting away
with for years..

Автор Bibazavr ( назад)
Why would i give you thumbs down if you just told me new interesting
information ? So it drains fuel as fast as 3.9 L ?

Автор DruidB19 ( назад)
If you determine the size of the rotary with the same formula used to
determine the size of your polo's engine, you will find that the rotary is
actualy a 3.9L engine.. and before you give me a thumbs down go do some
research of your own.

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
Don't forget, the car was completely new. It was only about 400km old, so
not yet the whole performance available.

Автор kou ouhiro ( назад)
too slow the shifting

Автор Bibazavr ( назад)
Great car . 1.3 and so much 220+ hp . My polo classic has 1.4 and it gives
only 65. Go Wankel engine.

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
Thanks mate! ;) Another nice clean launch: O6yISw5E5LQ

Автор ambientflier ( назад)
Probably because it's only quick if you redline it, which means that unless
you're driving it very hard, it's not going to feel quick. It does lack
torque, however, it's still a nice car.

Автор upbeatmantis86 ( назад)
i dont know why many car mag reviews say this car lacks torque/power...
seems fast enough for me... 8.6 secs is pretty fast (0-100kmph)...

Автор Chris Biz ( назад)
The video ID to watch is "ztSqBWlbClw". Just add that to the end of a
youtube video link. I forgot that URLs can't be posted in comments.

Автор Chris Biz ( назад)
Here is a good video demonstrating what I mean if my comment was not clear
to some people. Since it is in Japanese, let me translate what each run is.
1st run - DSC on 2nd run - DSC off by just pressing the button (You can see
it kick on as soon as he hits the brakes, the steering wheel snaps to the
right) 3rd run- DSC off by holding the button for 7 seconds 4th run -
Showing the difference in suspension between a normal RX8 and a Mazdaspeed
RX8 (Spec-A) with DSC switched off entirely.

Автор passion:driving ( назад)
Thanks for pointing this out!

Автор Chris Biz ( назад)
Pressing the button disables traction control and some of the DSC
functions. This will allow you to do burn outs and drift the car. If you
hold the button for 7 seconds, it will completely turn off DSC. Without
holding the button, DSC will kick on when you start sliding with the brakes
applied, but will keep it off if you slide with the gas on (drifting) In
this video, the guy had TC off. If it was on, you would see the TC symbol
flash above the tach when his tires started spinning at launch.

Вставка видео:


Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>


Seo анализ сайта