Видео


USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE*



remade this, my other Iowa vs Yamato video kind of sucked, let me know what you think of this and and subscribe


Просмотров: 267419
Добавлено:
Длительность: 10:22
Комментарии: 2831

Тэги для этого Видео:



Найти больше видео в категории: "22"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Комментарии:

Автор 1974Teebone ( назад)
That same fatal flaw that sunk the real Yamato. Weakly protected magazine
under the #2 main cannon. As powerful as the IJN was it seems odd such a
massive flaw would make it to production. That and someone mentioned a real
Iwoa commander would never get that close: Yamato had 2 secondary guns. 2.
The Mighty Mo had 7 on each side. Getting that close was the only way she
could topple the Yamato had they ever faced 1v1. Fortunately the Mo had the
fastest engines of all ships in that class and could do just that.

Автор Al Morales ( назад)
Why iowa vs yamato
You should do montana vs yamato

Автор Giovanni Santoni ( назад)
The yomato should have won against the USS iowa, the yomato was better. The
iowa won cause of its american pride bullshit. such bullshit.

Автор Alejandro Sola Carrion ( назад)
siempre tienen k ganar los putos americanos, me cago en dios
el yamato era mucho mejor k el otro

Автор destroyer2 explosive ( назад)
that wa svery close the yamato almost destroyed them if the general
sneaked attacked it will be easier for ioiwa

Автор m aulia akbar ( назад)
It looks like iowa was yousing the colrodo guns not the 16 inc guns

Автор Jason C ( назад)
the Iowa could only fire starboard. In the video she's firing from her port
side.

Автор Härskiboy1803 ( назад)
Yamato's armor was designed to resist its own 46cm guns from
20 000 m away


Автор 小西健太 ( назад)
やはり、大和が負けたか。

Автор Wanda Bradley ( назад)
Witch is not very long range

Автор Wanda Bradley ( назад)
Well the uss iowa had a better secondary battery

Автор GSthen ( назад)
What a bunch of propaganda.

Автор Wong wan chung ( назад)
Todays' Iowa Class Battleships are Fitted with Deadlier Anti-ship Missiles
like Harpoons and the Tomahawk Cruise Missile and Fire 1 Harpoon Missile
and 1 Tomahawk Cruise Missile at Yamato at Ranges Far Beyond 80 Kilometers
Once locked-on by the Fire Control Radars onto Yamato as seen on this
Demonstration and the Missiles with Definitely Sink Yamato at her Weakest
Armor Plating above the Command Structure Funnel and the 3rd 18-Inch Turret
of Yamato and Capsized her.

Автор Maurice Johnson ( назад)
My name is maurice johnson retired ship building here in Baltimore but no
more I love the work as welder my father also was a welder 40 years working
in ship building I made up my mind at age 12 to work in in ship building it
was a good life

Автор kurakensama ( назад)
Well, Yamato and company had troubles sinking tin cans...

Автор onlythewise1 ( назад)
rememeber the battleships had to fit in the panama canal two feet was all
that was left on the Iowa bb61

Автор Wanda Bradley ( назад)
Idontudhfxj

Автор Flyz it Dies ( назад)
Ah Battleships... The Navy's punching bag 

Автор S Van Gaal ( назад)
What game is this?

Автор Rodrigo Gabriel Vargas ( назад)
Montana is stronger than yamato class


Автор Alexius Nemo ( назад)
If Admiral Halsey hadn't left the landing fleet uncovered to chase after
Japanese "bait" force there might have been a mano y mano Battleship fight
between the Yamato & Iowa class battleships

Автор Alexius Nemo ( назад)
Battleship were the centerpiece of tasks forces. No battleship would fight
alone. The US had much more "at sea time" which translates to a better
working crew. Consider how poorly the Yamato was handled during the Battle
of the San Bernardino Straight. (Battle of the Leyte Gulf) If the IJN task
force had been better handled/led it should have been a devastating US
defeat. Instead it ending up being a US victory.

Автор Gangsta Pikachu ( назад)
The Yamato had no radar so the Guns weren't accurate the Iowa had radar so
they could pin point accuracy and Iowa had speed.

Автор COCKROACH ( назад)
murica fuck yeah

Автор Exilninja ( назад)
Not sure how the Iowa would win here. Both ships are close enough that
their shells will smash through each others armour, but Yamato's shells are
larger and have superior penetration. The Iowa has speed and accuracy on
her side, but at this range I'd find it hard to believe that the Yamato's
gunners would miss when their target is in plain sight. Yamato fires a
heavier broadside too.

If the ships were engaging each other at range, it would be a different
story.

Автор judd49th ( назад)
ssmusic214: You may not know the man, but I might, so pipe down.

Автор Nicephore Phocas ( назад)
Fucking american Bullshit !!

The IJN Yamato & Mushashi were the strongest Battleship ever built at
that time , not even the Bismarck was a good Match against the YAMATO !!

All shows against any IJN battleships are a loser against any allies ship

De la pure crap.

Review your history book before making any reconstitution realistic ??!!

Автор surearrow ( назад)
>>-----------------> UnknownPerson onGoogle <---------------<< HEY
JERKO! Americans have reasons to call HMS hood a battleship! Hood was the
largest ship in the Royal Navy when completed; thanks to her great
displacement, in theory she combined the firepower and armour of a
battleship with the speed of a battlecruiser, causing some to refer to her
as a fast battleship. Wiki states, "Battlecruisers served in the navies of
Britain, Germany, the Ottoman Empire, Australia and Japan during World War
I. By the end of the war (WWI), capital ship design had developed with
battleships becoming faster and battlecruisers becoming more heavily
armoured, blurring the distinction between a battlecruiser and a fast
battleship. The Washington Naval Treaty, which limited capital ship
construction from 1922 onwards, treated battleships and battlecruisers
identically, and the new generation of battlecruisers planned was scrapped
under the terms of the treaty."

Автор surearrow (236 лет назад)
>>-------------------> The real U.S. Commander would never get so
close. Placing his vessle at a horrible disadvantage and not using the
Iowa's strengths. American fire control and radar on the BB Iowa was
light years beyond anything in the IJN, and we knew this at the time. The
Iowa could make multiple hits a on a dime, and give you nice cents change.

Автор Jade West ( назад)
It looks like a Montana ship because usually lowa class only carry
helicopters Montana carry plane

Автор Robert Cole ( назад)
USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE*: https://youtu.be/JSytv7RABDc

Автор jawedz ( назад)
greetings from japan. there is a discussion and some boasting bellow about
a radar system of iowa class. fyi, yamato class was fitted with a radar
system circa 1943. though it might be less reliable and capable than an
american radar, it was used in the battle of layte gulf when yamato's
46cm-18in gun hit an american light aircraft carrier.

Автор joekidd1992 ( назад)
America wins again!!!

Автор Isoruku Yamamoto ( назад)
How about IJN A-150(Super Yamato) vs Iowa >:3

Автор Kratons ( назад)
Ohhhhh that Shell-fly-by sound.........

Автор Ender bomb ( назад)
All hail the mighty Yamato. Like if you agree.


Автор 98755785a ( назад)
The bottom line is that, after 1943 or so, having the world's best optical
fire-control systems was largely irrelevant. The night battle between
Washington and Kirishima near Savo pretty much settled the point; good
radar usually beats good optics in a stand-up fight. And the radar used by
Washington off of Guadalcanal was not as good as the sets fitted aboard
Iowa.6
Then there's the fact that all radar fire-control is not created equal.
Radar operating at meter or decimeter wavelengths is useful for ranging,
but lacks the angular accuracy necessary for training. In practical terms,
this means that a decimetric set can develop a range solution via radar,
but must rely on an optical director to supply training information for the
battery. This hybrid fire-control solution is, of course, limited by the
quality of the optics available, and also by the visual horizon (which is
closer than the radar horizon), and weather conditions. Only with the
advent of 10cm and (later) 3cm wavelength sets was true 'blindfire' radar
fire-control achievable, wherein the firing ship need never come into
visual range of the opposing vessel. The Germans, Japanese, and Italians
never developed sets of this capability (both the Japanese (despite its
10cm wavelength) and German sets were usable for fire control against a
battleship-sized target only out to a range of about 27,000 yards.) The
bottom line is, then, that the Allied vessels, and particularly Iowa and
South Dakota, would enjoy an enormous advantage in gunfire control over
their adversaries. She would have the ability to lob shells over the visual
horizon, and would also perform better in complete darkness or adverse
weather conditions.

The final adjusted rating also reflects the fact that American FC systems
employed by far the most advanced stable vertical elements in the world. In
practical terms, this meant that American vessels could keep a solution on
a target even when performing radical maneuvers. In 1945 test, an American
battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant solution
even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by
back-to-back 100-degree turns.7 This was a much better performance than
other contemporary systems, and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical
advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their
opponents could only do one or the other.

Автор OMGDUDEWTH ( назад)
iowa has superior speed and more accurate guns. at the ranges the us will
be shooting at the yamato will be guessing at best

and no dont gimme the longer range shit. japnese fire control/radar has no
hope of actually hitting things close to the max range of those 18 inches

Автор seimeisen mijikai ( назад)
YAMATO vs BISMARCK Please.

Автор ssmusic214 ( назад)
IJN Yamato 40 cm/45 Type 94 naval gun:

Effective firing range 25 km (16 mi)
Maximum firing range 42 km (26 mi) at 45° elevation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/40_cm/45_Type_94_naval_gun

USS Iowa 16"/50 caliber Mark 7 gun:

Maximum firing range 23.64 mi (38 km)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16%22/50_caliber_Mark_7_gun

Автор さんたか ( назад)
色々おかしい所が満載なので書かせてもらおう。

1)大和の火力、防御力及びアイオワの火力、防御力。
戦艦は自分の主砲火力に耐えれるように設計されている。(どの国でも基本的に同じ)つまり大和のバイタルパート(主砲塔、弾薬庫、缶室ect)は46cm砲の直撃に耐えられるようにできている。(数発同箇所に被弾すればその限りではない)
しかしアイオワの主砲は40.6cmにもかかわらず、大和主砲塔天蓋部分及び煙突部分に1発ずつ命中しただけで貫通している。しかも艦上部に被弾したはずが、なぜか艦首喫水線下(水面の下)から浸水しそのまま沈没。(キングストン弁でも開けたのかな?艦首にはないけど)
それに対しアイオワはおそらく右喫水線下に大和主砲が直撃し傾斜しているにも関わらず主砲を発射、命中させている。艦が傾斜した状態で撃っても基本的に命中しないし、むしろ傾斜が一定を超えると主砲を発射できない。(46cm砲弾が喫水線下に命中したときにアイオワの装甲であの程度の傾斜ですむのかも疑問だが)

2)交戦距離が近すぎること。
昼間の戦艦同士の砲戦でこれほど近距離での砲戦はまず発生しない。(しかもアイオワはレーダー管制射撃で視界外から撃てる。)
副砲や両用砲が届く距離は近すぎる。(見張りは寝てたのかな?)

以上のことからこの動画はただアイオワを格好よく勝たせたいが為の公平さも何もない動画だと思われる。(アイオワの利点すら帳消しにしている。)
もちろん公平に戦った場合もアイオワに全く勝目がないと言うことではないが(主砲の連射速度はアイオワの方が速い)、この動画の通りに大和が被弾した場合、主砲塔は一撃で破壊されることはないし、煙突根元は火災が発生するだけに留まる可能性が高い。(仮に動画の通りに破壊されても沈没はしないが。)

アイオワが大和に勝つ方法があるとすれば、レーダー管制射撃による遠距離射撃と大和よりも優れた発射間隔により、大和が射撃できる距離に入る前に畳み掛ける事ではないだろうか?
(大和はレーダー管制射撃ができないため、「敵の射程外から一方的に撃破する」と言う46cm砲の戦略は破綻している。)

Автор Shannon Mcvey ( назад)
John McGlan - The Iowas were NOT longer than the Yamatos. NOR were they
designed to destroy the Yamatos. The Iowas were well under construction
before ANYONE outside the japanese high command even knew that the Yamatos
had even been DESIGNED, let alone what they were capable of. You are
thinking of the MONTANA class ships which were still under construction
when the Yamato and Musashi were finally sunk by aircraft. The Yamato had
radar like the Iowa, and the Yamato's guns outranged the Iowas by almost 5
nautical miles. She also had nearly identical speed. If these two
behemoths had ever had the misfortune to meet on the high seas, in good
weather, the Iowa would have been on the bottom likely before she ever had
a chance to fire a shot.

Автор Gary Sellars ( назад)
Amerikkkan shit...

Автор John McGlannan - Realtor ( назад)
The USS Iowa was longer then the yamato also it depends about takitiks and
Iowa could use AP or HE rounds also Iowa could use speed and munufrubilty
to circle and Iowa was made to destroy the yamato.

Автор DoubleMrE ( назад)
Since larger guns have longer range, I think its only common sense that
Yamato could've beaten an Iowa class in a one-on-one fight if it could stay
beyond their range, and within their own. But that would be difficult,
given the Iowa's greater speed. The fact is that either ships guns were
powerful enough to sink the other regardless of both ships armor
protection. I think the most important factor would be the experience of
the officers and crews. Of course, a lucky hit on a magazine by either side
would be doom for the other.

The USN had plans in the works to build an even bigger class than the
Iowas. The 'Montana' class would've equaled the Yamato class in size,
though they would've still been armed with 16" guns (but would've had 12 in
four turrets as opposed to the Iowas with 9 guns in three turrets).

Автор 新井利昌 ( назад)
Both battle ships are so beautiful! And so are the flag of the rising sun
and the stars and strips. 

Автор matt adler ( назад)
man thats bullshit the yamato had enough armor to take the firepower
against battleships and then sinks really totally bullshit, so what iowa
got a hit on turret no. 2 these two another turret could still fire and
skin the iowa. totally bullshit i say.

Автор Rob L ( назад)
Radar was not that accurate especially a long range, it might have been
able to get the guns within 5 degrees at best. And don't forget Yamato
also had radar, granted not radar controlled gun fire and not as good as
the Americans. Yamato's big advantage is armor, she had a lot of it, in a
gun duel she would have been very hard to sink even for the Iowa. Iowa's
armor on the other hand was not sufficient to match up against Yamato. 

Автор Ammo Alamo ( назад)
A lot of the Iowa/Yamato comparison depends on when it supposedly takes
place - when the Iowas are first at sea with inexperienced crew, facing
experienced Yamato crews, or during 1944 when things are going badly for
Japan and the Iowas have some experience, or near war's end when the Yamato
has to be sent out with a one-way load of fuel, partly because that is all
the available fuel and partly to make sure the Yamato captain did not turn
tail at the point of action.

There was never a point in WW II where the conditions were right: Yamato in
battle-ready condition, an Iowa battleship in equivalent battle-ready
condition, both ships within a few hundred miles of each other and equally
supported or not supported by land and carrier air. So never would there
have been any heroic Yamato/Iowa face-off to see who would win or lose .
Nor was there any chance of using the battleship power alone to decide the
ships' fates. At no time would a one-on-one confrontation have
been acceptable to either force, except perhaps as a face-saving attempt
late in the war by the Japanese.

So Yamato vs. Iowa would not have happened, except in the fervid
imaginations of armchair warriors with an axe to grind (a virtual axe) and
of course a favored ship.

I would say, if a virtual Yamato/Iowa battle were to occur, then Yamato
wins if:
A. she surprises Iowa at night and has her usual surround of cruisers and
destroyers firing the incredibly effective Long Lance torpedoes, and
B. the Iowa is encumbered by a support force comprised of the usual US Navy
early-war ignoramus captains and admirals with no sense of a battle plan,
no understanding of how to react to an attack, and no willingness to
quickly get into the Iowa's strength: battle joined from certain
advantageous distances, using spotting aircraft, and employing
the destroyer screen to best advantage instead of letting them foul the
radar and get in the way of the sight lines of the battle ships.

Iowa wins if:
A. Battle is joined near daylight and continues into daylight, reducing the
Japanese extensive training and experience in night fighting, and allowing
US radar to be employed to full advantage as a range finding and
director-control device, and
B. US forces maintain clear communication so that the US Navy battle ships
can get into fighting distance quickly, and get clear lines of fire, and
C. Destroyer and cruiser forces attack with guns and torpedoes but work
under the direction of the battle leader and stay clear of the battle ship
guns, and
D. US Navy spotter planes accurately report fall of shot, and
E. All other US aircraft keep radio traffic to a minimum and to a
professional standard, instead of their usual habit of spewing senseless
noise, so much so that airplane radio wavelengths all become clogged with
shouts and hollers and nearly become useless as a modern battle tool.

As for Japanese naval on-the-scene leadership, remember, at Leyte, the Japs
had the day won, but their commander feared more US ships would appear out
of nowhere. Those US Navy ships were still hours away, because the complex
jap attack plan had for once worked perfectly to draw Halsey's main forces
far away from the main thrust of the Japanese attack.


So for fear of potential defeat, the Japanese leader at Leyte Gulf did a
180 degree retreat, despite winning the fight on every level. The Jap
retreat was gratefully received by the captains and crew of several damaged
and sinking US Navy destroyers and escort carriers. The US Navy forces had
bravely and fiercely attacked against unwinnable odds, and won the day only
by throwing their ships onto the shells and torpedoes of the attacking Jap
forces until the Japanese retreated for no good reason at all, despite
having way more firepower and armor than the US navy force arrayed against
them.

There would never have been a 1:1 Iowa/Yamato face off, because that's not
the way the US Navy allowed its battleships to work; they were essentially
big shore bombardment platforms, equally useful for their twenty 5"/38
anti-aircraft cannon firing the top-secret proximity fused shells,
plus their too-many-too-count 40mm Bofors and 20mm Oerlikons, many of which
were director controlled.

The Jap Long Lance torpedoes were fearsome weapon systems, much more
effective than the US counterparts, so much more effective that for some
months the US Navy really did not have a torpedo worth the name. If the
Yamato battle group got within torpedo range of an Iowa battle group it
would be hard to see how the Iowa group could respond in kind at all, much
less stay afloat for long.

As for the alleged US Navy's radar advantage, it is just so much hot air.
When properly trained and fully equipped, the Japanese naval night fighting
equipment was fully the equal of US Navy radar at short and medium ranges
as shown by actual battle data during the fights around Guadalcanal (no
long range data is available for comparison). The Japanese officers and
sailors, at least the fully trained crews available near the beginning of
the war, were better than their US Navy counterparts in training and
in proper battle responses. Witness the November 14 night action near Savo
Island where a modern US Battleship was effectively taken out of the fight
by Jap cruisers and destroyers alone, with a lot of help from a lone
US ill-trained electrician officer who screwed up the battleship's breaker
system to the point he nearly got his own ship sunk.

Автор Matthew Day ( назад)
not realistic at all 

Автор Pradhitya Bayu ( назад)
yamato is better than iowa.. yamato is super-battleship class, 

Автор monday hello ( назад)
大和の射程の方が長いはずです。

Автор Dylan Weinstock ( назад)
Even though that is true the HMS Hood was doomed any way. She was no mach
for the Bismarck 

Автор Steve White ( назад)
Hint: men on deck while main battteries are firing is instant death and or
deafness.....everything thing above main deck is behind some sort of armor
for a reason....even life boats are under armor on the Yamato class......

Автор Niklas H. (499 лет назад)
Die jamato war zwar stärker gepanzert und hatte mehr geschütze aber hatte
eine sehr schlechte luftabwehr. So waren kamikaze flieger gegen die
missouri zwecklos den die flieger der jamato kamen nicht einmal bis zur
missouri durch befor sie von der luftabwehr getroffen worden sind. So wurde
die yamato am ende von der missouri versunken 

Автор UnknownPerson onGoogle ( назад)
To all the stupid and ignorant Americans mentioning HMS Hood, Hood was not
a battleship she was a BATTLECRUISER and the Germans only sunk her due to a
VERY lucky long range hit which happened as she was half way through a turn.
Even the Germans knew they scored a lucky hit.

Hopefully this will dispel some of the unneeded and unwanted arrogance from
Americans.

Автор stupidonduty ( назад)
I liked the commentator's extended explanations!

Автор 冯剑锋 ( назад)
wow

Автор 冯剑锋 ( назад)
lol its a tie

Автор 007NeverEnd ( назад)
me parece muy poco apegado a la realidad las armas del yamato eran muy
superiores a las de cualquier buque existente sobre la faz de la tierra en
ese momento ni 3 clase iowa juntos podrían haberlo hundido, claro sin apoyo
aéreo


Автор Ken Whitcomb ( назад)
Beware of "paper" ships. Yamato was big and impressive; an amazing piece
of construction. The Japanese are justly proud of the her. But both
Yamato and sister Musashi succumbed quickly to air attacks they were
designed to survive. They had the biggest anti-aircraft batteries of their
day including anti-aircraft shells for her main guns. The Japanese
themselves passed judgement on the class when the third ship was converted
to an aircraft carrier. Shinano was sunk on her maiden voyage by the
submarine Archerfish partially due to the belief of her captain that
American torpedoes were weak and could not possibly sink such a huge and
well-armored ship. It only took four of them to send her to the bottom.

Автор Ariff Danial Azizan (881 год назад)
Yamato is the best ship that japan ever build Yamato need to win uss lowa
is not the best ship ever build you suck you don't know about Yamato you
fuck turd


Автор AmericanThunder ( назад)
Why would Iowa get so close instead of staying at great range and using her
radar assisted fire control to score accurate hits while the yamato chases
colored shell splashes and prays for a lucky hit?

Автор smyers820gm ( назад)
You guys are all nuts. There is secret proof that Godzilla turned up and
ate that bitch before anyone could sink her!!!

Автор kristama kasso ( назад)
But yamato is more stronger than iowa

Автор konnar kober (114 года назад)
whats the game called

Автор yan cunha ( назад)
USS- iowa BB-61 the best

Автор Mansai Nomura ( назад)
masturbation movie

Автор SkaFredrick ( назад)
Yamato Class Battleship = 18 inch cannons very powerful but not more
powerful than iowa, and ca 5 inch cannons, speed = Very slow

Iowa Class Battleship = 16 inch cannons and 5 inch cannons, speed = faster
than yamato, Iowa has more destructive power in cannons than yamato.

This sums it up =
Yes the fight would be like yamato vs yamato.


Автор Luke Yama ( назад)
Yamato could out-range attack.
Nevetheless, why ????

Автор theodore459 ( назад)
STAND NEW USS WASHINGTON SINKS BATTLESHIP KONGO OFF GUADALCANAL , Historic
Fact

Автор theodore459 ( назад)
the battleship USS WASHINGTON SUNK THE JAPANESE BATTLESHIP KONGO OFF
GUADCANAL

Автор Oswald Cobblepot ( назад)
Lots of butthurt in here. Yamato was comprised of lousy armor and was
inferior to the Iowas in every single way, other than having "bigger main
guns." All 4 Iowas are still afloat today, and have a proud and lengthy
service history. Both Yamato Class ships have a short and not so proud
service history, and both are under water...

Автор Ian Schuelke ( назад)
Its simple its not the diameter of the barrels that matter its the
maneuverability. If the Iowa and Yamato had met Iowa would've out
maneuvered her all day and in a pure gun battle that's game over. Not to
mention most Battleships and battlecruisers were not armored well against
plunging fire and the Iowa had a much higher max elevation which would
enable a higher possibility of plunging fire. HMS Hood took 1 round of
15inch Plunging fire and sank....

Автор 上猶盛矢 ( назад)
yamato have46cm gun

Автор Mika Hakkif ( назад)
I Know That Germans And I.J.N Are Allies,

Anyone Thought Of
Bismark Vs Yamato? 

Автор Anthony Mollica ( назад)
great job, nicely done, thank you for posting :)

Автор Brian Tomlinson ( назад)


Автор themadhatter1234 ( назад)
So Yamato is good at combat but sucks at air cobat

Автор themadhatter1234 ( назад)
Yamato has advantage at guns but Iowa has better AA guns

Автор kornek21 ( назад)
the yamato was designed to deal with the Iowa class battleships, and at a
distance where the iowa classes wouldnt even be in distance to fire back.

Автор JoshQuade Gaming Animations And More ( назад)
1,200 planes attacked the yamato with bombs and torps

Автор JoshQuade Gaming Animations And More ( назад)
Question no. 1 it did!

Автор JoshQuade Gaming Animations And More ( назад)
and grant butler question no.1 did the yamato sink cause of torpedoes? A.
it did. B. it did not

Автор JoshQuade Gaming Animations And More ( назад)
thats what will happen to iowa
I sank yamato With the help of iowa in the cover of night!!!!!! (used
torpedo/dive bomber dosent really care)

Автор JoshQuade Gaming Animations And More ( назад)
and no ship can beat the Iowa at long range combat It even has a speed of
30 knots!!!

Автор JoshQuade Gaming Animations And More ( назад)
Grant butler The Yamato battleship loses if night or fog but wins if day
The Iowa/Montana whatsoever wins if night or fog but lose if day i tried
this with battlestations pacific it worked for yamato Even south dakota
wins!!

Автор carpenterbear ( назад)
18 inches guns, great armour, made to win... 300 hundred plus airplanes to
defeate it... I'm listening just people who refuses to accept the truth...

Автор George Gromovoy ( назад)


Автор dennis merrick ( назад)
mighty mouse is much more interesting

Автор the master ( назад)
YES USA WON! USA USA USA USA WOOOO!

Автор BestFavorite ( назад)
Sick video! What game is it? Plz anyone tell me :)

Автор Igor Faslyev ( назад)
The wet dream of American Iowa fan boys who are convinced beyond a shadow
of a doubt that the Iowas were the pinnacle of battleship design. They were
an adequate design for the purposes they were built for (fast carrier
escorts) but seriously the Yamatos were in a class of their own. Claiming
that an Iowa class ship could have sunk a Yamato in a one-on-one gun duel
is like saying that a German Koenig class dreadnaught could have sunk a QE
class super dreadnaught. The likelihood of that ever happening approaches
zero. Iowa could have conceivably disabled Yamato, it could have knocked
out the latter's steering, could have left it in a very bad shape but it
could never have sunk it. Plus, we're talking here a very unlikely scenario
in which the Japanese never score a single 18 inch hit on Iowa. If Iowa got
hit with an 18 inch shell, depending on where it lands, the consequences
would have ranged from very serious to catastrophic. Several such hits and
Iowa would have been in very dire straights as well, with her captain's
best advised to disengage and run for it while his ship still had the speed
advantage, which might not have been the case at that point. If an Iowa
ever ran into a Yamato in the Pacific her best option would have been to
keep the distance and call in air support, it would never have been able to
sink the Japanese super battleship on her own. 

Автор Tony Lupo ( назад)
The Yamato fans should just be happy that someone made a video of their
ship, The Yamato is on the bottom of the ocean along with lots of ships. I
hand it to the guy just putting together a neat video. The truth is the
Iowa's radar guided 16 inch guns would of probably scored more hits and the
Iowa's armor was superior to the Yamato's but I still would give the
Yamato a fighting chance against any ship..

Автор TOY5OLDI3R24 ( назад)
MY GOD the first thing i noticed before the battle even started is how
stupid the un-named "Iowa class" is in this video! THE TURRETS ARE
COMPLETELY WRONG!! THOSE LOOK LIKE TURRETS FROM THE NEW MEXICO CLASS

Автор Evangelinger ( назад)
Although this was the pre modified yamato, not the 1945 modification
variant with greatly upped anti air and the addition of 6 large caliber
howitzers and improved radar and fire control, i think iowa still might
have won, but both ships would have sunk in this videos engagement
guaranteed, they are so close to each other that missing is next to
impossible, and the Iowa's superior AP shells ultimately won the day(she
hit the Yamatos magazine at 8:46 which sunk her.), at longer distance
yamato would probably have won due to superior weapons range.

Автор Daniel Zoernig ( назад)
Iowa had radar directed guns. Yamato didn't. It would have lost.

Автор Charlie Tuong ( назад)
why didn't the Yamato use those seaplanes it carried on the stern? they
would have given the Yamato an advantage. 

Автор SvenTviking ( назад)
Something you guys ought to think about. No dreadnought or superdreadnought
battleship ever sank another dreadnought or superdreadnought solely with
it's guns. Never happened, not once. Battleships may have crippled or
stopped other battleships but all sinkings were either by torpedo, aircraft
bombs or scuttling. Please don't start listing off battlecruisers.

Вставка видео:

URL 
Ссылка 

Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>

Видео

Seo анализ сайта