Видео


USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE*



remade this, my other Iowa vs Yamato video kind of sucked, let me know what you think of this and and subscribe


Просмотров: 304689
Добавлено:
Длительность: 10:22
Комментарии: 3008

Тэги для этого Видео:



Найти больше видео в категории: "22"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Похожие видео:

The Battleship Bismarck. The Final Battle

Просмотров:
Yamato-Sinking the Supership-part01

Просмотров:
Super battleships Yamato / Musashi tribute.

Просмотров:
Top 10 WWII Battleships and Battlecruisers

Просмотров:
Yamato vs Nelson& Rodney

Просмотров:
Best Of The Best - USS Iowa (BB-61)

Просмотров:
Silent Hunter 4: Battleship Yamato sunk by US Navy Balao Class submarine

Просмотров:
USS Iowa - Welcome to Los Angeles

Просмотров:
Clash Montana vs Kongo&Nagato

Просмотров:
Death of Yamato

Просмотров:
WW2: Death of the Imperial Japanese Navy

Просмотров:
What happens when you mess with the US Navy - Battleship Hyuga

Просмотров:
Big Guns! Navy Training Film on Battleship Main Gun Operation and Firing

Просмотров:
Best Warship WWII [Iowa,Yamato,South Dakota,Bismarck,King George V,Richelieu,Vittorio Veneto]

Просмотров:
Battleship YAMATO 大和 -Last battle of world's biggest warship.

Просмотров:
Battleship USS IOWA - Armed with Nine 16 inch Guns

Просмотров:
Sinking The WW2 Greatest Supership Yamato | Greatest Naval Disaster | Military Documentary Channel

Просмотров:
World of Warships - Know Your Ship! - Iowa Class Battleship

Просмотров:
Battleship USS Iowa (BB-61) passing under Golden Gate bridge for her final voyage to LA. 05 26 2012

Просмотров:
Part 2: Battleship Yamato at The Battle of Leyte Gulf - 10/25/1944

Просмотров:

Комментарии:

Автор Bradly Sugar ( назад)
I got to visit the Iowa down in Long Beach, incredible ship it is.

Автор Uchiha Izami ( назад)
American Bias

Автор ロック・ショオテルブラック ( назад)
putos gringos ya qusieren el poderoso missuri le yegara los pies a yamato
el mstro de los oceanos ja puto missuri

Автор burntham113 ( назад)
Although the Iowa had superior targeting, at THAT range there's no doubt in
my mind that the Iowa would have lost.

I'm all pro America, I served, but the Iowa would have been shredded by the
Yamato's guns. Now at a realistic range, the Iowa could easily have out
gunned the Yamato, since it's targeting was heavily reliant on spotter
planes, while the Iowa's was radar based.

Автор Nathan Durrence ( назад)
Don't care what you think, this is a North Carolina class BB, Iowa has a
different turret type, more of a box type

Автор Yazi Australia ( назад)
People that say the Iowa is better are all Americans .... Ignore them
hahaha

Автор youzin 洋神 ( назад)
大和型とアイオワ級はどちらが強いか議論されることが多いですが、どちらも一長一短といったところでしょうか。実際のところ建造時期はアイオワのほうが新しいため強いと主張する方もいます。自分の意見としては、まず、造られる上での目的の違いが議論にて噛み合わないというのがあると思います。アイオワは当時最新のレーダーやその他のコンピュータを搭載していました。速度も33ノットと非常に速いということが挙げられます。このことからアイオワ級は空母を護衛する際に速度を空母と同じ位に出せて戦艦と近距離で戦闘になっても高い火力で空母を守ることを目的としている。ということがいえます。続いて大和はアイオワとは違い、空母の護衛にしては、27ノットとやや遅く、46cm砲やそれに耐えうる410mmの装甲を備えています。このことから、戦艦との戦闘を目的としているということがいえます。この二隻を現実に近い条件で戦わせるとまず、高性能のレーダーでアイオワが大和を捉えます。しかしまだ肉眼では見えませんし、射程外です。次に大和がレーダーにて発見します。そして大和のほうが艦橋が高いため肉眼でも捉えます。次に距離が40kmを切った辺りで大和が砲撃します。9発中一発が命中したとします。大和の砲撃に耐えれないアイオワは装甲を撃ち抜かれます。アイオワが大和にダメージを与えるには上部構造物やそのなかで装甲が薄いところを狙う他ありません。単純に考えても対艦においては大和が勝つのは物理的に考えて自然です。

Автор person kasai ( назад)
アイオワ級中心か、コラ!!!!!!なめてんじゃねぇゾ、このクソガキ!!!殺すぞ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Автор Fabian Sotelo ( назад)
que chistoso...

Автор Dan Burress ( назад)
In A contest between Iowa and the Yamato, the Yamato would win if she hit
first, and caused significant flooding on the Iowa, forfeiting her speed
advantage.A single hit on Iowa's fire control station and the two would be
equally matched

Автор Louis Francisco ( назад)
he wanted yamato to lose cuz he ain't Japanese

Автор jeff rice ( назад)
Denmark Strait. Thoughtless battle plan by british. Keep Hood out of
Bismarck's guns n Engage Eugen. That was what a battle cruiser was built 4.
Hey, n why should,t Eugen n Bismark get n Hood so quick. Gunnery plot was
steady n ready. British course highly predictable. Admirals who never
fought n a battleship, tsk, tsk, tsk.

Автор jeff rice ( назад)
Got a kick out of Roma sinking Iowa. Italians couldn't hit Manhattan n Iowa
had Radar directed fire control. Not realistic @ all.

Автор jeff rice ( назад)
Battleships were a useless fantasy built by dreamers fighting the last war.
Carriers n subs would have a crippling effect n Japanese.

Автор jeff rice ( назад)
I think most of these fantasy video's aren't well thought out. A fantasy
video where 4 intenstance where Bismarck knocked out Rodney, knocked out
KGV. Handled the cruisers, n waited 4 a sub screen 2 develop would b far
fetched but if Rodney hadn't've been lucky, that's what would've taken
place. People that laugh @ Bismarck's gunnery should take into account the
forward turrets were useless after hydraulics were knocked out.

Автор jeff rice ( назад)
Funny vid. Iowa listin heavily, guns @ awkward angle, finds target
suddenly. C'mon, a human would have a hard time Doin that.

Автор jeff rice ( назад)
Funny. Iowa was a flak ship. Never was a "Battleship" Yamato was built by
the Japanese who new they didn't have oil 2 feed it. What was it good for?
Japanese should have concentrated n proximity fuses, radar gun control n
case they wanted 2 get bombed while attempting 2 try 2 have another
Guadalcanal (1st). Ah, hindsight.

Автор Daring do Brown ( назад)
For fuck sake




America and Japan are the most stupidest countries I've seen with this by
seeing how large thos things are the 2 countries are just fucking around
with resources wasting them

Автор cmtmj2006 ( назад)
Iowa's radar fire control was unequal and would put shot after shot into
Yamato's vital areas. Also her 16in 50 cal. was no slouch. Her shells have
been less weight than Yamato's 18.1 but Iowa had higher velocity.

Автор Reymund Cariaga (592 года назад)
this game is not battlestation pacific its silent hunter 4

Автор Reymund Cariaga (776 лет назад)
in real the yamato and its ship was ambush by americans by planes that was
yamatos final campainge in 1945

Автор lingcod91 (80 лет назад)
I'll TRY to make the point so many of you can understand the realities of
combat, and naval combat specifically:
Shell Size, Mussel Velocity, Armor, Fire Control, Ship's Speed, and any and
all other aspects of a naval engagement is THE STARTING POINT for a
warship. IT IS NOT THE FINAL or ONLY aspect. Victory is determined by the
compliment aboard the ship. The people, training, experience, and will.
Example: What really caused HMS Hood's defeat?
Errors . . . by the British. A little too late. Prinz Eugen mistaken for
Bismarck, wrong position, etc. Human errors vs. human experience made the
difference.

Автор 13Enclave ( назад)
Murica fuck yeah.

Автор KIM ERIC ( назад)
I can somewhat agree to this due to te fact that the Iowa's immense speed
could easly catch up to the Yamato to get inside for the firing distance,
the reason why I think why the Yamato lost was because the gun accuracy
between Iowa and Yamato was outclassed, people seem to misunderstand the
bigger battleships always wins, that is false, even though Iowa is a longer
ship than Yamato lol, if this was an h44 battleship which was never made
and h44 lost to Iowa I completly disagree with that

Автор Gary Seymour ( назад)
Loved the video, however not very realistic. In reality one or both of
these battleships in a one on one battle would have been disabled or sunk
rather quickly after a slug fest at such close ranges like this one from a
few salvos of 16 and 18 inch shells.
Don't see much use of the main 16 inch and 18 inch guns on ether ship
throughout the battle. Both ships can fire 2 shells a minute from each main
gun, don't recall seeing even one full broadside from the main guns on
ether ship. The muzzle flash and smoke from the main guns is almost
non-existent. Saw what appear to be lots of fire from the secondary guns on
both ships which would almost useless against each other.
Noticed sailors on the main deck. When the main guns are being used on
battleships there never is any sailors on deck due to the overwhelming
concussions of the big guns that would knock them overboard or kill them.
The visible battle damage with fires and smoke as in so little of it on
both ships detracts from the overall quality of this video battle. The
paint on both ships looks totally intact throughout this entire battle
with one listing and the other sinking.
Hate to be critical as you put a lot of work into this video, however you
got to work on your realism. This video looks more like a video game. Note
there are some actual videos of battleships in action here on you tube. You
should watch them.

Автор MAJID ALASMARI ( назад)
in my opinion if Yamato battleship was used properly during the ww2 in the
battle of liety it wouldn't end up in a kamakazy mission
Yamato was a powerful battleship but the Japanese didn't use it Wisely.
18 inch caliber monsters I don't think Iowa at that time will stand a
chance.

Автор Edward Hale ( назад)
yes very unrealistic yes iowa would have won the battle but however due to
the listing in this video she wouldn't have been able to fire her guns and
she would have capsized both ships in this case would have sunk

Автор 987 Tails Productions ( назад)
Yamato would nail the Iowa by far, the ship has top acing crew and
captains. plus those 46's are heavy-carbo tipped going at a much faster
velocity than Iowa, the iowa would NOT stand a chance against the odds

Автор 田中正 ( назад)
うるさい

Автор _THE_BEAST_CREEPER XL ( назад)
that's the USS missour its an Iowa class

Автор lingcod91 ( назад)
And why all the secondary fire from both ships? Not clear what caused the
death blow to Yammy, certainly not 5'' shells. You had it sinking like
torpedos hit it. And does the game restrict you to only creating short
jerky images of the ships? Also, the salvos sound like space weapons. Nope,
not realistic or imaginative. Try again.

Автор 黒田官兵衛 ( назад)
This condition other and Iowa cannot win in Yamato

Автор lingcod91 (1153 года назад)
I don't think Iowa would have put, or got, herself in such a close
broadside slug exchange. Yammy had the greater range and would used it.
Whether she scored a hit on Iowa isn't the point, steaming into 18" shells
would be extremely dangerous. But to cross her T might have been Iowa's
best chance of success. The setup is indeed too unrealistic to judge,
except to say it would have been ugly.
BTW, saying the Bismarck got lucky is like saying Ali threw some lucky
punches. Hood made some fatal errors, and that's all it took. Ultimately,
judgement and skills outweight armor and shellfire. The fears about
Bismarck's firepower was fully justified by the British. The order was: No
single battleship was to engage Bismarck. Hood arrogently pushed that
order, mistook her target, and was a bit late getting into position to use
her full main guns. But England was disparate and had to prevent Bismarck
from reaching the Atlantic. Bismarck might have changed the course of
history. A very powerful ship.

Автор piergiorgio caroli ( назад)
Yamato's cannons could cut in half Iowa. Her armor wasn't that resistant.

Автор potato master 2000 ( назад)
really battle stations Pacific

Автор MrEjidorie ( назад)
Dear viewers, I found an interesting article about USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato .
Please open this site below and enjoy.

http://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-ultimate-battleship-battle-japans-yamato-vs-americas-13737


Автор Bluefin Tuna ( назад)
People ask how an Iowa Class could beat the Yamato. The Yamato struggled to
hit a US Aircraft Carrier at 20k yards with several Salvos. The USS Iowa
fired on an escaping IJN destroyer at 34k yards and straddled it with its
first salvo.Big guns are useless if you cannot hit anything with them.

Автор WILLIAM POTTS (1397 лет назад)
many people forget the the Japaneses steel was far inferior to american
steel.
japan didn't have the resources to produce higher quality steel which means
that despite having thicker armor the Yamato actually had similar if not
weaker armor than the Iowa's armor

Автор Needle Viper ( назад)
I think Yamato should of won not USS Iowa

Автор Kari Virtanen ( назад)
By arcraft! Dummies.

Автор peter menzel ( назад)
I'm sorry mate but that would never happen how can a Iowa class beet the
Yamato when it has less fire power and Less armour

Автор Otaku KazuyaKun ( назад)
on my opinion i still prefere yamato because of the ship design and
firepower... also... dat 18.1 inch guns bruh lol...

Автор 1974Teebone ( назад)
That same fatal flaw that sunk the real Yamato. Weakly protected magazine
under the #2 main cannon. As powerful as the IJN was it seems odd such a
massive flaw would make it to production. That and someone mentioned a real
Iwoa commander would never get that close: Yamato had 2 secondary guns. 2.
The Mighty Mo had 7 on each side. Getting that close was the only way she
could topple the Yamato had they ever faced 1v1. Fortunately the Mo had the
fastest engines of all ships in that class and could do just that.

Автор Al Morales ( назад)
Why iowa vs yamato
You should do montana vs yamato

Автор Giovanni Santoni ( назад)
The yomato should have won against the USS iowa, the yomato was better. The
iowa won cause of its american pride bullshit. such bullshit.

Автор Alejandro Sola Carrion ( назад)
siempre tienen k ganar los putos americanos, me cago en dios
el yamato era mucho mejor k el otro

Автор destroyer2 explosive ( назад)
that wa svery close the yamato almost destroyed them if the general
sneaked attacked it will be easier for ioiwa

Автор m aulia akbar ( назад)
It looks like iowa was yousing the colrodo guns not the 16 inc guns

Автор Jason C ( назад)
the Iowa could only fire starboard. In the video she's firing from her port
side.

Автор Härskiboy1803 ( назад)
Yamato's armor was designed to resist its own 46cm guns from
20 000 m away


Автор 小西健太 ( назад)
やはり、大和が負けたか。

Автор Wanda Bradley ( назад)
Witch is not very long range

Автор Wanda Bradley ( назад)
Well the uss iowa had a better secondary battery

Автор GSthen ( назад)
What a bunch of propaganda.

Автор Wong wan chung ( назад)
Todays' Iowa Class Battleships are Fitted with Deadlier Anti-ship Missiles
like Harpoons and the Tomahawk Cruise Missile and Fire 1 Harpoon Missile
and 1 Tomahawk Cruise Missile at Yamato at Ranges Far Beyond 80 Kilometers
Once locked-on by the Fire Control Radars onto Yamato as seen on this
Demonstration and the Missiles with Definitely Sink Yamato at her Weakest
Armor Plating above the Command Structure Funnel and the 3rd 18-Inch Turret
of Yamato and Capsized her.

Автор Maurice Johnson ( назад)
My name is maurice johnson retired ship building here in Baltimore but no
more I love the work as welder my father also was a welder 40 years working
in ship building I made up my mind at age 12 to work in in ship building it
was a good life

Автор kurakensama ( назад)
Well, Yamato and company had troubles sinking tin cans...

Автор onlythewise1 ( назад)
rememeber the battleships had to fit in the panama canal two feet was all
that was left on the Iowa bb61

Автор Wanda Bradley ( назад)
Idontudhfxj

Автор Flyz it Dies ( назад)
Ah Battleships... The Navy's punching bag 

Автор S Van Gaal ( назад)
What game is this?

Автор Rodrigo Gabriel Vargas ( назад)
Montana is stronger than yamato class


Автор Alexius Nemo ( назад)
If Admiral Halsey hadn't left the landing fleet uncovered to chase after
Japanese "bait" force there might have been a mano y mano Battleship fight
between the Yamato & Iowa class battleships

Автор Alexius Nemo ( назад)
Battleship were the centerpiece of tasks forces. No battleship would fight
alone. The US had much more "at sea time" which translates to a better
working crew. Consider how poorly the Yamato was handled during the Battle
of the San Bernardino Straight. (Battle of the Leyte Gulf) If the IJN task
force had been better handled/led it should have been a devastating US
defeat. Instead it ending up being a US victory.

Автор Gangsta Pikachu ( назад)
The Yamato had no radar so the Guns weren't accurate the Iowa had radar so
they could pin point accuracy and Iowa had speed.

Автор COCKROACH ( назад)
murica fuck yeah

Автор Exilninja ( назад)
Not sure how the Iowa would win here. Both ships are close enough that
their shells will smash through each others armour, but Yamato's shells are
larger and have superior penetration. The Iowa has speed and accuracy on
her side, but at this range I'd find it hard to believe that the Yamato's
gunners would miss when their target is in plain sight. Yamato fires a
heavier broadside too.

If the ships were engaging each other at range, it would be a different
story.

Автор judd49th ( назад)
ssmusic214: You may not know the man, but I might, so pipe down.

Автор Nicephore Phocas ( назад)
Fucking american Bullshit !!

The IJN Yamato & Mushashi were the strongest Battleship ever built at
that time , not even the Bismarck was a good Match against the YAMATO !!

All shows against any IJN battleships are a loser against any allies ship

De la pure crap.

Review your history book before making any reconstitution realistic ??!!

Автор surearrow ( назад)
>>-----------------> UnknownPerson onGoogle <---------------<< HEY
JERKO! Americans have reasons to call HMS hood a battleship! Hood was the
largest ship in the Royal Navy when completed; thanks to her great
displacement, in theory she combined the firepower and armour of a
battleship with the speed of a battlecruiser, causing some to refer to her
as a fast battleship. Wiki states, "Battlecruisers served in the navies of
Britain, Germany, the Ottoman Empire, Australia and Japan during World War
I. By the end of the war (WWI), capital ship design had developed with
battleships becoming faster and battlecruisers becoming more heavily
armoured, blurring the distinction between a battlecruiser and a fast
battleship. The Washington Naval Treaty, which limited capital ship
construction from 1922 onwards, treated battleships and battlecruisers
identically, and the new generation of battlecruisers planned was scrapped
under the terms of the treaty."

Автор surearrow (237 лет назад)
>>-------------------> The real U.S. Commander would never get so
close. Placing his vessle at a horrible disadvantage and not using the
Iowa's strengths. American fire control and radar on the BB Iowa was
light years beyond anything in the IJN, and we knew this at the time. The
Iowa could make multiple hits a on a dime, and give you nice cents change.

Автор Jade West ( назад)
It looks like a Montana ship because usually lowa class only carry
helicopters Montana carry plane

Автор jawedz ( назад)
greetings from japan. there is a discussion and some boasting bellow about
a radar system of iowa class. fyi, yamato class was fitted with a radar
system circa 1943. though it might be less reliable and capable than an
american radar, it was used in the battle of layte gulf when yamato's
46cm-18in gun hit an american light aircraft carrier.

Автор joekidd1992 ( назад)
America wins again!!!

Автор Isoruku Yamamoto ( назад)
How about IJN A-150(Super Yamato) vs Iowa >:3

Автор Kratons ( назад)
Ohhhhh that Shell-fly-by sound.........

Автор Ender bomb ( назад)
All hail the mighty Yamato. Like if you agree.


Автор 98755785a ( назад)
The bottom line is that, after 1943 or so, having the world's best optical
fire-control systems was largely irrelevant. The night battle between
Washington and Kirishima near Savo pretty much settled the point; good
radar usually beats good optics in a stand-up fight. And the radar used by
Washington off of Guadalcanal was not as good as the sets fitted aboard
Iowa.6
Then there's the fact that all radar fire-control is not created equal.
Radar operating at meter or decimeter wavelengths is useful for ranging,
but lacks the angular accuracy necessary for training. In practical terms,
this means that a decimetric set can develop a range solution via radar,
but must rely on an optical director to supply training information for the
battery. This hybrid fire-control solution is, of course, limited by the
quality of the optics available, and also by the visual horizon (which is
closer than the radar horizon), and weather conditions. Only with the
advent of 10cm and (later) 3cm wavelength sets was true 'blindfire' radar
fire-control achievable, wherein the firing ship need never come into
visual range of the opposing vessel. The Germans, Japanese, and Italians
never developed sets of this capability (both the Japanese (despite its
10cm wavelength) and German sets were usable for fire control against a
battleship-sized target only out to a range of about 27,000 yards.) The
bottom line is, then, that the Allied vessels, and particularly Iowa and
South Dakota, would enjoy an enormous advantage in gunfire control over
their adversaries. She would have the ability to lob shells over the visual
horizon, and would also perform better in complete darkness or adverse
weather conditions.

The final adjusted rating also reflects the fact that American FC systems
employed by far the most advanced stable vertical elements in the world. In
practical terms, this meant that American vessels could keep a solution on
a target even when performing radical maneuvers. In 1945 test, an American
battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant solution
even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by
back-to-back 100-degree turns.7 This was a much better performance than
other contemporary systems, and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical
advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their
opponents could only do one or the other.

Автор seimeisen mijikai ( назад)
YAMATO vs BISMARCK Please.

Автор ssmusic214 ( назад)
IJN Yamato 40 cm/45 Type 94 naval gun:

Effective firing range 25 km (16 mi)
Maximum firing range 42 km (26 mi) at 45° elevation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/40_cm/45_Type_94_naval_gun

USS Iowa 16"/50 caliber Mark 7 gun:

Maximum firing range 23.64 mi (38 km)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16%22/50_caliber_Mark_7_gun

Автор さんたか ( назад)
色々おかしい所が満載なので書かせてもらおう。

1)大和の火力、防御力及びアイオワの火力、防御力。
戦艦は自分の主砲火力に耐えれるように設計されている。(どの国でも基本的に同じ)つまり大和のバイタルパート(主砲塔、弾薬庫、缶室ect)は46cm砲の直撃に耐えられるようにできている。(数発同箇所に被弾すればその限りではない)
しかしアイオワの主砲は40.6cmにもかかわらず、大和主砲塔天蓋部分及び煙突部分に1発ずつ命中しただけで貫通している。しかも艦上部に被弾したはずが、なぜか艦首喫水線下(水面の下)から浸水しそのまま沈没。(キングストン弁でも開けたのかな?艦首にはないけど)
それに対しアイオワはおそらく右喫水線下に大和主砲が直撃し傾斜しているにも関わらず主砲を発射、命中させている。艦が傾斜した状態で撃っても基本的に命中しないし、むしろ傾斜が一定を超えると主砲を発射できない。(46cm砲弾が喫水線下に命中したときにアイオワの装甲であの程度の傾斜ですむのかも疑問だが)

2)交戦距離が近すぎること。
昼間の戦艦同士の砲戦でこれほど近距離での砲戦はまず発生しない。(しかもアイオワはレーダー管制射撃で視界外から撃てる。)
副砲や両用砲が届く距離は近すぎる。(見張りは寝てたのかな?)

以上のことからこの動画はただアイオワを格好よく勝たせたいが為の公平さも何もない動画だと思われる。(アイオワの利点すら帳消しにしている。)
もちろん公平に戦った場合もアイオワに全く勝目がないと言うことではないが(主砲の連射速度はアイオワの方が速い)、この動画の通りに大和が被弾した場合、主砲塔は一撃で破壊されることはないし、煙突根元は火災が発生するだけに留まる可能性が高い。(仮に動画の通りに破壊されても沈没はしないが。)

アイオワが大和に勝つ方法があるとすれば、レーダー管制射撃による遠距離射撃と大和よりも優れた発射間隔により、大和が射撃できる距離に入る前に畳み掛ける事ではないだろうか?
(大和はレーダー管制射撃ができないため、「敵の射程外から一方的に撃破する」と言う46cm砲の戦略は破綻している。)

Автор Shannon Mcvey ( назад)
John McGlan - The Iowas were NOT longer than the Yamatos. NOR were they
designed to destroy the Yamatos. The Iowas were well under construction
before ANYONE outside the japanese high command even knew that the Yamatos
had even been DESIGNED, let alone what they were capable of. You are
thinking of the MONTANA class ships which were still under construction
when the Yamato and Musashi were finally sunk by aircraft. The Yamato had
radar like the Iowa, and the Yamato's guns outranged the Iowas by almost 5
nautical miles. She also had nearly identical speed. If these two
behemoths had ever had the misfortune to meet on the high seas, in good
weather, the Iowa would have been on the bottom likely before she ever had
a chance to fire a shot.

Автор Gary Sellars ( назад)
Amerikkkan shit...

Автор John McGlannan - Realtor ( назад)
The USS Iowa was longer then the yamato also it depends about takitiks and
Iowa could use AP or HE rounds also Iowa could use speed and munufrubilty
to circle and Iowa was made to destroy the yamato.

Автор DoubleMrE ( назад)
Since larger guns have longer range, I think its only common sense that
Yamato could've beaten an Iowa class in a one-on-one fight if it could stay
beyond their range, and within their own. But that would be difficult,
given the Iowa's greater speed. The fact is that either ships guns were
powerful enough to sink the other regardless of both ships armor
protection. I think the most important factor would be the experience of
the officers and crews. Of course, a lucky hit on a magazine by either side
would be doom for the other.

The USN had plans in the works to build an even bigger class than the
Iowas. The 'Montana' class would've equaled the Yamato class in size,
though they would've still been armed with 16" guns (but would've had 12 in
four turrets as opposed to the Iowas with 9 guns in three turrets).

Автор 新井利昌 ( назад)
Both battle ships are so beautiful! And so are the flag of the rising sun
and the stars and strips. 

Автор matt adler ( назад)
man thats bullshit the yamato had enough armor to take the firepower
against battleships and then sinks really totally bullshit, so what iowa
got a hit on turret no. 2 these two another turret could still fire and
skin the iowa. totally bullshit i say.

Автор Rob L ( назад)
Radar was not that accurate especially a long range, it might have been
able to get the guns within 5 degrees at best. And don't forget Yamato
also had radar, granted not radar controlled gun fire and not as good as
the Americans. Yamato's big advantage is armor, she had a lot of it, in a
gun duel she would have been very hard to sink even for the Iowa. Iowa's
armor on the other hand was not sufficient to match up against Yamato. 

Автор Ammo Alamo ( назад)
A lot of the Iowa/Yamato comparison depends on when it supposedly takes
place - when the Iowas are first at sea with inexperienced crew, facing
experienced Yamato crews, or during 1944 when things are going badly for
Japan and the Iowas have some experience, or near war's end when the Yamato
has to be sent out with a one-way load of fuel, partly because that is all
the available fuel and partly to make sure the Yamato captain did not turn
tail at the point of action.

There was never a point in WW II where the conditions were right: Yamato in
battle-ready condition, an Iowa battleship in equivalent battle-ready
condition, both ships within a few hundred miles of each other and equally
supported or not supported by land and carrier air. So never would there
have been any heroic Yamato/Iowa face-off to see who would win or lose .
Nor was there any chance of using the battleship power alone to decide the
ships' fates. At no time would a one-on-one confrontation have
been acceptable to either force, except perhaps as a face-saving attempt
late in the war by the Japanese.

So Yamato vs. Iowa would not have happened, except in the fervid
imaginations of armchair warriors with an axe to grind (a virtual axe) and
of course a favored ship.

I would say, if a virtual Yamato/Iowa battle were to occur, then Yamato
wins if:
A. she surprises Iowa at night and has her usual surround of cruisers and
destroyers firing the incredibly effective Long Lance torpedoes, and
B. the Iowa is encumbered by a support force comprised of the usual US Navy
early-war ignoramus captains and admirals with no sense of a battle plan,
no understanding of how to react to an attack, and no willingness to
quickly get into the Iowa's strength: battle joined from certain
advantageous distances, using spotting aircraft, and employing
the destroyer screen to best advantage instead of letting them foul the
radar and get in the way of the sight lines of the battle ships.

Iowa wins if:
A. Battle is joined near daylight and continues into daylight, reducing the
Japanese extensive training and experience in night fighting, and allowing
US radar to be employed to full advantage as a range finding and
director-control device, and
B. US forces maintain clear communication so that the US Navy battle ships
can get into fighting distance quickly, and get clear lines of fire, and
C. Destroyer and cruiser forces attack with guns and torpedoes but work
under the direction of the battle leader and stay clear of the battle ship
guns, and
D. US Navy spotter planes accurately report fall of shot, and
E. All other US aircraft keep radio traffic to a minimum and to a
professional standard, instead of their usual habit of spewing senseless
noise, so much so that airplane radio wavelengths all become clogged with
shouts and hollers and nearly become useless as a modern battle tool.

As for Japanese naval on-the-scene leadership, remember, at Leyte, the Japs
had the day won, but their commander feared more US ships would appear out
of nowhere. Those US Navy ships were still hours away, because the complex
jap attack plan had for once worked perfectly to draw Halsey's main forces
far away from the main thrust of the Japanese attack.


So for fear of potential defeat, the Japanese leader at Leyte Gulf did a
180 degree retreat, despite winning the fight on every level. The Jap
retreat was gratefully received by the captains and crew of several damaged
and sinking US Navy destroyers and escort carriers. The US Navy forces had
bravely and fiercely attacked against unwinnable odds, and won the day only
by throwing their ships onto the shells and torpedoes of the attacking Jap
forces until the Japanese retreated for no good reason at all, despite
having way more firepower and armor than the US navy force arrayed against
them.

There would never have been a 1:1 Iowa/Yamato face off, because that's not
the way the US Navy allowed its battleships to work; they were essentially
big shore bombardment platforms, equally useful for their twenty 5"/38
anti-aircraft cannon firing the top-secret proximity fused shells,
plus their too-many-too-count 40mm Bofors and 20mm Oerlikons, many of which
were director controlled.

The Jap Long Lance torpedoes were fearsome weapon systems, much more
effective than the US counterparts, so much more effective that for some
months the US Navy really did not have a torpedo worth the name. If the
Yamato battle group got within torpedo range of an Iowa battle group it
would be hard to see how the Iowa group could respond in kind at all, much
less stay afloat for long.

As for the alleged US Navy's radar advantage, it is just so much hot air.
When properly trained and fully equipped, the Japanese naval night fighting
equipment was fully the equal of US Navy radar at short and medium ranges
as shown by actual battle data during the fights around Guadalcanal (no
long range data is available for comparison). The Japanese officers and
sailors, at least the fully trained crews available near the beginning of
the war, were better than their US Navy counterparts in training and
in proper battle responses. Witness the November 14 night action near Savo
Island where a modern US Battleship was effectively taken out of the fight
by Jap cruisers and destroyers alone, with a lot of help from a lone
US ill-trained electrician officer who screwed up the battleship's breaker
system to the point he nearly got his own ship sunk.

Автор Matthew Day ( назад)
not realistic at all 

Автор Pradhitya Bayu ( назад)
yamato is better than iowa.. yamato is super-battleship class, 

Автор monday hello ( назад)
大和の射程の方が長いはずです。

Автор Dylan Weinstock ( назад)
Even though that is true the HMS Hood was doomed any way. She was no mach
for the Bismarck 

Автор Steve White ( назад)
Hint: men on deck while main battteries are firing is instant death and or
deafness.....everything thing above main deck is behind some sort of armor
for a reason....even life boats are under armor on the Yamato class......

Автор Niklas H. (500 лет назад)
Die jamato war zwar stärker gepanzert und hatte mehr geschütze aber hatte
eine sehr schlechte luftabwehr. So waren kamikaze flieger gegen die
missouri zwecklos den die flieger der jamato kamen nicht einmal bis zur
missouri durch befor sie von der luftabwehr getroffen worden sind. So wurde
die yamato am ende von der missouri versunken 

Автор UnknownPerson onGoogle ( назад)
To all the stupid and ignorant Americans mentioning HMS Hood, Hood was not
a battleship she was a BATTLECRUISER and the Germans only sunk her due to a
VERY lucky long range hit which happened as she was half way through a turn.
Even the Germans knew they scored a lucky hit.

Hopefully this will dispel some of the unneeded and unwanted arrogance from
Americans.

Автор stupidonduty ( назад)
I liked the commentator's extended explanations!

Автор 冯剑锋 ( назад)
wow

Автор 冯剑锋 ( назад)
lol its a tie

Вставка видео:

URL 
Ссылка 

Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>

Видео

Seo анализ сайта