Видео


Whats the Big Deal about the KJV? - Sam Gipp



This isn't my production, but is splendiferous nevertheless. Sam Gipp delivers the truth cleverly and effectively in this short docu-drama.

http://www.samgipp.com


Просмотров: 53182
Добавлено:
Длительность: 8:14
Комментарии: 9570

Тэги для этого Видео:



Найти больше видео в категории: "27"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Комментарии:

Автор Charlyn Palomares ( назад)
I was once a modern version fan, I read three different modern bible
versions every night and the result is just more confusion. I noticed some
verses are missing from a certain version while present to the other one
and God is not the author of confusion so I took a research on why this
things be, then I found out (well, God showed to me) that its because of
the Bible manuscripts. When I read the King James Bible everything runs
smoothly,clear and specific. Also, I don't think the Bible was written in a
novel way so based on my experienced and fervent prayer the KJV is the
final authority in english language. I'm not a KJVist, I'm loyal to the
infallible Word of God that just happens to be King James Bible.

Автор Nick Giorgione ( назад)
This is a laughable video done in total ignorance..............pretty sad
!! Any Christian involved in this KJV only-ism should be ashamed.

Автор Truth Seeker ( назад)
So very odd that the bible itself says NOTHING about "final authority."

Автор Glory2TheKing7 ( назад)
GOD can use a corrupt perversion to break someones heart and show them
their need for the Saviour Jesus Christ just as He used someone of
convicted murder to lead me to Him... that's because He is GOD and with GOD
nothing is impossible. A person however cannot truly know GOD when they are
reading from a satanic book GOD is not thee author of confusion
1Corinthians 14:33 He did not give us hundreds of bibles all contradicting
one another in one way or another... In fact He promised to preserve His
word psalm 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from
this generation for ever.12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as
silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. The King James
Bible is the 7th English translation of the bible ..GODS perfect number of
completion. Look at this verse do we read our bibles do we seek GOD as
Jeremiah 33:33 says .... Ecclesiastes 8:4 Where the word of a king is,
there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou?
I don't need a man to show me the TRUTH GOD does that wonderfully by faith
I believe that GODS words are TRUTH He says so I believe so by Faith I
believe the Authorized Version is the inerant inspired infallible word of
GOD.
Hebrews11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that
cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them
that diligently seek him.
And if we are really talking about history here look at the decline of our
once great nation look at what was disregarded THE KING JAMES BIBLE this
cannot be denied.


Автор Glory2TheKing7 ( назад)
Dear Dana .W
Praise the LORD! Thank you for speaking TRUTH! It is so wonderful to read
your comment I pray you have trusted in Jesus for eternal salvation. GOD
bless you Sir..GOD bless you.
Amen and Amen!


Автор Edward Aguilar ( назад)
Thier is only one Absolute Truth,this guy needs to debate someone like
Pastor Anderson,not over a cup of coffee ,but about 3 , 4 hours most people
won't ,thier Bibles are gay friendly ,and many other mistakes,thier is only
1 Absolute Truth,
The Word of God is the devils worst enemy
Therefore he must corrupt it

Автор Annu Philip ( назад)
Somebody please speak to this brother and make him see sense!
Such people alienate people from Christianity

Автор Annu Philip ( назад)
Serious misconception!

Автор ὁ κατέχων ( назад)
This guy barley knows the history of the compiling of the Alexandrian
manuscripts and the Textus Receptus manuscripts. The verses which many who
are caught up in the KJV onlyist movement which they claim to have been
"taken" out of the Bible have actually been shown to be added by later
translators in, you've guessed it, the Textus Receptus! Much of the
Alexandrian manuscripts are proven to be older than the Textus Receptus
manuscripts which have shown to add verses. The Alexandrian manuscripts are
much more accurate than the Textus Receptus. But even if the Textus
Receptus were more accurate, the KJV still makes it's many errors in the
translation of the Greek. This has been shown throughout much of the KJV.
The English translation of the KJV is not perfect. He also seems to assign
Antioch a type of "primacy" over Alexandria, just based on Egypt's past
history of violence. Yet there were Christians now in Egypt spreading the
gospel! These Christians certainly were not violent, they had a true love
for Christ, and a true love for the gospel! Alexandria as a early Church
see had more primacy over Antioch anyhow. He really needs to learn his
history instead of using vague and manipulative arguments for his belief.


Автор InspiringPhilosophy ( назад)
LOL! Sam Gipp might as well tell us Jesus rode a unicorn into Jerusalem. I
mean if you are going to make up nonsense and call it history why not go
all out. I don't think Sam has ever studied anything about the history of
the New Testament or textural criticism. This is sad and an embarrassment
to Christianity. Seriously, Sam should be utterly ashamed for the nonsense
he is spewing out! He is a liar, there is no other word for it. What he is
saying is fiction and made up. The Textus Receptus is not the Majority
text. There are over 1800 difference between the TR and the MT. Also please
show me one Greek manuscript with the KJV reading of 1 John 5:7. There is
none. It is not in the majority text or any manuscript from Antioch. That
is just the tip of the iceberg of the filth and utter nonsense in this
video.

Автор Mario world N.Y ( назад)
I'm impressed with Gipp, he isn't a bad actor.

Автор Brad McFadden ( назад)
Check out this video on YouTube:

Автор Mr. Moore ( назад)
It makes you wonder why someone who professes faith in Jesus Christ (a
Christian), would want change or correct the Bible in the first place. That
is not characteristics of a Bible believer, nor is that the work of the
Holy Spirit!

Long Live the A.V.!

Автор Tim Lewis ( назад)
I think the NIV is good but not perfect, and the KJV clears up some verses,
but translating two or more different words as hell is confusing, e.g. the
grave and gehenna

Автор Makaveli Knight ( назад)
King James ONLY! Don't be fooled by that Vatican devil James White, who
promotes the modern Alexandrian Vatican bibles!

Автор TheBluegoatman ( назад)
The King James Institute states "how dare they teach the Bible without
education or authority." I would like to see all the proof they have about
the men that wrote the four gospels. Surely if we have to be educated to
teach the Bible those that wrote it must have been educated to write it?
Where did their authority come from? Did they just write it like Luke did
for history? And other men give it authority? Should we compare what we
read to the original manuscripts or should we just accept the kjv blindly?
From this I take it gipp is like the early catholic church. Just trust him
to know the truth and that should be good enough. Might as well have the
robes and alter boys too!

Автор Ivan Lee ( назад)


Автор La F ( назад)
Why is Sam Gipp such an awful man? He didn't have to ruin his coffee! Poor
guy...

Автор Dana W ( назад)
I'm as narrow-minded as the Bible. Everything I believe is based upon the
TRUTH that the Bible is God's inspired Words. The Bible can be summed up in
one word—TRUTH (John 17:17).

I believe in the infallible, inspired Word of God. When I use the term
“Word of God,” I believe it refers to the King James Bible as being the
infallible, preserved, inerrant, inspired Word of God. I believe in the
verbal, plenary inspiration of the Bible. The Old and New Testament are
definitely inspired word-for-word. I accept the Textus Receptus manuscripts
from which came the King James Bible.

The Scripture is the Final Authority in all matters of faith, morals, and
practice. I recognize the 1611 King James Bible as the fulfillment of God's
promise to preserve His Word in Psalm 12:6-8. I believe that ALL modern
translations are corrupt, which are based upon the heretical work of
Westcott and Hort. I believe that the “original” autographs of the Word of
God are in Heaven (Psalm 119:89). The King James Bible is definitely
INSPIRED by God.

Before God ever spoke the universe into existence, the last Word of
Revelation was already recorded in Heaven. God promised to preserve His
“Words,” not a language. God's Words are inspired, regardless of the
language into which they are translated. God's Word will always be inspired
and preserved.

God speaks to us today through His Son (Hebrews 1:1,2), i.e., through the
Word of God. Jesus is the Living Word (John 1:1-3,14; Revelation 19:13).
Jesus commanded us... SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES! (John 5:39).

Whether you like it or not, it's God's way or the highway. Literally, the
Bible teaches that most people are traveling on a highway to Hell and
destruction (Matthew 7:13-14). God doesn't play games. You go through Jesus
to Heaven or you burn in the Lake of Fire. It's that simple. A poll
revealed that only 7% of Americans believe the Bible. It is any wonder why
America has gone to Hell in a wheelbarrow?

A genuine man of God preaches with authority, because the Bible is an
authoritative Book, authored by an authoritative God. God is the divine
Lawgiver. God is the Final Authority and His Word, Sola Scriptura, stands
as the Final Word.

This is why so many people hate the precious King James Bible—It is
Authoritative. Feminists hate an authoritative husband, and an
authoritative pastor and an authoritative God.

Автор Streicher Liker ( назад)
This is a BS story. How about being honest about the original language.
Jews are the antichrist and these pastors know it. White people are Israel.
Jew is a word that should never appear in the Bible. Greek Bibles are hated
by the lying jews did not write their corrupt version until after the both
testaments were written and they fed it to St.Jerome. There were no Jews
before Judaism even though they existed as the children of Satan and known
by different names. Biblical hebrew looks Phoenician

Автор Chaplain Bob Walker B. Th. ( назад)
King James was not a sodomite. the strongest language AGAINST SODOMY is in
the King James Bible. No "gay friendly" church uses the KJV Bible for a
good reason. Sodomy is called an abomination. No queer king would allow
that in their Bible. The KJ Bible says sodomites are to be put to death.

Lev 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both
of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them. (Would a sodomite allow that in HIS
bible?) NO

Автор twfourofsix ( назад)
Bibliolatry! Jesus was not born in 1611.

Автор TheBranden86 ( назад)
im not saying the kjv is wrong im saying the history this guy is pushing
has to be

Автор TheBranden86 ( назад)
there is one problem here with me and that is that he says the transcripts
from Alexandria was incorrect but my history tells me that the library of
Alexandria was destroyed by the romans which is now I see y they destroyed
it, y do you destroy a library that has all the information gathered to one
place there is only one reason and that is to destroy the true history

Автор Bobby G Berney ( назад)
I have offered to debate publicly and video the debate to all anti-King
James people. I have offered to pay round trip air fare, hotel, and meals,
AND pay for time as well. I have also offered to pay for each and every
error that anyone can PROVE in a King James Bible. NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON
HAS TAKEN THE CHALLENGE. A couple did at first but backed out later and
never contacted me again.
Face the Devil and he will flee from you.

Автор Bobby G Berney ( назад)
The King James Bible is THE Word of God PRESERVED in English without error.
It is the Inspired Word of God.

Автор Kris B ( назад)
Wow. I want to believe this man is a Christian. He seems so sincere. But
he is blatantly lying about all of the evidence. He is saying that the
modern translations "take out" 1 John 5:7 because the Alexandrian's didn't
believe in the Trinity??? We know that is NOT TRUE. This man has to know
that. He's not stupid. We know 1 John 5:7 is NOT in the ancient
manuscripts, and it was added in later. This is a fact, and this man has
to know this. This means he must be lying about it. I see no other
option. The same is true when he says other verses have been taken out.
We aren't comparing the NIV to the KJV. We are comparing both to the
best, most plentiful, oldest, and most reliable manuscripts we have. We
can't take out what wasn't there.

Автор Robert Bowrosen ( назад)
This is a great series!!!!!!

Автор Rex Wee ( назад)
I'm Chinese. I don't think there is a bible version like the King James in
Chinese for us that we could get our hands on. Does that mean God didn't
preserve His perfect Word for the Chinese? KJV is just for English speaking
people, what about other languages?

Автор Diamond Dog ( назад)
Amen! Awesome video

Автор Child Of The Most High ( назад)
Whats the Big Deal about the KJV? - Sam Gipp

Автор Dustin King (1231 год назад)
The KJVists who still adamantly ignore all of the translation problems,
manuscript problems, outdated English expressions and many more problems in
the KJV are incredible. Or perhaps an example of human stubbornness. 

Автор Truth Seeker ( назад)
King James Institute - So I suppose you greatly "admire" the "woman drunken
with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus"
Rev 17:6

You KJV worshippers are to be pitied!

Автор pastormarkm ( назад)
I challenge all you KJV only proponents to put your faith in the KJV to the
test. Mark 16:18 says you will pick up poisonous snakes and drinking
poison will not kill you. This is noted in NASB and ESV as not being in
the earliest manuscripts, but you have faith that it is from God, so you
best start living it out...

Автор King James Institute ( назад)
People that watch this video and others in this series and still choose the
corrupted and perverted Bibles likely are bound mentally. They can see but
can not perceive. They hear but can not understand. Many of them are
teaching the Bible here and in other places without authority, education,
order, or decency. How dare they preach and teach the Bible without
education or authority! They are arm chair scholars full of rebellious
pride. These apostates are as filthy as any creature that crawls the earth.
Don't engage them dear friends. If this video can't help them then they are
not going to be reached by any man. Only God can help them. Many of them
Nash their teeth in the face of God and that's why they are bound in
darkness. They choose their Bibles because it's what "They Like." They
don't care about what God likes. Separate yourselves from the apostate. You
will know them by the filth that comes out of their mouth. They are filthy
dreamers and like to talk about sexual abomination. They love to talk about
themselves. They cling to filthy teaching that comes from their
understanding or science and or apostate publications. They are proud and
boastful. They typically will try to change the topic in order to distract
the faithful. They will nearly always try and discredit a source without
even considering the content. Their claim is typically that the source is
bias. They are completely unaware of the procedures for investigatory
research yet believe themselves to be experts on the subject. There tactics
seldom change. If what you hear doesn't line up with the truth or there is
some confusion it is usually because there is deception involved. The fact
is that the organizations which publish both of the texts which underline
the new Bibles (UBS/NA) have an agreement in writing with the Vatican which
requires them to meet the standards of the Catholic Church. I expose this
truth in my videos on the KJV. The manuscripts they use as a foundation for
those texts come from Egypt and are not complete and contain corrections,
strikethroughs, blank spaces where missing text should be located, and
conflicting information, and data that is not clear or verifiable (2
somewhat complete and 15 bits and pieces). There is a reason we believe
that the KJV is the pure and preserved word. It comes from manuscripts from
Antioch which have been preserved to the Jot and Tittle. The easy reader
has has a great deal of money pushed in behind it. The corporations are
making big money selling that copyrighted material which must contain 10%
change every time a new copyright is issued. The most wealthy organization
in the world (The Catholic Church) is behind them. Have you studied some of
the owners and corporations that publish those new Bibles? They are as
wicked as anything that crawls the face of the earth. Te greatest Bible
preachers and scholars the world has ever known have and or still preach
and teach from the KJV which comes from the most complete and reliable
(5000+) Manuscripts which are from Antioch.

It's hard work to try and undo the damage that the filthy apostate does so
I am constantly working as a true gospel preacher should. Doctrines that
have been abolished in the new Bibles such as the NIV and the NASB-->

1. The believer's baptism - Acts 8.37
2. The deity of Christ - 1 Tim 3.16; Luk 2.33; Act 4.27;
3. The Trinity - 1 Jn 5.7
4. Doctrine of poverty - 1 Tim 6.5
5. The Blood redemption - Col 1.14

The truth about new Bible versions-->

1) the manuscripts which are the foundation for your new Bible and every
other new Bible in mass publication today are incomplete there isn't a
single one of them that exists that is complete. They have errors, blank
spaces, corrections and read like a much corrected rough draft. The fact
that they are incomplete is proof positive that they are not the perfect
and preserved word of God.

2) Of the incomplete Alaxandrain or Egyptian Texts there are only 2
somewhat complete and 17 all total mostly bits and pieces.

3) They come from Egypt a place of known corruption whereas mine come from
Antioch a place where the first Christian Church was established. It was
evangelized by people such as the apostle Peter. It is the place where
Christians were first called Christians.

4) The organizations which translate texts which are formed from the
corrupted Egyptian manuscripts (UBS/NA) both have an agreement in writing
with the Vatican which insures that the texts must meet the requirements of
the Catholic Church.

5) There are 5000+ manuscripts from the area in and around Antioch and many
of them have been preserved and are complete and perfect to the Jot and
Tittle. Therefore, the Bible that is translated from these manuscripts can
truly be called the pure and preserved word God and are in alignment with
the promise and power of God to preserve His word perfectly. This is the
line of manuscripts which is the foundation for the KJV.

6)The word, deity of Christ, and Bible doctrine is changed and or
diminished in the New Bibles with an obvious slant toward the Catholic
faith.

7) There were more people in Biblical times corrupting the word of God and
likewise today Bible prophesy tells us that in the end times men will not
endure sound doctrine. That time is now.

-->The apostate is unable to disprove even a single point. I have
researched them all and can back up my data. The filthy false teacher
prefers to change the subject and avoid the facts. Misdirection, lies, and
wicked unfounded accusations are their only option. Their mind is bound and
their heart is hardened so they can't understand or perceive the truth. I
can't reach them. Only God is going to be able to help the filthy apostate.
They are perverts or filthy dreamers and they love the world so much that
they cling to it and gnash their teeth in the face of God.

Автор Melsina Iglesias ( назад)
Excellent demonstration ! Halleluyah

Автор itsyoureternalsoul ( назад)
This is really good if you want to continue worshipping the KJV. Can the
Bible version be an idol? What theological doctrines are different based
on other versions? Oh Yeah, The King James Only "Doctrine"

Автор LaDonna Woodley ( назад)
what a great explanation. thank you for the clear and concise reason why
the King James is the "big deal"

Автор King James Institute ( назад)
KJV Rules. It is superior to any other versions in every way. People honor
themselves. They don't care about what God wants. They have the nerve to
pick up an easy reader based on manuscripts out of Egypt that is based on
17 partial manuscripts that do not agree with each other or any other
manuscript in existence and compare it to a Bible authorized by God's
anointed the King of the English speaking world, put together by the fines
group of scholars ever assembled, based on 5000+ manuscripts out of Antioch
a place evangelized by such people as The Apostle Peter, The place of the
first Christian Church and the Place where followers of Christ were first
called Christians. Many of the Manuscripts from this are agree with each
other to the jot and tittle. There is not even a "i" missing a dot or a "t"
not crossed. Quit embarrassing yourself and quit dishonoring God. Get
yourself a good KJV Bible and study. Your best doesn't cut it if you aren't
going to study. Which KJV you might ask? There is only one 1611. There are
editions that are published to correct the numerous spelling and printing
errors. There was not standardized spelling in 1611 and so spelling varies
in the different printings. There were in fact 2 editions of The Holy Bible
(KJV) printed in 1611. Get with the program and stop trying to discredit a
source and not consider the content. It's not about what you like or what
version you prefer it's about what God likes. Abandon your ego and let go
of your pride and consider the facts or the truth. Most scholars prefer the
Cambridge and it's what I recommend. If I need to be more specific give me
a shout back. I can clean and insert your Binky and powder and pamper your
bum too. No really I don't mind helping but I am not interested in a
debate. It's like defending a lion. God's word doesn't need defending. If
you want to reject the truth then that might just be God's will. After all
there are many pretenders in the church. They have to change their
language, music, attitude, etc on Sunday morning. They are as fake as the
Bibles that tote. I Believe a man can be saved from a new Bible but I also
believe they are perverted and corrupted. They have just enough gospel in
them the fool most people. But that works for the believer because they
have enough truth in them to save. Jesus is a friend to sinners. I love you
enough to tell you the truth. Don't hate me for it. 

Автор Epoch Of Yore ( назад)
EPIC TRASH!!! So sick of the KJV defenders!!! We now have the dead sea
scrolls etc and so on. The KJV was AUTHORIZED by MAN not GOD! Sorry I would
rather use my HCSB that uses transcripts not even know in 1611.......
Before you KJV defenders jump in I would like to you remind you that people
in Russia and China going threw a HUGE revival do not have the KJV and I
assure you they will be saved. His argument on Antioch is such CRAP!!!! If
this is the case we should all be speaking Greek/Hebrew/Aramaic and your
video alone invalidates your original argument. 

Автор Craig Luchin ( назад)
One thing about being saved out of a MV, this doesn't happen. Why? Well,
MV's are from the KJB or the texts that gave it. So MV's take "the truth"
from the KJB into their own versions, and then the person is saved by "the
truth" rewritten from the KJB. But the real problem is, is that if a person
gets "saved" in a MV, he or she may think that they are "being" saved, not
"are saved", because the MV's teach salvation plus works. On top of this,
with a MV, you can prove that you must earn your salvation, with the KJB
you can not. Salvation in the KJB is always "by the blood" for salvation.
In MV's it's sometimes 'by blood' plus works. Confusing, for sure. Also,
the MV's remove around 5 to 25 times the words "by the blood" in reference
to salvation "by the blood" of Christ. But the worse thing about MV's is
that they discredit Jesus Christ as God. This is the key point I always use
when confronting other whom confess Christ, but are in MV's. Satan hates
Jesus. The MV's confirm this fact. 

Автор Jamesfatman ( назад)


Автор MrSaMuRaNGx ( назад)
Excellent presentation.

Автор Joachim Moeller ( назад)
This is something every christian should know!!

Автор thelastroadrunner ( назад)
*Myths About the King James Bible.*
MYTH 4- “King James Bible readers are dividing the Church of Jesus Christ
because they refuse to accept the modern English Bibles.”

The King James Bible is the culmination of Reformation Bibles published in
AD1611. Since that time no scholar has ever found an error in it (except
for spelling and punctuation which did not affect doctrine). Some 270
years later a few Anglo-Catholics (Counter-Reformers) conspired to “revise”
the King James Version to update the language and correct any errors. This
following passage is from Dr Frank Logsdon who was a cofounder of the NASB
who was later led by the Lord to repent of his apostasy-

“But nevertheless, they [the Revisers who produced the Revised Version of
1881/3] didn't have enough to revise. So what are they going to do? Well,
two brilliant Cambridge scholars by the name of Dr. Hort and Dr. Westcott
had been collaborating on a new Greek text built on the Codex Sinaiticus
and the Codex Vaticanus [Roman texts known and rejected by the Church]
which they believed were the very best manuscripts, held by Rome. So they
said to the committee when they saw there wasn't enough to revise-I don't
know if they said these exact words, but they said, "We would suggest that
we bring about a new version." And they had those men pledge themselves to
secrecy that they wouldn't tell anybody about the text they were using
until after the book was out. Afraid, I guess that they would be curbed,
that the King of England or somebody would prevent them.

Twice British royalty refused to have anything to do with the 1881
revision. But at any rate it was deception to begin with. Their own text
hadn't even been published yet, hadn't stood the scrutiny of the public. So
the 1881 was built upon that. And the only fundamentalist who stayed on the
board was Dr. F.H.A. Scrivener, and before he died he felt he had to break
his promise to this group of men, and he let the world know that they took
advantage after advantage in the text. That's where we've gotten the number
of something like 5,337 deletions. [That was his count.] And he said,
"Every time I raised an objection I was voted down, and they took liberties
with God's Word." He was right there at almost every meeting, and he
revealed that to the world before he died.”

The Revisers produced their unauthorized version which was filled with
doctrinal errors and departed from the Traditional Text in thousands of
places. They used the apostate texts of Tischendorf and Westcott & Hort
instead of the thousands of manuscripts which had been researched and
accepted by the Church of Christ. According to the monumental work of Dean
Burgon, The Revision Revised, which has never been answered, Westcott &
Hort’s basis for following just two rejected manuscripts was proven to be a
lie. It was Tischendorf, Westcott & Hort who “divided the Church” by
departing from the Words of God which were clearly and irrefutably
established in the English language 270 years previous.

Anyone who follows the lead of Westcott & Hort and the other “Revisors” by
reading apostate pseudo-bibles like the NIV, NASB, ESV, RSV, WEB, NEB,
NKJV, NLT etc. Is working divisively against the Word of God because they
are departing from the KJV without cause.

Автор thelastroadrunner ( назад)
*Myths About the King James Bible.*
MYTH 3- “Modern bible translations don’t have Matthew 17.21 because there
is no early evidence supporting it’s inclusion in the New Testament canon.”

Nothing could be further from the Truth. This from Dr Peter Ruckman in his
book The Christians Handbook of Biblical Scholarship-

“...every known cursive but ONE had the King James reading. The reading is
found in the Old Latin and the Vulgate it is found in the Coptic versions,
the Slavonic versions, the Syriac versions, the Armenian versions, and the
Georgian versions; it is also cited 120 years before the Trash Can Version
(Sinaiticus) or the wine VAT beer CAN with US (“B”) was written; and it is
found in eleven Church Fathers before A.D. 550.”

The false manuscripts Aleph and B (upon which the lie of the modern
versions is based) which omit this passage are so completely devoid of
reliability that they even disagree with each other over 3000 times in the
gospels alone!

Автор thelastroadrunner ( назад)
*Myths About the King James Bible.*
MYTH 2- “The Textus Receptus is a critical text combining only 7 Greek
manuscripts”

The Textus Receptus represents the scholarly refinement of Greek
manuscripts from all over the world. Erasmus was a world renowned scholar
of his time and one of the most prolific writers of all time. This from
Edward Hills-

"When Erasmus came to Basel in July 1515, to begin his work, he found five
Greek New Testament manuscripts ready for his use. ... Did Erasmus use
other manuscripts beside these five in preparing his Textus Receptus? The
indications are that he did. According to W. Schwarz (1955), Erasmus made
his own Latin translation of the New Testament at Oxford during the years
1505-6. His friend John Colet who had become Dean of St. Paul's, lent him
two Latin manuscripts for this undertaking, but nothing is known about the
Greek manuscripts which he used. He must have used some Greek manuscripts
or other, however, and taken notes on them. Presumably therefore he brought
these notes with him to Basel along with his translation and his comments
on the New Testament text. It is well known also that Erasmus looked for
manuscripts everywhere during his travels and that he borrowed them from
everyone he could. Hence although the Textus Receptus was based mainly on
the manuscripts which Erasmus found at Basel, it also included readings
taken from others to which he had access. It agreed with the common faith
because it was founded on manuscripts which in the providence of God were
readily available."

The following quotation from D'Aubigne's diligent historical research also
indicates that Erasmus had access to more textual evidence than his modern
detractors admit:

"Nothing was more important at the dawn of the Reformation than the
publication of the Testament of Jesus Christ in the original language.
Never had Erasmus worked so carefully. `If I told what sweat it cost me, no
one would believe me.' He had collated many Greek MSS. of the New
Testament, and was surrounded by all the commentaries and translations, by
the writings of Origen, Cyprian, Ambrose, Basil, Chrysostom, Cyril, Jerome,
and Augustine. ... He had investigated the texts according to the
principles of sacred criticism. When a knowledge of Hebrew was necessary,
he had consulted Capito, and more particularly Cecolampadius. Nothing
without Theseus, said he of the latter, making use of a Greek proverb."

Автор thelastroadrunner ( назад)
*Myths about the King James Bible.*
MYTH 1- “No Greek manuscript matches the King James Bible”
The King James Bible matches perfectly the Traditional Text most accurately
represented by Beza’s Greek NT and the Masoretic Tanakh. There is one
group of apostates that do not know this and that is those who oppose God’s
eternal Words – “Heaven and Earth shall pass away, but my Words shall not
pass away.” (Matt 24.35)

Автор Mark Rupert ( назад)
Bull

Автор hect190-909 ( назад)
It is sad to see a Christian resorting to misinformation and dumbing-down
centuries of biblical scholarship to promote his Johnny-come-lately
KJV-only talk. All I hear is pride, text-worship, anti-intellectualism and
a hateful motivation. He's no different than conspiracy nuts who hold on to
something they think they know and denounce others for not being the same.
In this case he thinks he knows biblical texts. He doesn't.

Автор boggymark1 ( назад)
Pontius Pilate, who wrote the death warrant of the Jesus of Nazareth, said
that he found "no fault" in the only-begotten Son of God according to the
infallible Holy Scriptures in any language as the inerrant King James Bible
bears record in fully legible English, but illiterate cyber frauds,
neo-Nazi plagiarists and atheist liars still slander Him as a "criminal"
today. The Lord Jesus Christ is the author and finisher of my faith. εν ω
εχομεν την απολυτρωσιν δια του αιματος αυτου την αφεσιν των αμαρτιων In
the infallible King James Bible, that Koine Greek text reads, "In whom we
have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins" (Col. 1:14
).

Автор TheLegacyHero ( назад)
This was a very good description by Sam Gipp of the King James only
debate. Indeed, I concur, we can not accept a text written by heretics as
authoritative and condemn a text preserved by bible-believing Christians
who were martyred for their loyalty.

Автор Corey Richard ( назад)
I like to read the KJV because it's what I feel God always leads me to
read. If I don't understand something, I will go to another version, or
commentary, until I get something cleared up, or have a different view
point, and then use that to allow God to lead me to the Truth of the
scripture. I use to read NIV, but since coming back to the faith, and
totally turning my life over to God, I just can't read anything else. I
don't hold anything against anyone for reading other versions (unless it's
that Message poem stuff, please get away from that) I just really feel God
move alot more in the scriptures, reading the KJV. I would recommend anyone
doing an in depth Bible study to atleast read the KJV as they go along. The
whole tone shifts, and the way things are reworded, the meaning falls flat
in some areas of the new versions. Also, all these new versions are VERY
new, whereas the KJV has been around for centuries. Wonder why? It's like
all these new vehicles. Breaking down all the time, wish I had my old
faithful back.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
Roadrunner I wouldn't bring up baptism if I were you. The KJV translators
REFUSED to translate the Greek word for Baptism, instead choosing to
"transliterate" it! Meaning they just spelled it out in English. If they
had translated it, it would have conflicted with their Catholic/Anglican
practice of sprinkling instead of baptism. They did the same thing with
"Deacon" which should have been translated "servant" instead of the high
office as the Catholics & Anglicans practice it! The FACT that the Roman
Catholic Apocrypha was contained in the AV1611 is undeniable proof of
Catholic influence. But I know you don't care about facts, because you have
been "bewitched" by uneducated KJVonly's!

Автор EtScripturaeSanctae ( назад)
Although Darwinism blossomed into the Third Reich, the Nazi regime
collapsed in 1945, but the contemporary tragedy on a global scale is that
the neo-Darwinists want to peddle their corrupt revisionism and empty
neo-Nazi rhetoric around the world more than ever.
Despite polluted torrents of convoluted Darwinian propaganda here and
abroad, both the accuracy and clarity of the inerrant King James Bible are
unrivalled in any modern language today--just as they have been since 1611.
Conversely, the corrupt revisionism of Darwinist and occultist apostates
like Wescott and Hort was the epitome of heresy and blasphemy.

Автор Tim Ford ( назад)


Автор EtScripturaeSanctae ( назад)
ιησους χριστος χθες και σημερον ο αυτος και εις τους αιωνας διδαχαις
ποικιλαις και ξεναις μη περιφερεσθε καλον γαρ χαριτι βεβαιουσθαι την
καρδιαν ου βρωμασιν εν οις ουκ ωφεληθησαν οι περιπατησαντες
Translated flawlessly into the perfect English of the inerrant King James
Bible, that ancient Koine Greek text reads: "Jesus Christ the same
yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Be not carried about with divers and
strange doctrines. For it is a good thing that the heart be established
with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been
occupied therein" (Hebrews 13:8,9).

Автор boggymark1 ( назад)
Acute paranoia and compulsive plagiarism are the chief reasons that
Counter-Reformation propagandists lie about the inerrant King James Bible
in Modern English, and there is no scientific basis for the failed theories
of Darwinists like Westcott and Hort. Charles Darwin was a laughingstock
across the British Empire and the United States during his own lifetime
because his silly hypotheses contradicted the integrity of the species,
none of which has ever evolved into another genus, as the inerrant King
James Bible bears record today.

Автор sportsloverism ( назад)
if you want to grow vastly as a christian or be a real bible student you
use the king
James version

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
Maybe Chaplain (so-called) Bob Walker would be so kind as to show us in the
KJV where it says ANYTHING about the wicked King James.

King Jimmy HATED Baptists, and said he "wanted to harrow out of England ALL
Baptists" that information didn't come from the KJV either Bobby!

Автор Sir Wolfgaar ( назад)
My understanding is that King James himself had nothing to do with the
scholarship of the KJV, he merely put his own mark on it when the men were
done with their work -- primarily to vaunt himself. I've heard a lot of
bad stuff about King Jim historically, but none of it reflects upon the
Authorized Version of the Bible that bears his insignia.

Автор Andy Osborne ( назад)
I'm ESV only ;-)
Try to find an ancient greek manuscript that is exactly like the textus
receptus; it doesn't exist.

Автор curiousonlooker042 ( назад)
Does anyone know what college they are at?

Автор alexmcginness ( назад)
Ruckman in all his prolific writings has not told us specifically where the
“final, absolute, written authority of God” was between the time the
original manuscripts passed off the scene and 1611. To believe in the KJV
as the final authority would actually mean that the original manuscripts
were not the final authority, because a true final authority can never be
replaced. to designate the KJV as the final absolute authority is to demean
the original manuscripts and the sources the KJV translators used in their
translation.Ruckman invented the "Alexandrian Cult" fantasy.


Ruckman demands a final authority that “anyone can read, teach, preach, or
handle.” Therefore, by default everyone since the era in which the
originals passed off the scene until people began to believe the KJV was
the absolute authority would also have to be members of the Alexandrian
Cult to remain consistent. Ruckman is clearly uncomfortable with the
question of final authority for other languages before 1611

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
ο ουρανος και η γη παρελευσονται οι δε λογοι μου ου μη παρελθωσιν
Translated perfectly into the exemplary English of the inerrant King James
Bible, those ancient and Greek words of the Lord Jesus Christ read: "Heaven
and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away" (Mark 13:31).
"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of
earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt
preserve them from this generation for ever" (Psalms 12:6,7).

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
Chaplain (so-called) Bob Walker is much like an ostrich, as he sticks his
head in the sand when confronted with facts that don't fit his
agenda. Like King James bi-sexuality. It is an hisorical FACT! I've got
news for ALL KJVonly's God doesn't use perfect people to translate His
word.........Why? Because there are none. I can provide dozens
of historical sources that verify James sexual proclivities. The
Encyclopedia Americana described King James thusly "He disdained women and
fawned unconcionably on his favorite men" So were they in on the conspiracy
too? I'll bet the good chaplain has black helicopters circling his house
as well. 

Автор Chaplain Bob Walker B. Th. ( назад)
Greg settle is lying again. King James was not a sodomite. the strongest
language AGAINST SODOMY is in the King James Bible. No "gay friendly"
church uses the KJV Bible for a good reason. Sodomy is called an
abomination. No queer king would allow that in their Bible.

Автор Earnest Stewart ( назад)
Great example and teaching 

Автор thelastroadrunner ( назад)
Greg Settle, an enemy of the Words of God, would have you believe that the
KJV translators considered it "bondage" (see the KJV preface) to recognise
that the KJV is the Words of God.

This is a blatant misrepresentation of what the translators were expressing
to the readers of their translation. In the Preface subsection entitled –
“Reasons inducing us not to stand curiously upon an identity of phrasing”
the KJV translators explain that they did not see the need to stand on
exact phrasing and precise wording. They said:

“...we have not tied ourselves to an uniformity of phrasing, or to an
identity of words, as some peradventure would wish that we had done,
because they observe that some learned men somewhere have been as exact as
they could that way.”

Whilst they deemed it necessary to accurately give the sense of the
original language they did not restrict themselves to the fastidious method
of translating the same original word with the same English word in every
place. They believed that such a method of translation would not be
practical and could actually have a detrimental end result:

“But that we should express the same notion in the same particular word...
that rather it would breed scorn in the atheist than bring profit to the
godly reader.”

They argued that there was no good reason to be bound to such a method of
translation:

“For is the kingdom of God become words or syllables? Why should we be in
bondage to them, if we may be free? use one precisely when we may use
another no less fit as commodiously?”

And if it was good for God to use such diversity of words in this way (in
the Hebrew and Greek) then, they argued, it was good for them too:

“... we cannot follow a better pattern for elocution than God himself;
therefore He using divers words in His holy writ, and indifferently for one
thing in nature...”

Those who hate the Word of God would have you believe that the KJV
translators didn’t think you, the readers, should be “in bondage” to their
translation, but it is clear from the context that they were discussing
their own translation method and NOT which Bible you should read.

The King James Bible IS the Words of God in the English language, complete
without error!

Автор boggymark1 ( назад)
Just as Bloody Mary was a fanatical popish Romanist idolater, so many of
the Byzantine emperors were also ungodly tyrants. After the fall of
Constantinople, Ivan the Terrible followed their example.
For the English-speaking peoples today on the other hand, the inerrant King
James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in the lingua
franca of our contemporary world exactly as Koine Greek was in the days of
the Apostles.

Автор arnel espena ( назад)
It is safe to say that if a person wanted to own a good English
translation, make sure that its translation should be done by a committee
of scholars more especially evangelical scholars and not done by single
individual only. Therefore, whatever translations a person has is good and
useful for edification. Whether KJV, NASB, ESV, NKJV, RSV, NRSV, or NIV
they are good and okay. 

Автор arnel espena ( назад)
Language translation like KJV or whatever cannot make a Bible perfect. It
is the essence and the pure message of the Bible that is perfect. If
someone really wanted to learn a lot from the Bible, He or she should
consult the original language, that is study the Bible from the Greek,
Aramaic and Hebrew language. Nevertheless, Many linguistic scholars are
trying their best to produce a translation that is beyond error or
impeccable though somewhat fall short because of the dynamic of English
language as a form of communication.

Автор Dana W ( назад)
Greg Settle is a LIAR and a false teacher. Period.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
The KJV translators thought nothing like the foolish & uneducated KJVonly's
of today. They said in "The Translator's to the Readers"

"For is the kingdom of God to become wods of syllables? Why shoudl we be in
BONDAGE to them if we may be free, use one precisely when we may use
another no less fit, as commodiously"

Are you in bondage to words and syllables jjpetkusiii....certainly the KJV
translators warned about this very thing.....won't you reconsider your
foolish attitude twds this wonderful, venerable translation!

Автор boggymark1 ( назад)
The LORD preserves the Holy Scriptures, not "the original autographs" or
the "oldest manuscripts." A dollar bill that was printed yesterday is worth
more than counterfeit ten-pound notes from a century ago, and the "critical
text" is based on Alexandrian corruptions that were rejected by the
majority of Christians who had not fallen into apostasy over the centuries.
Like jesuitical frauds, Westcott, Hort, Aland and White have all pushed
phony "bibles" unlike the inerrant King James Bible today.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
ουτως γαρ ηγαπησεν ο θεος τον κοσμον ωστε τον υιον αυτου τον μονογενη
εδωκεν ινα πας ο πιστευων εις αυτον μη αποληται αλλ εχη ζωην αιωνιον
Translated perfectly into the exemplary English of the inerrant King James
Bible, those ancient and Koine Greek words of the Lord Jesus Christ read:
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that
whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life"
(John 3:16).
Darwinism is a hoax, devoid of empirical proof.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
The corrupt revisionism of Darwinists like Wescott and Hort was the epitome
of heresy and blasphemy.
Manuscript evidence already demonstrated the integrity of the infallible
King James Bible in Modern English, and the fact that no one in four
centuries has managed to verify a linguistic or historical error anywhere
in its Old or New Testament texts constitutes empirical proof of its verbal
inerrancy in the lingua franca of our world--just as Koine Greek was during
the Apostolic Era.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
και εχομεν βεβαιοτερον τον προφητικον λογον ω καλως ποιειτε προσεχοντες ως
λυχνω φαινοντι εν αυχμηρω τοπω εως ου ημερα διαυγαση και φωσφορος ανατειλη
εν ταις καρδιαις υμων Translated perfectly into the exemplary English of
the inerrant King James Bible, that ancient Koine Greek text reads: "We
have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take
heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and
the day star arise in your hearts" (2Peter 1:19).

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
"For is the kingdom of God to become words or syllables? why should we be
in bondage to them if we may be free, use one precisely when we may use
another no less fit, as commodiously/" the KJV translators in "The
Translators to the Readers"

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
In all candor, Greg, I would hope the same thing for her sake in any case
because the AV1611 translators wrote that they fully intended to present
the "principal" translation of the infallible Holy Scriptures..."not to be
excepted against." Well, you may suppose that Ms Ivy realized that her
students would make some silly mistakes, but none of them including you has
ever proven any linguistic or historical fact that refutes the plenary
verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in Modern English.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
"it hath pleased God in his divine providence, here and there to scatter
words and sentecnes of that difficulty and doubtfulness, not in doctrinal
points that concern salvation, (for in such it hath been vouched that the
Scriptures are plain) but in matters of less moment," Wow, such a
difference in the way the KJV translators looked at their translation and
the way you and other uneducated KJVonlies look at it! I certainly hope Ms
Ivy isn't ashamed of me!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
Of course, they were Anglicans unlike you and me, but they translated the
infallible Holy Scriptures into Modern English perfectly, Greg. ο ουρανος
και η γη παρελευσονται οι δε λογοι μου ου μη παρελθωσιν Translated into the
exemplary English of the inerrant King James Bible, those ancient and Greek
words of the Lord Jesus Christ read: "Heaven and earth shall pass away: but
my words shall not pass away" (Mark 13:31). Your elementary-school English
teachers might be ashamed of you, however.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
You don't seem to find it odd that the KJV translators believed nothing at
all like you regarding bible translations. They said "That a variety of
translations is profitable for the finding out of the sense of the
Scriptures" The KJV translators would be ashamed of you jjpetkusiii!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
No, Greg, the AV1611 translators in heaven with their Saviour would not be
"shocked" that millions of regenerated believers in the Lord Jesus Christ
already know that the inerrant King James Bible is the perfect translation
of the infallible Holy Scriptures into Modern English, the lingua franca of
the world today. αρα η πιστις εξ ακοης η δε ακοη δια ρηματος θεου In
flawless English, that Koine Greek text reads: "So then faith cometh by
hearing, and hearing by the word of God" (Romans 10:17).

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
I'm sure the KJV translators would be shocked at such a statement. Here's
what they had to say about their hundreds of margin notes when they weren't
sure about a phrase or word: "Some peradventure would have no variety of
senses to be set in the margin, lest the authority of the Scriptures for
deciding of controversies by that show of uncertainity, should somewhat be
shaken. But we hold their judgment not to be sounnd in this point." You
KJVonlies go far beyond the KJV translators!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
@Greg Settle Did you try asking a native Greek about what the word for
"Easter" is in his original language? It is a perfect match for what Luke
penned at Acts 12:4. There are no errors anywhere in the in the infallible
King James Bible as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
λεγω δε υμιν οτι παν ρημα αργον ο εαν λαλησωσιν οι ανθρωποι αποδωσουσιν
περι αυτου λογον εν ημερα κρισεως Translated flawlessly into the perfect
English of the inerrant King James Bible, those ancient and Greek words of
the Lord Jesus Christ read: "But I say unto you, That every idle word that
men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment"
(Matthew 12:36). No Darwinist in history has ever presented verifiable
empirical proof that any species came from another genus.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. τη επαυριον βλεπει ο ιωαννης τον
ιησουν ερχομενον προς αυτον και λεγει ιδε ο αμνος του θεου ο αιρων την
αμαρτιαν του κοσμου Translated perfectly into the exemplary English of the
inerrant King James Bible, that Koine Greek text reads: "The next day John
seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which
taketh away the sin of the world." (John 1:29).

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
@Blood What? Just to let you know: there are no errors in the infallible
King James Bible as an irrefutable matter of historical fact because it is
the Holy Scriptures, given by inspiration of God and preserved by the LORD
in their entirety. During the Apostolic Era, the city of Antioch was a
rather cosmopolitan center of commerce in Syria, which was not under
Arabian control. Koine Greek was the common language there at that time,
and the very name "Antioch" is Hellenistic--not Arabic.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
No you are wrong, completely wrong! Indeed heathens DID celebrate
something, but it wasn't Easter. Because Easter was not in existence on
this planet! Please discontinue confusing folks and actual lying on this
issue. Luke cannot say something was being obsd when that something was NOT
in existence!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
Please reconsider your reply, Greg. It appears as though you are
unwittingly rejecting the Holy Scriptures in Modern English. I can assure
you that πάσχα means Easter, but if you doubt that, just ask any native
Athenian who is also fluent in the lingua franca of our contemporary world
because he will agree with me. The ancient pagan holiday that we call
"Easter" today had been celebrated long before St. Luke the Evangelist
penned Acts 12:4--just as the inerrant King James Bible records today.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
"evidence that a heathen spring holiday corresponding to Easter" I'm not at
all concerned about! The KJV translation say "Herod, intending after
Easter" There was no such thing! Because some heathens may have celebrated
SOMETHING around that time MEANS NOTHING! There was no EASTER observed on
Planet Earth in AD65!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
The corrupt revisionism of Darwinists like Wescott and Hort was the epitome
of heresy and blasphemy. Manuscript evidence already demonstrated the
integrity of the infallible King James Bible in Modern English, and the
fact that no one in four centuries has managed to verify a linguistic or
historical error anywhere in its Old or New Testament texts constitutes
empirical proof of its verbal inerrancy in the lingua franca of our
world--just as Koine Greek was during the Apostolic Era.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
βλεπετε αδελφοι μηποτε εσται εν τινι υμων καρδια πονηρα απιστιας εν τω
αποστηναι απο θεου ζωντος Translated perfectly into the exemplary English
of the inerrant King James Bible, that Koine Greek text reads: "Take heed,
brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in
departing from the living God" (Heb.3:12). Darwinism is an academic flop,
but that is just the tip of the iceberg. Darwinists like Wescott and Hort
corrupted the text of the inerrant Holy Scriptures in English.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
και ην ιωσηφ και η μητηρ αυτου θαυμαζοντες επι τοις λαλουμενοις περι αυτου
Translated perfectly into the inerrant King James Bible, that Koine Greek
text reads, "And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were
spoken of him." (Luke 2:33). Favored by Gnostics, occultists, illiterate
liars, Roman Catholic apologists, and lost and blind professors of false
religion, the wretched "modern versions" in English since 1881 are all
based on the great whore's corrupt Codex Vaticanus.

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
@Greg The word Easter is Germanic--not of Greek nor Latin derivation, but
there is plenty of historical evidence that a heathen spring holiday
corresponding to such an Easter was celebrated during the Apostolic Era,
and Lucifer did enter the English language from a Latin root as did
liberty, salvation, grace, charity, and many other Biblical terms found in
the inerrant King James Bible. The AV1611 translators gave England the
authoritative text of the infallible Holy Scriptures legible today.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
There was no such thing as Easter in AD 65 when Luke wrote Acts! Lucifer is
LATIN. The KJV translators were working with a Hebrew text and were
supposed to be translating that text into English! God the Holy Spirit
inspired the Hebrew word "heylel" which does NOT mean "Lucifer" it
literally means "daystar" The KJV translators said so in their margin note
"or O day Starre" I have the AV1611 right here at my desk! HEYLEL will
NEVER mean Lucifer. Lucifer was taken from St Jerome's Latin Vulgate!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
@Greg Settle The translators of the inerrant King James Bible were not
Counter-Reformation perverters of the Holy Scriptures like Westcott and
Hort who engaged in witchcraft and denied the complete atonement by the
shed blood of the Lord Jesus Christ, but because you have free will, you
can believe the modernist liars who follow such ungodly revisionists. I can
explain to you why Isaiah 14:12 and Acts 12 are correct in their context as
the inerrant King James Bible says, but you already erred.

Автор Greg Settle ( назад)
No Easter and Lucifer are clear mistakes. There was nothing in the entire
known world in 65 AD when Luke penned the book of Acts known as Easter. God
inspired the Hebrew word "heylel" at Isaiah 14:12 which literally means
"daystar" the KJV translators said as much in their margin note in the
AV1611, but they caved to political and social pressure and put in Lucifer,
which came straight out of St Jerome's Latin Vulgate! Pls be honest, we are
supposed to be Christians!

Автор jjpetkusiii ( назад)
@Greg Settle No. Lying was a Lebensart for the Darwinist and occultist
apostates and heretics, Wescott and Hort, who didn't know hermenetics from
a hole in the ground. Of course, they falsely claimed that "Easter and
Lucifer are clear mistakes," but no factual error in the infallible King
James Bible has ever been proven. The documentation for pure manuscripts
used during the Protestant Reformation was available during the Victorian
Era, widely known, and simply ignored by the revisionists.

Вставка видео:

URL 
Ссылка 

Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>

Видео

Seo анализ сайта