Видео


Whats the Big Deal about the KJV? - Sam Gipp



This isn't my production, but is splendiferous nevertheless. Sam Gipp delivers the truth cleverly and effectively in this short docu-drama.

http://www.samgipp.com

Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг
Просмотров: 42,867
Добавлено: 2 года
Длительность: 8:14
Комментарии: 10532

Тэги для этого Видео:  



Найти больше видео в категории: "Education"
Видео загрузил: UCAGIB
Показать больше видео, загруженных UCAGIB


Похожие видео:

Whats the Big Deal about the KJV? Episode 2 - Sam Gipp
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 8180
This isn't my production, but is splendiferous nevertheless. Sam Gipp delivers the truth cleverly and effectively in this short docu-drama....
King James Only Debate (This actually changed my mind on this subject)
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 82299
James White debates Jack Moorman on whether the KJV is superior to modern translations due to the manuscripts used. As I said in the title, this...
What's the Big Deal About the KJV? Episode 5
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 1952
http://bigdealkjv.com/
Should We Exclusively Use The King James Bible?
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 24613
Doug Harris is hosts a debate between Jack Moorman and Dr James White on the subject should we exclusively use the King James Bible. This program...
What's the Big Deal About the KJV: Episode 4
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 5043
http://bigdealkjv.com/ Sam gipp asked me to put this on my YouTube channel
Dr. Sam Gipp Sends Me a Gift
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 15740
Dr. Gipp was so kind to send me a gift recently. I thought you all would enjoy seeing his gift and hearing what he wrote to me. An interesting...
1611 or 1769?
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 22305
In this video I look at the changes to the Bible that occurred between 1611 and 1769. I will show that these changes are based on font, spelling,...
The NKJV vs. The KJV1611 by Dr. Sam Gipp
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг
Просмотров: 10707
22 omissions of "hell", 23 omissions of "blood", 44 omissions of "repent", 50 omissions of "heaven", 51 omissions of "God", 66 omissions of...
"New Age Bible Versions" & the "King James Only" Controversy - A Refutation

Просмотров: 16956
Larry Wessels, director of Christian Answers of Austin, Texas/ Christian Debater (YouTube channel CANSWERSTV...
What's the Big Deal About the KJV: Episode 3
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 4991
http://bigdealkjv.com/ Sam gipp asked me to put this on my YouTube channel.
Antioch vs. Alexandria by Dr. Sam Gipp
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 18983
Westcott and Hort chose to use texts from Alexandria Egypt (Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus which disagree with each other in 17,000 places)...
Whats the BIG DEAL about the KJV of the Bible plus Kent Hovind-Why KJV ONLY Why not other versions
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 2201
Whats the BIG DEAL about the KJV of the Bible plus Kent Hovind-Why KJV ONLY Why not other versions HERE IS THE LINK TO BRYAN DENLINGER HERE IN...
New World Order Bible Versions (Full Movie)
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 423269
SUPPORT THE FILMMAKERS! ORDER NEW DVD TODAY http://framingtheworld.bigcartel.com/product/new-world-order-bible-versions-dvd PAUL WITTENBERGER...
KJV vs NIV
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 22176
Many of you may not be familiar with the modern day deception of the so-called Christian Churches. Pastor Dowell educates us once again as to why...
A Brief History of the King James Bible
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 90415
Did Jesus Claim Deity? Shabir Ally & James White (Part 1/3)
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 31900
Thursday, March 22, 2012 at the North American Muslim Foundation in Toronto.
'501c3' Teaser (Official)
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 1766
My new up and coming documentary entitled 501c3, investigates into the origins of the incorporated status of the modern church... Journey to Rome...
Is the King James Version of the Bible the only perfect translation today?
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 18259
This clip is from our series entitled, "Which English Translation of The Bible is best for Christians to Use Today? Is the King James Version of...
Rick Flanders: Why We Use the King James Version of the Bible (Lancaster Baptist Church)
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 8689
Rick Flanders gives some simple Bible reasons we should believe God has preserved his word for us today.
The King James Bible Documentary (Interesting)
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 25706
The Story of The King James Bible
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 59272
http://scourby.com Story how we got our first English Bible, the King James Bible. Did you know that thousands of people were killed in England...
King James VS Other Bible Versions- Dr. Kent Hovind
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 49040
http://www.creationtoday.org/ Dr. Kent Hovind compares the King James Version Bible to the modern versions. Find out what really happened to Dr....
Kent Hovind on Bible Versions Part 1
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 14546
Kent Hovind explains why the King James version, unlike the other Bible versions, does not contain flaws. This video follows his explanation of...
The King James Bible BBC Documentary
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 31987
An interesting look at the history of the KJV Bible by the BBC. Enjoy!
The Best KJV Bibles
Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг Рейтинг 
Просмотров: 64670
Which King James Bible publishers do I recommend? The best I have found are from "Local Church Bible Publishers." Here is a link to their website:...

Комментарии:

Автор Rex Wee (1 месяц)
I'm Chinese. I don't think there is a bible version like the King James in
Chinese for us that we could get our hands on. Does that mean God didn't
preserve His perfect Word for the Chinese? KJV is just for English speaking
people, what about other languages?

Автор Dana W (28 дней)
I'm as narrow-minded as the Bible. Everything I believe is based upon the
TRUTH that the Bible is God's inspired Words. The Bible can be summed up in
one word—TRUTH (John 17:17).

I believe in the infallible, inspired Word of God. When I use the term
“Word of God,” I believe it refers to the King James Bible as being the
infallible, preserved, inerrant, inspired Word of God. I believe in the
verbal, plenary inspiration of the Bible. The Old and New Testament are
definitely inspired word-for-word. I accept the Textus Receptus manuscripts
from which came the King James Bible.

The Scripture is the Final Authority in all matters of faith, morals, and
practice. I recognize the 1611 King James Bible as the fulfillment of God's
promise to preserve His Word in Psalm 12:6-8. I believe that ALL modern
translations are corrupt, which are based upon the heretical work of
Westcott and Hort. I believe that the “original” autographs of the Word of
God are in Heaven (Psalm 119:89). The King James Bible is definitely
INSPIRED by God.

Before God ever spoke the universe into existence, the last Word of
Revelation was already recorded in Heaven. God promised to preserve His
“Words,” not a language. God's Words are inspired, regardless of the
language into which they are translated. God's Word will always be inspired
and preserved.

God speaks to us today through His Son (Hebrews 1:1,2), i.e., through the
Word of God. Jesus is the Living Word (John 1:1-3,14; Revelation 19:13).
Jesus commanded us... SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES! (John 5:39).

Whether you like it or not, it's God's way or the highway. Literally, the
Bible teaches that most people are traveling on a highway to Hell and
destruction (Matthew 7:13-14). God doesn't play games. You go through Jesus
to Heaven or you burn in the Lake of Fire. It's that simple. A poll
revealed that only 7% of Americans believe the Bible. It is any wonder why
America has gone to Hell in a wheelbarrow?

A genuine man of God preaches with authority, because the Bible is an
authoritative Book, authored by an authoritative God. God is the divine
Lawgiver. God is the Final Authority and His Word, Sola Scriptura, stands
as the Final Word.

This is why so many people hate the precious King James Bible—It is
Authoritative. Feminists hate an authoritative husband, and an
authoritative pastor and an authoritative God.

Автор Chaplain Bob Walker B. Th. (1 месяц)
King James was not a sodomite. the strongest language AGAINST SODOMY is in
the King James Bible. No "gay friendly" church uses the KJV Bible for a
good reason. Sodomy is called an abomination. No queer king would allow
that in their Bible. The KJ Bible says sodomites are to be put to death.

Lev 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both
of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them. (Would a sodomite allow that in HIS
bible?) NO

Автор King James Institute (4 месяца)
People that watch this video and others in this series and still choose the
corrupted and perverted Bibles likely are bound mentally. They can see but
can not perceive. They hear but can not understand. Many of them are
teaching the Bible here and in other places without authority, education,
order, or decency. How dare they preach and teach the Bible without
education or authority! They are arm chair scholars full of rebellious
pride. These apostates are as filthy as any creature that crawls the earth.
Don't engage them dear friends. If this video can't help them then they are
not going to be reached by any man. Only God can help them. Many of them
Nash their teeth in the face of God and that's why they are bound in
darkness. They choose their Bibles because it's what "They Like." They
don't care about what God likes. Separate yourselves from the apostate. You
will know them by the filth that comes out of their mouth. They are filthy
dreamers and like to talk about sexual abomination. They love to talk about
themselves. They cling to filthy teaching that comes from their
understanding or science and or apostate publications. They are proud and
boastful. They typically will try to change the topic in order to distract
the faithful. They will nearly always try and discredit a source without
even considering the content. Their claim is typically that the source is
bias. They are completely unaware of the procedures for investigatory
research yet believe themselves to be experts on the subject. There tactics
seldom change. If what you hear doesn't line up with the truth or there is
some confusion it is usually because there is deception involved. The fact
is that the organizations which publish both of the texts which underline
the new Bibles (UBS/NA) have an agreement in writing with the Vatican which
requires them to meet the standards of the Catholic Church. I expose this
truth in my videos on the KJV. The manuscripts they use as a foundation for
those texts come from Egypt and are not complete and contain corrections,
strikethroughs, blank spaces where missing text should be located, and
conflicting information, and data that is not clear or verifiable (2
somewhat complete and 15 bits and pieces). There is a reason we believe
that the KJV is the pure and preserved word. It comes from manuscripts from
Antioch which have been preserved to the Jot and Tittle. The easy reader
has has a great deal of money pushed in behind it. The corporations are
making big money selling that copyrighted material which must contain 10%
change every time a new copyright is issued. The most wealthy organization
in the world (The Catholic Church) is behind them. Have you studied some of
the owners and corporations that publish those new Bibles? They are as
wicked as anything that crawls the face of the earth. Te greatest Bible
preachers and scholars the world has ever known have and or still preach
and teach from the KJV which comes from the most complete and reliable
(5000+) Manuscripts which are from Antioch.

It's hard work to try and undo the damage that the filthy apostate does so
I am constantly working as a true gospel preacher should. Doctrines that
have been abolished in the new Bibles such as the NIV and the NASB-->

1. The believer's baptism - Acts 8.37
2. The deity of Christ - 1 Tim 3.16; Luk 2.33; Act 4.27;
3. The Trinity - 1 Jn 5.7
4. Doctrine of poverty - 1 Tim 6.5
5. The Blood redemption - Col 1.14

The truth about new Bible versions-->

1) the manuscripts which are the foundation for your new Bible and every
other new Bible in mass publication today are incomplete there isn't a
single one of them that exists that is complete. They have errors, blank
spaces, corrections and read like a much corrected rough draft. The fact
that they are incomplete is proof positive that they are not the perfect
and preserved word of God.

2) Of the incomplete Alaxandrain or Egyptian Texts there are only 2
somewhat complete and 17 all total mostly bits and pieces.

3) They come from Egypt a place of known corruption whereas mine come from
Antioch a place where the first Christian Church was established. It was
evangelized by people such as the apostle Peter. It is the place where
Christians were first called Christians.

4) The organizations which translate texts which are formed from the
corrupted Egyptian manuscripts (UBS/NA) both have an agreement in writing
with the Vatican which insures that the texts must meet the requirements of
the Catholic Church.

5) There are 5000+ manuscripts from the area in and around Antioch and many
of them have been preserved and are complete and perfect to the Jot and
Tittle. Therefore, the Bible that is translated from these manuscripts can
truly be called the pure and preserved word God and are in alignment with
the promise and power of God to preserve His word perfectly. This is the
line of manuscripts which is the foundation for the KJV.

6)The word, deity of Christ, and Bible doctrine is changed and or
diminished in the New Bibles with an obvious slant toward the Catholic
faith.

7) There were more people in Biblical times corrupting the word of God and
likewise today Bible prophesy tells us that in the end times men will not
endure sound doctrine. That time is now.

-->The apostate is unable to disprove even a single point. I have
researched them all and can back up my data. The filthy false teacher
prefers to change the subject and avoid the facts. Misdirection, lies, and
wicked unfounded accusations are their only option. Their mind is bound and
their heart is hardened so they can't understand or perceive the truth. I
can't reach them. Only God is going to be able to help the filthy apostate.
They are perverts or filthy dreamers and they love the world so much that
they cling to it and gnash their teeth in the face of God.

Автор Bob Berney (1 месяц)
I have offered to debate publicly and video the debate to all anti-King
James people. I have offered to pay round trip air fare, hotel, and meals,
AND pay for time as well. I have also offered to pay for each and every
error that anyone can PROVE in a King James Bible. NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON
HAS TAKEN THE CHALLENGE. A couple did at first but backed out later and
never contacted me again.
Face the Devil and he will flee from you.

Автор pastormarkm (4 месяца)
I challenge all you KJV only proponents to put your faith in the KJV to the
test. Mark 16:18 says you will pick up poisonous snakes and drinking
poison will not kill you. This is noted in NASB and ESV as not being in
the earliest manuscripts, but you have faith that it is from God, so you
best start living it out...

Автор Joachim Moeller (5 месяцев)
This is something every christian should know!!

Автор Epoch Of Yore (5 месяцев)
EPIC TRASH!!! So sick of the KJV defenders!!! We now have the dead sea
scrolls etc and so on. The KJV was AUTHORIZED by MAN not GOD! Sorry I would
rather use my HCSB that uses transcripts not even know in 1611.......
Before you KJV defenders jump in I would like to you remind you that people
in Russia and China going threw a HUGE revival do not have the KJV and I
assure you they will be saved. His argument on Antioch is such CRAP!!!! If
this is the case we should all be speaking Greek/Hebrew/Aramaic and your
video alone invalidates your original argument. 

Автор La F (20 дней)
Why is Sam Gipp such an awful man? He didn't have to ruin his coffee! Poor
guy...

Автор Streicher Liker (28 дней)
This is a BS story. How about being honest about the original language.
Jews are the antichrist and these pastors know it. White people are Israel.
Jew is a word that should never appear in the Bible. Greek Bibles are hated
by the lying jews did not write their corrupt version until after the both
testaments were written and they fed it to St.Jerome. There were no Jews
before Judaism even though they existed as the children of Satan and known
by different names. Biblical hebrew looks Phoenician

Автор King James Institute (5 месяцев)
KJV Rules. It is superior to any other versions in ever way. People honor
themselves. They don't care about what God wants. They have the nerve to
pick up an easy reader based on manuscripts out of Egypt that is based on
17 partial manuscripts that do not agree with each other or any other
manuscript in existence and compare it to a Bible authorized by God's
anointed the King of the English speaking world, put together by the fines
group of scholars ever assembled, based on 5000+ manuscripts out of Antioch
a place evangelized by such people as The Apostle Peter, The place of the
first Christian Church and the Place where followers of Christ were first
called Christians. Many of the Manuscripts from this are agree with each
other to the jot and tittle. There is not even a "i" missing a dot or a "t"
not crossed. Quit embarrassing yourself and quit dishonoring God. Get
yourself a good KJV Bible and study. Your best doesn't cut it if you aren't
going to study. Which KJV you might ask? There is only one 1611. There are
editions that are published to correct the numerous spelling and printing
errors. There was not standardized spelling in 1611 and so spelling varies
in the different printings. There were in fact 2 editions of The Holy Bible
(KJV) printed in 1611. Get with the program and stop trying to discredit a
source and not consider the content. It's not about what you like or what
version you prefer it's about what God likes. Abandon your ego and let go
of your pride and consider the facts or the truth. Most scholars prefer the
Cambridge and it's what I recommend. If I need to be more specific give me
a shout back. I can clean and insert your Binky and powder and pamper your
bum too. No really I don't mind helping but I am not interested in a
debate. It's like defending a lion. God's word doesn't need defending. If
you want to reject the truth then that might just be God's will. After all
there are many pretenders in the church. They have to change their
language, music, attitude, etc on Sunday morning. They are as fake as the
Bibles that tote. I Believe a man can be saved from a new Bible but I also
believe they are perverted and corrupted. They have just enough gospel in
them the fool most people. But that works for the believer because they
have enough truth in them to save. Jesus is a friend to sinners. I love you
enough to tell you the truth. Don't hate me for it. 

Автор twfourofsix (1 месяц)
Bibliolatry! Jesus was not born in 1611.

Автор TheBranden86 (1 месяц)
im not saying the kjv is wrong im saying the history this guy is pushing
has to be

Автор Kris B (1 месяц)
Wow. I want to believe this man is a Christian. He seems so sincere. But
he is blatantly lying about all of the evidence. He is saying that the
modern translations "take out" 1 John 5:7 because the Alexandrian's didn't
believe in the Trinity??? We know that is NOT TRUE. This man has to know
that. He's not stupid. We know 1 John 5:7 is NOT in the ancient
manuscripts, and it was added in later. This is a fact, and this man has
to know this. This means he must be lying about it. I see no other
option. The same is true when he says other verses have been taken out.
We aren't comparing the NIV to the KJV. We are comparing both to the
best, most plentiful, oldest, and most reliable manuscripts we have. We
can't take out what wasn't there.

Автор Robert Bowrosen (1 месяц)
This is a great series!!!!!!

Автор xXChristPeripheralXx (1 месяц)
lol, Sam Gipp has been owned so many times for his false teaching..

Автор TheBranden86 (1 месяц)
there is one problem here with me and that is that he says the transcripts
from Alexandria was incorrect but my history tells me that the library of
Alexandria was destroyed by the romans which is now I see y they destroyed
it, y do you destroy a library that has all the information gathered to one
place there is only one reason and that is to destroy the true history

Автор Bob Berney (1 месяц)
The King James Bible is THE Word of God PRESERVED in English without error.
It is the Inspired Word of God.

Автор tractmanKJV (2 месяца)
Amen! Awesome video

Автор Child Of A Living God (2 месяца)
Whats the Big Deal about the KJV? - Sam Gipp

Автор Dustin King (2 месяца)
The KJVists who still adamantly ignore all of the translation problems,
manuscript problems, outdated English expressions and many more problems in
the KJV are incredible. Or perhaps an example of human stubbornness. 

Автор hect190-909 (6 месяцев)
It is sad to see a Christian resorting to misinformation and dumbing-down
centuries of biblical scholarship to promote his Johnny-come-lately
KJV-only talk. All I hear is pride, text-worship, anti-intellectualism and
a hateful motivation. He's no different than conspiracy nuts who hold on to
something they think they know and denounce others for not being the same.
In this case he thinks he knows biblical texts. He doesn't.

Автор Stephen Anderson (3 месяца)
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. (Rom
8:14 )
Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of
water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. (Joh 3:5
) However, you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit
of God dwells in you. But if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he
does not belong to Him. (Rom 8:9)

It seems having the Holy Spirit and being led by Him makes one a Christian,
not having a King James Bible. In fact, one can be a Christian and never
see a bible at all. On the other hand, one can have a multitude of bibles
and go to hell.
Notice, the king james bible seems to be Mr. Gipps god, for he seldom
speaks of Christ. Or perhaps he thinks the Bible is Christ,
transubstantiated into paper and ink. He extolls a translation made by men
rather than honoring the God who speaks through the Bible. The Bible calls
Christ Jesus "the Word of God" and directs us to love, worship, and obey
Him. We are saved by the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ --not
faith in the perfection of a translation of the Bible.

Like the Scribes and Pharisees of Jesus day, too many fundamentalists honor
the text of the Scriptures while neither understanding nor doing what it
says. Fundamentalism in its beginning was simply holding firm to the
fundamentals of historic and biblical Christianity. Then some of it
degenerated into this kind of stuff.

I believe in the fundamentals of the faith, but that does not make me a
Christian. I believe in the accuracy and authority of the Bible, but
neither does that make me a Christian. I am a Christian because God in His
grace sent His Son to die on a cross for my sins and when He saw me lying
in my own vomit He had compassion on me --worthless and wicked as I was.
Christ came into the world to save sinners like me. He alone is the
perfect Word of God and in Him alone is God perfectly revealed.

(pastor) Stephen Anderson

Автор Chaplain Bob Walker B. Th. (9 месяцев)
Greg settle is lying again. King James was not a sodomite. the strongest
language AGAINST SODOMY is in the King James Bible. No "gay friendly"
church uses the KJV Bible for a good reason. Sodomy is called an
abomination. No queer king would allow that in their Bible.

Автор Truth Seeker (4 месяца)
King James Institute - So I suppose you greatly "admire" the "woman drunken
with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus"
Rev 17:6

You KJV worshippers are to be pitied!

Автор Melsina Iglesias (4 месяца)
Excellent demonstration ! Halleluyah

Автор itsyoureternalsoul (4 месяца)
This is really good if you want to continue worshipping the KJV. Can the
Bible version be an idol? What theological doctrines are different based
on other versions? Oh Yeah, The King James Only "Doctrine"

Автор boggymark1 (7 месяцев)
Acute paranoia and compulsive plagiarism are the chief reasons that
Counter-Reformation propagandists lie about the inerrant King James Bible
in Modern English, and there is no scientific basis for the failed theories
of Darwinists like Westcott and Hort. Charles Darwin was a laughingstock
across the British Empire and the United States during his own lifetime
because his silly hypotheses contradicted the integrity of the species,
none of which has ever evolved into another genus, as the inerrant King
James Bible bears record today.

Автор LaDonna Woodley (4 месяца)
what a great explanation. thank you for the clear and concise reason why
the King James is the "big deal"

Автор Craig Luchin (5 месяцев)
One thing about being saved out of a MV, this doesn't happen. Why? Well,
MV's are from the KJB or the texts that gave it. So MV's take "the truth"
from the KJB into their own versions, and then the person is saved by "the
truth" rewritten from the KJB. But the real problem is, is that if a person
gets "saved" in a MV, he or she may think that they are "being" saved, not
"are saved", because the MV's teach salvation plus works. On top of this,
with a MV, you can prove that you must earn your salvation, with the KJB
you can not. Salvation in the KJB is always "by the blood" for salvation.
In MV's it's sometimes 'by blood' plus works. Confusing, for sure. Also,
the MV's remove around 5 to 25 times the words "by the blood" in reference
to salvation "by the blood" of Christ. But the worse thing about MV's is
that they discredit Jesus Christ as God. This is the key point I always use
when confronting other whom confess Christ, but are in MV's. Satan hates
Jesus. The MV's confirm this fact. 

Автор peterchido1 (5 месяцев)


Автор MrSaMuRaNGx (5 месяцев)
Excellent presentation.

Автор thelastroadrunner (6 месяцев)
*Myths About the King James Bible.*
MYTH 4- “King James Bible readers are dividing the Church of Jesus Christ
because they refuse to accept the modern English Bibles.”

The King James Bible is the culmination of Reformation Bibles published in
AD1611. Since that time no scholar has ever found an error in it (except
for spelling and punctuation which did not affect doctrine). Some 270
years later a few Anglo-Catholics (Counter-Reformers) conspired to “revise”
the King James Version to update the language and correct any errors. This
following passage is from Dr Frank Logsdon who was a cofounder of the NASB
who was later led by the Lord to repent of his apostasy-

“But nevertheless, they [the Revisers who produced the Revised Version of
1881/3] didn't have enough to revise. So what are they going to do? Well,
two brilliant Cambridge scholars by the name of Dr. Hort and Dr. Westcott
had been collaborating on a new Greek text built on the Codex Sinaiticus
and the Codex Vaticanus [Roman texts known and rejected by the Church]
which they believed were the very best manuscripts, held by Rome. So they
said to the committee when they saw there wasn't enough to revise-I don't
know if they said these exact words, but they said, "We would suggest that
we bring about a new version." And they had those men pledge themselves to
secrecy that they wouldn't tell anybody about the text they were using
until after the book was out. Afraid, I guess that they would be curbed,
that the King of England or somebody would prevent them.

Twice British royalty refused to have anything to do with the 1881
revision. But at any rate it was deception to begin with. Their own text
hadn't even been published yet, hadn't stood the scrutiny of the public. So
the 1881 was built upon that. And the only fundamentalist who stayed on the
board was Dr. F.H.A. Scrivener, and before he died he felt he had to break
his promise to this group of men, and he let the world know that they took
advantage after advantage in the text. That's where we've gotten the number
of something like 5,337 deletions. [That was his count.] And he said,
"Every time I raised an objection I was voted down, and they took liberties
with God's Word." He was right there at almost every meeting, and he
revealed that to the world before he died.”

The Revisers produced their unauthorized version which was filled with
doctrinal errors and departed from the Traditional Text in thousands of
places. They used the apostate texts of Tischendorf and Westcott & Hort
instead of the thousands of manuscripts which had been researched and
accepted by the Church of Christ. According to the monumental work of Dean
Burgon, The Revision Revised, which has never been answered, Westcott &
Hort’s basis for following just two rejected manuscripts was proven to be a
lie. It was Tischendorf, Westcott & Hort who “divided the Church” by
departing from the Words of God which were clearly and irrefutably
established in the English language 270 years previous.

Anyone who follows the lead of Westcott & Hort and the other “Revisors” by
reading apostate pseudo-bibles like the NIV, NASB, ESV, RSV, WEB, NEB,
NKJV, NLT etc. Is working divisively against the Word of God because they
are departing from the KJV without cause.

Автор Thomas Smith (11 месяцев)
+David Powell here's a little drama to explain a little more about what we
talked about the other night.
+Seth Alexander and +Karen Alexander thought you'd enjoy this as well. 

Автор Mark Rupert (6 месяцев)
Bull

Автор thelastroadrunner (6 месяцев)
*Myths About the King James Bible.*
MYTH 3- “Modern bible translations don’t have Matthew 17.21 because there
is no early evidence supporting it’s inclusion in the New Testament canon.”

Nothing could be further from the Truth. This from Dr Peter Ruckman in his
book The Christians Handbook of Biblical Scholarship-

“...every known cursive but ONE had the King James reading. The reading is
found in the Old Latin and the Vulgate it is found in the Coptic versions,
the Slavonic versions, the Syriac versions, the Armenian versions, and the
Georgian versions; it is also cited 120 years before the Trash Can Version
(Sinaiticus) or the wine VAT beer CAN with US (“B”) was written; and it is
found in eleven Church Fathers before A.D. 550.”

The false manuscripts Aleph and B (upon which the lie of the modern
versions is based) which omit this passage are so completely devoid of
reliability that they even disagree with each other over 3000 times in the
gospels alone!

Автор TheLegacyHero (7 месяцев)
This was a very good description by Sam Gipp of the King James only
debate. Indeed, I concur, we can not accept a text written by heretics as
authoritative and condemn a text preserved by bible-believing Christians
who were martyred for their loyalty.

Автор Corey Richard (7 месяцев)
I like to read the KJV because it's what I feel God always leads me to
read. If I don't understand something, I will go to another version, or
commentary, until I get something cleared up, or have a different view
point, and then use that to allow God to lead me to the Truth of the
scripture. I use to read NIV, but since coming back to the faith, and
totally turning my life over to God, I just can't read anything else. I
don't hold anything against anyone for reading other versions (unless it's
that Message poem stuff, please get away from that) I just really feel God
move alot more in the scriptures, reading the KJV. I would recommend anyone
doing an in depth Bible study to atleast read the KJV as they go along. The
whole tone shifts, and the way things are reworded, the meaning falls flat
in some areas of the new versions. Also, all these new versions are VERY
new, whereas the KJV has been around for centuries. Wonder why? It's like
all these new vehicles. Breaking down all the time, wish I had my old
faithful back.

Автор thelastroadrunner (6 месяцев)
*Myths About the King James Bible.*
MYTH 2- “The Textus Receptus is a critical text combining only 7 Greek
manuscripts”

The Textus Receptus represents the scholarly refinement of Greek
manuscripts from all over the world. Erasmus was a world renowned scholar
of his time and one of the most prolific writers of all time. This from
Edward Hills-

"When Erasmus came to Basel in July 1515, to begin his work, he found five
Greek New Testament manuscripts ready for his use. ... Did Erasmus use
other manuscripts beside these five in preparing his Textus Receptus? The
indications are that he did. According to W. Schwarz (1955), Erasmus made
his own Latin translation of the New Testament at Oxford during the years
1505-6. His friend John Colet who had become Dean of St. Paul's, lent him
two Latin manuscripts for this undertaking, but nothing is known about the
Greek manuscripts which he used. He must have used some Greek manuscripts
or other, however, and taken notes on them. Presumably therefore he brought
these notes with him to Basel along with his translation and his comments
on the New Testament text. It is well known also that Erasmus looked for
manuscripts everywhere during his travels and that he borrowed them from
everyone he could. Hence although the Textus Receptus was based mainly on
the manuscripts which Erasmus found at Basel, it also included readings
taken from others to which he had access. It agreed with the common faith
because it was founded on manuscripts which in the providence of God were
readily available."

The following quotation from D'Aubigne's diligent historical research also
indicates that Erasmus had access to more textual evidence than his modern
detractors admit:

"Nothing was more important at the dawn of the Reformation than the
publication of the Testament of Jesus Christ in the original language.
Never had Erasmus worked so carefully. `If I told what sweat it cost me, no
one would believe me.' He had collated many Greek MSS. of the New
Testament, and was surrounded by all the commentaries and translations, by
the writings of Origen, Cyprian, Ambrose, Basil, Chrysostom, Cyril, Jerome,
and Augustine. ... He had investigated the texts according to the
principles of sacred criticism. When a knowledge of Hebrew was necessary,
he had consulted Capito, and more particularly Cecolampadius. Nothing
without Theseus, said he of the latter, making use of a Greek proverb."

Автор Greg Settle (7 месяцев)
Roadrunner I wouldn't bring up baptism if I were you. The KJV translators
REFUSED to translate the Greek word for Baptism, instead choosing to
"transliterate" it! Meaning they just spelled it out in English. If they
had translated it, it would have conflicted with their Catholic/Anglican
practice of sprinkling instead of baptism. They did the same thing with
"Deacon" which should have been translated "servant" instead of the high
office as the Catholics & Anglicans practice it! The FACT that the Roman
Catholic Apocrypha was contained in the AV1611 is undeniable proof of
Catholic influence. But I know you don't care about facts, because you have
been "bewitched" by uneducated KJVonly's!

Автор EtScripturaeSanctae (7 месяцев)
Although Darwinism blossomed into the Third Reich, the Nazi regime
collapsed in 1945, but the contemporary tragedy on a global scale is that
the neo-Darwinists want to peddle their corrupt revisionism and empty
neo-Nazi rhetoric around the world more than ever.
Despite polluted torrents of convoluted Darwinian propaganda here and
abroad, both the accuracy and clarity of the inerrant King James Bible are
unrivalled in any modern language today--just as they have been since 1611.
Conversely, the corrupt revisionism of Darwinist and occultist apostates
like Wescott and Hort was the epitome of heresy and blasphemy.

Автор Tim Ford (7 месяцев)


Автор sportsloverism (8 месяцев)
if you want to grow vastly as a christian or be a real bible student you
use the king
James version

Автор boggymark1 (7 месяцев)
Pontius Pilate, who wrote the death warrant of the Jesus of Nazareth, said
that he found "no fault" in the only-begotten Son of God according to the
infallible Holy Scriptures in any language as the inerrant King James Bible
bears record in fully legible English, but illiterate cyber frauds,
neo-Nazi plagiarists and atheist liars still slander Him as a "criminal"
today. The Lord Jesus Christ is the author and finisher of my faith. εν ω
εχομεν την απολυτρωσιν δια του αιματος αυτου την αφεσιν των αμαρτιων In
the infallible King James Bible, that Koine Greek text reads, "In whom we
have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins" (Col. 1:14
).

Автор Sir Wolfgaar (8 месяцев)
My understanding is that King James himself had nothing to do with the
scholarship of the KJV, he merely put his own mark on it when the men were
done with their work -- primarily to vaunt himself. I've heard a lot of
bad stuff about King Jim historically, but none of it reflects upon the
Authorized Version of the Bible that bears his insignia.

Автор thelastroadrunner (6 месяцев)
*Myths about the King James Bible.*
MYTH 1- “No Greek manuscript matches the King James Bible”
The King James Bible matches perfectly the Traditional Text most accurately
represented by Beza’s Greek NT and the Masoretic Tanakh. There is one
group of apostates that do not know this and that is those who oppose God’s
eternal Words – “Heaven and Earth shall pass away, but my Words shall not
pass away.” (Matt 24.35)

Автор Andy Osborne (8 месяцев)
I'm ESV only ;-)
Try to find an ancient greek manuscript that is exactly like the textus
receptus; it doesn't exist.

Автор curiousonlooker042 (8 месяцев)
Does anyone know what college they are at?

Автор EtScripturaeSanctae (7 месяцев)
ιησους χριστος χθες και σημερον ο αυτος και εις τους αιωνας διδαχαις
ποικιλαις και ξεναις μη περιφερεσθε καλον γαρ χαριτι βεβαιουσθαι την
καρδιαν ου βρωμασιν εν οις ουκ ωφεληθησαν οι περιπατησαντες
Translated flawlessly into the perfect English of the inerrant King James
Bible, that ancient Koine Greek text reads: "Jesus Christ the same
yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Be not carried about with divers and
strange doctrines. For it is a good thing that the heart be established
with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been
occupied therein" (Hebrews 13:8,9).

Автор alexmcginness (8 месяцев)
Ruckman in all his prolific writings has not told us specifically where the
“final, absolute, written authority of God” was between the time the
original manuscripts passed off the scene and 1611. To believe in the KJV
as the final authority would actually mean that the original manuscripts
were not the final authority, because a true final authority can never be
replaced. to designate the KJV as the final absolute authority is to demean
the original manuscripts and the sources the KJV translators used in their
translation.Ruckman invented the "Alexandrian Cult" fantasy.


Ruckman demands a final authority that “anyone can read, teach, preach, or
handle.” Therefore, by default everyone since the era in which the
originals passed off the scene until people began to believe the KJV was
the absolute authority would also have to be members of the Alexandrian
Cult to remain consistent. Ruckman is clearly uncomfortable with the
question of final authority for other languages before 1611

Вставка видео:

URL 
Ссылка 

Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>

Видео

Seo анализ сайта