Frank Znidarsic's Theory for Podkletnov Effect

To discuss this video in detail, post links and more, please visit the AlienScientist Discussion Forums:

Richard Feynman once said "It doesn't matter how smart you are, or how brilliant your theory is. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's WRONG!" I'd really like to see if this theory is wrong, but I don't think it is. At least until someone can show me how and why it fails. So far it's only given right answers. You get the Compton wave of the electron, the radii and intensities of spectral emissions, and it explains why everything looked so confusing through the only lenses which 1930s science permitted.

The mathematical achievements of the past century are astounding in retrospect to such a simplified theory of quantum mechanics. Yet the math gives us real answers, and tells us these abstract hyperdimensional modelings was just the speed of light refracting into the electron shell which behaves like a Bose Condensate. The first Bose Condensate wasn't created until 2003, the great scientists never performed experiments with large diameter rotating superconductors, so how could they possibly have known or seen this???

The Original Paper:

A-reconciliation-of-Quantum-Mechanics-and-Special-Relativity: http://www.scribd.com/doc/33043355/A-reconciliation-of-Quantum-Mechanics-and-Special-Relativity

Frank Znidarsic "The Duality of Matter and Waves":

Background and additional info:

Schrodinger and Dirac Equations:

Bose-Einstein Condensate:

Harvard Bose Condensates stop and restart light:

Frank Znidarsic:
"I was part of the NASA team and am in your pictures to prove it. We attempted the experiment twice. In both attempts, we made several large SC disks, but never developed the rotation apparatus to test them."

There are only two NASA published reports from this work:

Static test for a gravitational force coupled to type II YBCO superconductors, LI N. (1) ; NOEVER D. (2) ; ROBERTSON T. (2) ; KOCZOR R. (2) ; BRANTLEY W. (2), Physica. C. Superconductivity, 1997, vol. 281, no2-3, pp. 260-267.

This work was using an industrial gravity measuring device on non-rotating, non-two layer small SC samples. Generally this report was wrong as this device was designed to measure long term (10 of minutes to hrs) gravitational effects. Therefore, any conclusion about the SC gravity effects should not have been published at all using the technique reported. Also, as non-rotating, non-two layer SC samples were used, this report has no bearing on the Podkletnov experiments.

Fabrication of large bulk ceramic superconductor disks for gravity modification experiments and performance of YBCO disks under EM field excitation, Ronald J. Koczor and David A. Noever (NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL), AIAA-1999-2147, AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 35th, Los Angeles, CA, June 20-24, 1999.

This was only about fabrication.

Plus two in house reports:

Granular Superconductors and Gravity, Noever, David and Koczor, Ron, NASA no. 19990023209. NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop Proceedings; UNITED STATES; 1999.

This is the same as the first one above.

Superconductor-Mediated Modification of Gravity? AC Motor Experiments with Bulk YBCO Disks in Rotating Magnetic Fields, Noever, David A, Koczor, Ronald J and Roberson, Rick, NASA no. 19990019627.

A non-two layer SC sample was used. Therefore, this report has no bearing on the Podkletnov experiments.

Exploration of anomalous gravity effects by magnetized high-Tc superconducting oxides, Glen A. Robertson, Ron Litchford, Bryan Thompson and Randall Peters, AIAA 2001-3364.

ed these effects:

As far as Tajmar and the ESA replications:
Their first report denied the effect:

However they later came out and confirmed the tests:

I just uploaded the Excel Spreadsheet with the radii, I am going to go through and do the intensities of spectral emissions next but check these out for now if you're interested:

Here is an interesting .PDF by Boeing on their research into Gravity:

Просмотров: 257134
Длительность: 9:9
Комментарии: 833

Тэги для этого Видео:

Найти больше видео в категории: "28"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Автор john doe ( назад)
This guy did not discover this. Research it.

Автор Jap2485 ( назад)
it is amazing the amount of dickhead scientists that are allowed to voice
their opinion into the public eye, this needs to stop. I personally think
once you become a scientist you shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the
public domain accept schools/ universities keep them away from tv, and
literature that goes out to the public because they should all be working
towards a greater good not arguing the toss about who's right and wrong,
you don't know everything and half the time science is wrong doesn't that
tell you as a scientist that there might be something new to learn.

Автор Yoga Ashram ( назад)
You make a lot of assumptions about what gravity and photons are. When they
say there is an 'n' percent chance an electron may be anywhere in the
universe, it does not mean the electron can magically appear somewhere
without having been subjected to forces that got it there. An electron can
only be where it got to naturally, in one place at a time. In a wire with
current flowing in it, which atom is entrained to which electrons? Which
electrons to each other?

Автор Hhydrogen4Power ( назад)
Love this shit

Автор Paul Winger ( назад)
A little help! I clicked on your Alien Scientist link above and got
nothing. Something must be wrong with my computer....AGAIN!

Автор misa lazovic ( назад)
this is just awesome , alien scientist you rule dude!!! i have an idea
forming in my mind already. i forgot i saw this!

Автор Mark CreekWater ( назад)
awe-some descriptions !! 

Автор DaShneeko ( назад)
I love these videos

Автор brooke Mackenzie ( назад)
I have been reading that the theory of photons being a wave and a particle
are wrong and that light is a field. What do you think?

Автор leewardstyle ( назад)
I think photons move much the same way a "Stadium Audience Wave" moves.
E.g. Pure illusion.

Автор Marios Damoulianos ( назад)
From all the commentators over here, I doubt there is a single one who
truly understands the mathematics behind all this.

Автор Pete Vatistas ( назад)
If you back the astrological and tectonic plate clocks back to about 118
thousand years ago, all of those "vent shafts" perfectly line up with the
non-circumpolar stars. The TRULY ancient civilization was one that existed
LONG before the Egyptians VANDALIZED the pyramids. It was another age of
humans that saw their demise, and wanted to build something for our current
age of people to show us that they existed... And they were VERY advanced.
Maybe even had vehicles and computers! Read the book "Fingerprints of the
Gods" by Graham Hancock. You will be convinced.

Автор J.C. Daniels ( назад)
I don't think we will truly master gravity my belief is that we will learn
to cooperate with it. Like a stone skipping across a pond we will learn how
to do the same with gravity waves. Skipping across the cosmos in tremendous
surges of velocity kinda like a Gravity Jump Drive.
Along that learning path may lay other discoveries possibly faster and more
efficient who knows.
It's fun to Imagine isn't it. =)

Автор J.C. Daniels ( назад)
I don't think we will truly master gravity my belief is that we will learn
to cooperate with it. Like a stone skipping across a pond we will learn how
to do the same with gravity waves. Skipping across the cosmos in tremendous
surges of velocity kinda like a Gravity Jump Drive.
Along that learning path may lay other discoveries possibly faster and more
efficient who knows.
It's fun to Imagine isn't it. =)

Автор Christian Simard ( назад)
this sounds strangely similar to the "Searl Effect" any relation in the
basic principles ? 

Автор Reconnective Healing ( назад)
great vid, thanks, will go through it again. =) would be helpful to slow
down the image speed - too fast to follow, really. great content

Автор doltBmB ( назад)
Total nonsense through and through. Try using words that mean something in
sentence structures that create additional meaning. You also cannot dismiss
experiments because they violate a law, since a law is only a law in so far
as it is not contradicted by experiment. You are putting the bathwater
before the baby.

Автор misa lazovic ( назад)
you sound like you know your shit, awesome!

Автор Geoff Burke ( назад)
STOP!!!!!!!!!!!! Your reading of a script is completely confusing. Maybe
you intend to confuse anyone who watched your videos. Creating a video
is a means of communication, your job is to do the communication so the
audience can understand your message. All your videos are scripts which
you read at great velocity.
STOP!!!!!!!! your reading of scripts and actually communicate your
message, slowly, concisely, and completely. Otherwise stop posting any
videos on this video site.
As a former independent technology film producer, I went thur what your are
having difficulty with. People turn off, and run away from your
messages. Does not matter what your message is, if you do not slow down
and talk, (not read) in your messages, no body will even listen. . 

Автор Sergio Frost ( назад)
Very Low screen.

Автор Robert Martin ( назад)
Brilliant. Now I have to watch again stopping the video every few seconds
in order to digest the finer points. 

Автор Anna J ( назад)
I love you!!!

Автор mithras1001 ( назад)
alien scientist...... just one question and i hope its not too personal.
Where do you work and what is your profession?

Автор Louis Snipe ( назад)
-_- just put it on my skateboard already.

Автор DINO FOURKAS ( назад)
You half to shoot 12 lasers in front of your space ship concentrate them at
a point in space and creat a small black whole in front of you shrip and
keep it there while you move through space then to stop do the same behind
you very simple do the math and publish it but don't metion my name

Автор DINO FOURKAS ( назад)
Will the photon release occur at the same state as to get closer to a black
hole,and your so called super fluid has almost the same atomic structure
similar to mercury just add 2 atoms to make it a little more dence

Автор Jeremy Rys ( назад)
Planck's Constant is a fly in the soup of Quantum theory... Glad you found
a fundamental meaning for it Frank. So strange that when you calculate the
spring velocity of an electron-proton 1D Coulomb attraction, and take the
ratio of that velocity to the speed of light you get the Fine Structure
constant... Maybe that's just a coincidence, or maybe it actually means

Автор tristansdew ( назад)
thanks for posting this video !

Автор David Craig ( назад)
Ball lightning defies gravity without knowing Planck's constant or any
physics knowledge at all. Get a clue. 

Автор TheProfiler ( назад)


Автор Adolfo Rios-Pita Giurfa ( назад)

Автор ne1cup ( назад)
very good video... I only understood half of it...thanks

Автор II Noxus II ( назад)
There's still alot to discover when it comes to the physics of gravity, but
I believe it will the way forward in the future, I think ancient
civilisations were more clever than we think, they understood alot more
about the planet than we do now, the incredible things they did can't even
be fully explained today and I think they used their own techniques of
anti-gravity devices, when you think of the possibilites if we unlock the
secrets of anti-gravity, it would change the world; maybe building an
anti-gravity aircraft and using the earth's gravity as a means to travel
would result in the speed of light becoming possible and therefore

Автор SrmthfgRockLee ( назад)
"May the force be with you!"

Автор Robert Galletta ( назад)
I am not sure but could this effect help the Quantum Computer guys ?

Автор inagod ( назад)
gravity is pushing us down,through the bending of space time right ?.So
even though it is a very weak force pushing us and everything down,you
would have to some how alter space time to control the effect of it and
that would require incredible amounts of energy.Do I make any sense or I'm
I way off base ?.Thanks

Автор Geoffrey Hillend ( назад)
Phonons are wave packets in mater like individual particles or photons. An
individual photon goes through both slits at the same time since the
Feynman sum over the histories proves that one photon follows all possible
paths simultaneously. See Grand Design, Hawkiing, and The Quantum world;

Автор Geoffrey Hillend ( назад)
Phonons are not sound waves; sound waves in matter are traverse waves like
light though. Phonons photons or wave packets in matter. The Compton
effect explains Einstein's photo electric effect and is due to the fact
light is a particle or wave packet which knocks out electrons from a
material. Also the double slit experiment proves that light is both a wave
and a particle because individual photons fired one at a time at the double
slit still cause an interference pattern due to the fact that every light
particle is a probability wave.

Автор Nivaldo Cesar ( назад)

Автор Brendan Townsend ( назад)
Yet again we see mathematics explain observable effects hitherto
unexplained, but STILL no explanation of what a photon 'is' other than a
"wave". Well, we observe waves as cyclic events in a period of time, but
that's time in the observer's fixed frame of reference. However, consider
the elusive photon as a quantum of TIME and this could explain the
energistic transfer from the change in orbital electrons to free space (AKA
photon emission). Then, a whole new picture emerges... *Gravity is the
product of time dilation*, and to alter the effective mass under
gravitational influence requires a shift in the time domain relative to
that creating the gravitational force. THEN you can go on to unify gravity
with inertia (time dilation of a moving body as the medium of energy
transfer), and could explain why inexplicable craft counter the effects of
G-forces under sudden acceleration or shift in trajectory. Magnetic fields
are also the result of aligned orbital electrons, the united effects of
which create a 'time vortex' which explains the polar property that
magnetic fields possess. We need UNIFICATION before we can properly
consider how the universe hangs together and break free of focusing on
merely the effects we observe and can mathematically predict.

Автор nimitzopsoi ( назад)

Автор ROGER RABBIT ( назад)
hmmm... @ 7.53 he states that "the speed of light changes..." - how can
the speed of light change? If it slows down then it is no longer 'the speed
of light' and similarly, should you miraculously manage to speed it up it
wouls also not be 'the speed of light.' It would, for all intense and
purposes not be the speed of light but something else??

Автор Clorox bleach ( назад)
تعرف عايض ؟

Автор Daniel Roberts ( назад)
Here is a video that explains quantum locking, which is a real phenomenon.

Sorry guys, this video is a bunch of BS and consists of lies mixed in with
the truth. There are many things wrong with it. Do you want to explain
how empty space has a capacitance AlienScientist?

Автор Andrew Palfreyman ( назад)
This is what happens when hairdressers talk about physics

Автор ThalesPo ( назад)
This is according to string theory, which I think is wrong. But you
misunderstood me; The guy from the video said that light is purely a wave,
but it behaves in the same way as all the other particles in the double
slit experiment; So, if light is purely a wave, all the other particles are
too. Photons pass thru the double slit as a wave and are detected on the
screen behind it as particles, and so do electrons, atoms and all the other

Автор Ratlerzz Azeroth ( назад)
Strings, vibrating strings to be more precisely, but strings of what?

Автор ThalesPo ( назад)
So light is purely a wave? Is there something that is not purely a wave
then? How about the electron or an atom?

Автор PG Gurung ( назад)
Even if there is an antigravity effect, I struggle to see the application.
One can have the antigravity object hovering but energy is still needed for
any useful work. Bit like the hanging bricks in the world of Mario.

Автор doceigen ( назад)
This video continues the YouTube tradition of meme mythological induction,
that number one educated scientists are blind idiots and that number two,
the vernacular of science and technology can be reckoned upon like a
magical incantation, and by simply saying out loud a string of terms and
relationships as a possible recipe, that the mantra will self fulfill for
the true initiates, and the truth will enlighten and set you free.

Автор 360gamingfreak ( назад)
If you can reverse the effects of gravity does that not mean you can create
a gravity field too making a sphere space ship ideal for space travel?

Автор Benjamin Stone ( назад)
"the capacitance of the known Universe...".... right.

Автор MTRE ( назад)
I was there ... I was there and can't to return back the last word of a

Автор Fenix Borges ( назад)
Parabéns a esses magníficos gênios das inovações vocês nos surpreendem, e
todos gostam de coisas curiosas que chamam a atenção.

Автор 1emanres ( назад)
cont'd...This is because the speed limit on light is a feature of space
itself and space itself changes in the presence of the things that generate
space, namely matter,energy,mass,etc.The speed of light is not 186,000
miles per second.Rather,it is infinite,with spacial distortions making it
seem finite..Wrapped around any object approaching that speed is a tightly
distorted cocoon of space and time and distorted matter and energy.Likewise
from ITs point of view the"moving"cosmos. Voila!

Автор 1emanres ( назад)
cont'd...Later in life I came upon a man who was an impersonator,the head
of a university physics department.For a long time he had provided up to
date nuclear technology to the Soviet Union while being blackmailed for his
homosexuality. He came clean once he got old enough to retire and knew the
Soviets would dismember him like he had been dismembering children for the
Soviets. Child murder is a way scammers are controlled sexually...cont'd.

Автор myblackdaddy1 ( назад)
Can you repeat this again, i missed something.

Автор Archie Bunker ( назад)

Автор discopoe ( назад)
"...almost ignored by mainstream sicience". True dude, because it's monkey

Автор Magnetic Man ( назад)
phonons ... can you describe the sound concept further ... is it the
frequency of matter? ... in the beginning there was the word of god ... is
this the universal sound ... phonons? ... maybe we didnt have a "big bang"
it would be more like a big BOOM :o)

Автор Magnetic Man ( назад)
lmao ... thats a good one :o)

Автор BigHuggyBear1 ( назад)
The apparent loss of mass/weight of an object above a spinning
superconductor was reported by both finnish and Russian scientists in the
late 90's and was investigated by NASA but without being able to reproduce
the same results. Its not that science is ignoring results of other
experiments, but just like the faster than light neutrino claim last year
at CERN inevitably its errors that explain the apparent contradiction to
current theories. NASA is testing gravity theories all the time...

Автор stephen green ( назад)
Science has been ignoring experiments that prove that our current view of
space is wrong, is this why we really don't understand gravity? 

Автор jozsef orgovan ( назад)
why are you in a hurry? jumping here and there? pictures shows only for a
second. are you nerves? it is not enjoyable at all. sorry

Автор Maniac Bob ( назад)
I skipped that day when the professor was explaining this, no wonder I
didn't get it.

Автор onimotoko ( назад)
Alright, I'm stupid. I didn't understand a word of this >_<

Автор danielerickson137 ( назад)
I like the question, "Where does the photon come from? " When energy is
applied to say iron for example at some point it turns red hot then white
and eventually it becomes a bright plasma. Are the photons locked inside
the FE atom and released when it is in a high enough energy state? The
gravity question as you mention, is related to the source of the photon
from matter. 

Автор Phil X ( назад)
The energy of a photon is relatively constant, therefore it has a
relatively constant energy. The intensity of the gravity field is VARIABLE,
and can be greater than the energy of a photon,thus black holes can trap or
pull the light inwards in space; and quasars emit light, and most likely
are the most intense anti-gravitational emitters in the universe.
Therefore, I wanted to talk about quasars because knowing how a quasar
works would be the basis for an anti-gravitational model. 

Автор Phil X ( назад)
2-nd part Altough gravity research is relatively new to physics, it does
have a few characteristics: Intensity, and phase. Antigravity is
counteracting the gravity field of an object/s with a generated equal or
greater intensity field that results in a nullification of that
gravitational field,and that has been observed in quasars. 3-rd part below:

Автор Phil X ( назад)
I think gravity is a primordial state of an "energy void". I say "energy
void" ,because it is emitted spherically and it does not have electrical or
spectral characteristics, and is directly related to the relative mass of
the emitter. --- It is also not related to the electrical charge of the
emitter, thus making me say that it's probably caused by neutrons, who
generate it as a subspace wave(at relativistic speed) 2-nd part below:

Автор Brandon Garewal ( назад)
How much would a $10 word be worth now that we know the planet is round
(calculating inflation of course)? Thank you for the vid. I understood just
about half of it but what I didn't I was able to pause and go look up.
Podkletnov and Modanese, the ultraviolet catastrophe and the Copenhagen
interpretation. These are all just pieces to a gigantic puzzle. Regarding
the magnetic fluid, can it be simply ferromagnetic fluid?

Автор Brandon Garewal ( назад)
Do you expect the video to pause long enough for most people to read and
comprehend it all?

Автор madmadmal ( назад)
"..gravitational fields that bind the (atomic) nucleus slip out of
alignment..." What happened to weak nuclear and strong nuclear? When did
gravity become measurable on the quantum scale?

Автор BigHuggyBear1 ( назад)
How about "the physics of the idon vector matrix wave operator"..... haha
mebees not!...

Автор Patrick McKinney ( назад)
Most people don't work for NASA or easa or scientists at all. When science
becomes cool is when laymen understand it. Do you sell a dictionary for all
those $10 words? So either this is really something or its a load of crap.
If you need $ to make something ground breaking, or rather interstellar ,
try speaking plainly. I have never met a millionaire who talks like that.
And I know quite a few.

Автор ArttalentsCom ( назад)
If you are as cocksure as the speed and tone of your voice, why don´t you
just create the craft within a fortnight? May reality be with you and the

Автор MEGA F4IL ( назад)
I wonder how easy it would be able to do things like this if we did things
the way how Nikola Tesla would do it.

Автор Jack Davids ( назад)
What a nerd

Автор doh1959 ( назад)
i listened to this drinking a beer and didnt understand a fukin word of it
but sorta convinced meself i learnt something

Автор Thomas Lewis ( назад)
I'm a skeptic about UFO 's and what they might be,but whats interesting,if
you read some of the ufo reports,sometimes the observer will mention
something that could be a affect of antigravity or a device that repulses
gravity.Granted 99 percent are other natural or man made,hoaxes.

Автор Avenida Gez ( назад)
the geometry of a sphere which would be a rotation of a circle. Just figure
a point traveling along a path which describes a sphere, imagine that path
and it is not a circle, not even possible as circle. That equation will
give the tangent points which lead you to understand the spin and magentic
poles of the atom, so the normal point to changes in diamater due to the
energy wves. The projection of the path must sync the light wave lenght and
frequency to become a photon because they are nodes

Автор Avenida Gez ( назад)
Why there is no study about the linearity of spheres? That would explain
many things about this behaviour, starting by the spin. All give
explanations but nobody has given that equation which is the key between
matter and energy. You have said "Until now the math treatment on such
quantum systems as relied on abstract mathematical notations which try to
explain the observable rather than explain the actual phenomena that is
producing them" Do not confuse with the geometry of a sphere which

Автор Itsmeeman1 ( назад)
Seems like Stan Meyer used a form of high frequency oscillation of
electro-magnetic waves to fracture water, making it both impressive and

Автор Rich Colburn ( назад)
conservation of energy does not eliminate the possibility of generating an
equal amount of dark energy. 

Автор Roberto Paredes ( назад)

Автор BigHuggyBear1 ( назад)
This is not the physics of antigravity, rather a complex explanation of
conversion of a quantum resonance into a propulsive force. Gravity is how
we describe the mutually attractive force between 2 or more energy/masses
as a space time distortion. To achieve antigravity we first need to
establish gravitons exist as per the standard model, and then determine if
the antiparticle ( wave) actually exists, somehow I doubt it!....

Автор pineapplepenumbra ( назад)
Many years ago one of my cats fell into a bath and did, indeed, appear to
levitate, with all 4 legs just stretched out and stiff. She bounced 3 times
down the bath, as if on springs, before somehow leaping out. Luckily, the
water wasn't hot and I wasn't close enough to get clawed.

Автор Cyberdactyl ( назад)
Techno-jargon and bunch of quick flashing pics of equations has yet to
produce any verifiable results. The ONLY thing this video DOES suggest is
the true state of education of the masses, seeing how it has ~96% thumbs

Автор xEnder686x ( назад)
Awesome vid! Once again I find myself up until 5am watching this stuff,
haha time to sleep. No longer processing information fully. Website is ugly
though haha Sorry, I'm a designer, I couldn't help it xD

Автор Spongebob Squarepants ( назад)
Oh wait I thought it just a normal nose bleeding topic, but ohh more than
that... Im now in a hemorrhage...

Автор Jimmy Hart ( назад)
It's so arousing, I can get it up:)

Автор Vedran susic ( назад)
and book is called? 

Автор arsenioan ( назад)
how its called , the book ? 

Автор arsenioan ( назад)
and now in german pls ... 

Автор MrRussCornell ( назад)
This is like using Sound waves to move or change or combined atom
structures forms to larger & smaller sizes of matter. Not much energy comes
from this unless you are using Matter & antimatter to make more energy
output through magnetics.

Автор Mintfriction ( назад)
Well is quite obvious why other materials can't defy gravity. Law of lame:
they're not super cool as superconductors

Автор An artist theory on the physics of 'Time' as a physical process. Quantum Atom Theory ( назад)
Could gravitational potential and electrical potential be linked together?
They both use the inverse square law! In this theory gravity is a secondary
force to the EM force. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest energy
because it has the greatest time dilation! In this theory ‘time’ is an
emergent property formed by each new photon oscillation of vibration. By
the way this is an invitation to see an artist theory of the physics of
‘time’ as a physical process!

Автор AgentPsychopath ( назад)
What's the name of the book?

Автор MrDopekid7 ( назад)
36cp¤ x 1pd x Speed of light₩ x density= ₩~£ .....

Вставка видео:


Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>


Seo анализ сайта