Видео


https://youtube.com/devicesupport



https://youtube.com/devicesupport
http://m.youtube.com


Просмотров: 23,959,318
Добавлено: 1 месяц
Длительность: 3:56
Комментарии:

Тэги для этого Видео:  



Найти больше видео в категории: "Howto"
Видео загрузил: YouTube Help
Показать больше видео, загруженных YouTube Help


Похожие видео:

https://youtube.com/devicesupport

Просмотров: 23959318
https://youtube.com/devicesupport http://m.youtube.com

Комментарии:

Автор Eat My Dust (4 месяца)
The last shooter definitely lacks experience. Not once did I see him follow
through with any of his shots.

As far as comparing the two rifles alongside each other; they are both
excellent. But the biggest separation is the durability of the FN SCAR. Run
the frog test on both of these weapon systems and see what happens to the
AR. 

Автор Kaleb Nickerson (9 дней)
You should've had the same person shoot the guns because each person has
different experience.


Автор miguel angeles (1 месяц)
Fair comparison to me I'd rather get ar 10. Since its still way cheaper
even tho its custom. Why go factory stock when you have so many
modification the you can do on AR platform rifle and make It better 

Автор c d (1 месяц)
"Ace and Gary"- LOL- like from SNL bit

Автор mach533x (1 месяц)
trigger control=fail lol 

Автор BigO4185 (3 месяца)
I purchased a SCAR 17S and I purchased the Handle Defense Aluminum Lower
and now I can use PMAGS or any SR 25 mags! I purchased the VLTOR Adaptor
and now I can use my favorite Magpul stocks. I put on the extended grip
given to me by FN as a Promo and this is the perfect battle rifle! I
purchased the Timney 3 lbs trigger and the X25 drum mag and I have
perfection squared!

Автор Davis Fehrman (3 месяца)
does anyone have thoughts on a scar against a faxon arak? they just came
out with the arak 31, a 308 variant.

Автор Aaron Hughey (10 месяцев)
Awesomeness

Автор Sumanat Wp WP. (6 месяцев)
FN SCAR 17 vs. MEGA AR-10: .308 Shootout @ 600 Ya…:
http://youtu.be/_98MeKrCzwk

Автор Rufus Shipman (6 месяцев)
I don't really care as long as it doesn't fail. Either one is great but,
the ar10 does need a few mods before being as reliable as the scar. The
ar10 can be as reliable as the scar given the right mods.

Автор Lindsay Curran (4 месяца)
I have no room to judge... But comparing a MODDED AR 10 to any stock weapon
7.63 weapon system is not really an accurate comparison.. Compare stock to
stock to get a complete accurate weapons comparison..

Автор Jp ARbuilder (2 месяца)
Giving reviews. Display poor fundamentals.

Автор yd4330 (6 месяцев)
+1 on Ross comment. Terrible trigger control and reset. I expected a
comptent shooter for a proper review for long range work. And everyone
knows the first thing you buy is a super scar trigger. Doesn't matter how
much money you spens on glass if you don't have match trigger and don't
know how to use it properly. 

Автор scotty w (9 месяцев)
is that a cucv? 

Автор 1lostinspace (7 месяцев)
You guys should check out the ACSS HUD DMR reticle,

Автор flspy (6 месяцев)
One more advantage- SCAR 17 shoots .308 with low recoil. A big cartridge
that shoots soft is a major advantage

Автор Ross Jacobs (11 месяцев)
Someone's trigger reset was pretty bad. It was almost like he wanted to
get back off of the trigger as soon as it broke. It's hard to take a
review seriously if the shooter demonstrates lack of follow-through.
Example @ 6:12 = bad technique. He did improve it on a couple of shots.

Автор BlueonGoldZ (2 месяца)
I'd rather have an AR-10 and I already have two including a Mega Arms MATEN
key mod. The SCAR, while it is a good rifle, is WAY too overpriced plus you
have to use proprietary mags which are expensive. Not that my last comment
has anything to do with functionality but the SCAR is a friggin' ugly gun
especially compared to a great-looking AR platform.

Автор rkwjunior (8 месяцев)
I don't think this is an accurate accuracy test, The AR-10 has a match
barrel and JP internals, the SCAR is stock, they should have used a Factory
AR-10, not custom. This says a lot for the SCAR.

In a SHTF scenario i'd take the SCAR, runs like a sewing machine.

Автор bob g (1 год)
did you have a geissele superscar trigger on the 17? It's commonly known
that the purchase of a scar means that you immediately install a superscar,
especially if your going to be doing long range work. It's 200% better, at
least. Transforms the gun.

Автор akg 102 (8 месяцев)
While the SCAR may be light compared to most commercially produced
AR10/LR308 type rifles, it is still over 9lbs scoped. Why not build
something more sleek and handy, while also shooting for lighter recoil with
an LMOS BCG, adjustable gas block, and good brake? I'm not taking it into
battle, so the perceived reduction in reliability will be a non-issue.

Автор E SIALOI (8 месяцев)
Scar17's are nice but at 3k a pop is pretty steep for most and that's about
the only negative I can say. The positives far outweighs the negatives.
When it comes down to accuracy and reliability out of the box it is
unbelievable but compared to an AR10 it isn't really fair because the AR
platform has been around for 57 years. It has evolved and has been
perfected by precision manufacturer's worldwide. FNH has developed a
shorter barrel and manufacturer's will start developing after market parts
as the rifle gains popularity and higher demands for the SCAR's 16 and 17's
platforms. Overall it is a very light, durable and dependable weapons
system that packs a mean punch with the .308 round..Can you ask for more in
a compact design that allows the operator to disassemble and maintain with
a few simple functions. Hope you enjoy and..
Thanks for reading..

Автор akg 102 (8 месяцев)
I currently have a SCAR17 and am starting a Mega MATEN MKM build. I've
calculated the weight of all of the parts and it should come in at ~112.45
ounces. That's almost 15oz lighter than the 17. Granted, the cost is going
to be about 10% higher than the 17, but the weight savings should be worth
it. It's tough to predict accuracy, but it will have a Proof Research heavy
16" carbon fiber barrel; it should be more accurate than the SCAR over the
duration of firing.

Автор mx0069 (9 месяцев)
Great video guys thanks for sharing... I'd like see more of these "vs."
videos comparing accuracy, just not from a vehicle mounted shooting
position. My personal experiences have proven this to be very counter
productive when trying to determine precision... thanks again for the vids
and keep'm coming!

Автор GrapeApeVine (9 месяцев)
holyshit...ive watch this video 5times and just noticed you said what bipod
was on it like 3times....lolololololol

Автор guavasauce (16 часов)
off topic: Ace and Gary? ring a bell for anyone else? SNL?

Автор Chau Nguyen (1 год)
California sucks!!! and I live in CA

Автор Molon Labe (10 месяцев)
Need to add a kestrel 4500 AB to your arsenal

Автор semiautoriflelover1 (1 год)
.308/7.62x51 AR rifles have never been very reliable. Go with Scar. 

Автор roughcutone2 (10 месяцев)
Both shooters have crappy triger pulls for distance shooting

Автор raider6511 (10 месяцев)
Sounds nice. Try the SCAR vs FN FAL. ok

Автор Whitehorze (10 месяцев)
A rifle with a mediocre barrel can be shot well if it's fed ammo that it
likes and has a decent trigger.

Neither of those topics were covered. Good gunporn anyway...

Автор Wolfwolveswolf (1 год)
If I had the money I'd own a SCAR-17 for sure, but I thank G-d for the FAL!

Автор Matthew Witryk (1 год)
Ace and Gary the ambiguously gay duo, lol.... 

Автор TheBarrett107 (1 год)
I'm telling you the Scar is Beast!!!!

Автор Roger Judd (1 год)


Автор BadBrian303 (11 месяцев)
That dude in the middle should stop talking.

Автор Clvmind (10 месяцев)
Finally some people tests assault rifles for the real purpose that they
made for! Most try assault rifles for the distances less than 150
meters/yards but for that range just a MP-5 works perfect, you do not need
any thing more than that! I wish you should also have an AK-47/74 and good
old G-3 to compare with those! As you see, new assault rifles coming out
with less rpm, more accuracy, longer distance, more power etc. compare to
M-4 (as it seen in Afghanistan 7.62 with low rpm works better in battle
field). SCAR 17 is a good example for that! In my own experience G-3 is the
best battle weapon so far, cannot handle dust, mud water ect. as good as
AK, also very heavy but still very accurate and shoot/damages like a
cannon! If you have G-3, MP-5 and M9 Beretta and few hand grenade on you,
battle field is yours! You do not need anything else more than that.

Автор john doe (1 год)
Trigger control to much to ask for?

Автор nunya (1 год)
These rifles have some major differences, for a head to head comparison.
1) Barrels - The AR10 has a heavier barrel and is match grade. I didn't
hear what length it was. The SCAR generally comes with a 16" barrel. If
the AR10 has a longer barrel, ballistics would be different. 2) Weight -
Less weight usually means more recoil. Which this test was a table top. 3)
Gas vs. Piston operating system. Gas systems are inherently more accurate
than piston.

Автор Birddog sixfourtwofour (8 месяцев)
too many crappy mechanics fellas.
And what's with the stupid gloves? Seriously?

Автор Zachery Petersen (1 год)
It's an rifle NOT a gun. Guess Gary was never in the military.

Автор whocaresanyway (1 год)
3k for a scar that even special forces hate or you can build a mint custom
308 for 1500$...that's made by us companies, out of metal....Not plastic.
If I want a toy gun I'll go to Wal-Mart

Автор Johnny Pea (1 год)
where was this video shot? Pretty country.

Автор GrapeApeVine (10 месяцев)
what bipods are those????

Автор PigIron BigIron (1 год)
The ambiguously gay duo? C'mon now...

Автор MrSottobanco (1 год)
How would a KAC Sr-25 stack up against a SCAR 17?

Автор ThaiTan Corner (1 год)
What are you comparing number of hits by each shooters. Is it accuracy
between the two or designs the video just shoe bang bang no definitive data
collected ammo shots info, moa results not much accept displaying the guns
and optics. Good luck on next video just shows 100-200-300 yards shots best
shooter best groups would be more interesting 

Автор Sean Kendor (1 год)
Good job. Nice Video. My 2 cents.. you guys have to do better camera work,
if you want to be semi-professional. Like some of your shots, just a
little off. Maybe one more camera, or a better editor. Either way, good
job.... for just some guys, having fun. 

Вставка видео:

URL 
Ссылка 

Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>

Видео

Seo анализ сайта