Видео


German panzerfaust in action



Video that shows German tankhunters armed with Panzerfausts in action.

(c) Erika KF, www.militaryclub.info


Просмотров: 387947
Добавлено:
Длительность: 0:44
Комментарии: 142

Тэги для этого Видео:



Найти больше видео в категории: "28"
Видео загрузил:
Показать больше видео, загруженных


Комментарии:

Автор Joseph V. Stalin (526 лет назад)
This IS NOT reall footage.

Автор Erwin Rommel ( назад)
fake...

Автор rak1445 ( назад)
Those T-34 are (meant to be) Czech. One of them has "Žižka" written on the
turret. Žižka was Bohemian religious warrior in medieval times.

Автор Vitaly Danilov ( назад)
Wtf? Germans captured American Bazooka in Northern Africa and on the base
of it started a prodaction of Panzerfausts.

Автор LoneRussianS ( назад)
Yes Bazookas producion lines weren't. Panzerfaust lines were.

Автор beardo52 ( назад)
No they were not. As I said, they were lend lease. If the Soviet Military
would have liked them, they would have produced their own version as
Germany did.

Автор LoneRussianS ( назад)
Well, how about to start think by own head? Bazooka production lines
weren't captuired.

Автор beardo52 ( назад)
Well, according to the History of the PanzerFaust, thousands were captured
by the Soviet Military at the end of the War, and they liked it quite alot.
this led to the RPG although it is not a one shot weapon like the Faust .
Through Lend/Lease, many thousands of Bazookas were delivered to the soviet
Army and they used them, but found the Faust to be more effective even if
it had limited range in comparison to the Bazooka, and Panzer Schreck. More
info, is probably online about this.

Автор LoneRussianS ( назад)
My question was about last sentence of that original comment (origin of
development).

Автор beardo52 ( назад)
I do not understand your question. All of the weapons I mentioned including
the Bazooka use the same type of warhead. My joke was about the German
soldier destroying one T-34, leaving him another 50,000 or so to go.

Автор LoneRussianS ( назад)
Why not from Bazooka?

Автор beardo52 ( назад)
HANS: "I have destroyed the Russiche monster!" KLAUS: "Sehr Gut Hans! now
only 50,000 more to go." After reading some of the comments, the Panzer
Faust (Armor fist) was a single use weapon that employed a shaped charge to
burn through its target, just as the Bazooka, and Panzerschreck (a larger
copy of the Bazooka) used. This same type of warhead is used today in most
anti-armor munitions including the well known Soviet RPG series of weapons.
Which the Soviets developed from the Panzerfaust.

Автор MightyMooseKing ( назад)
I'm Canadian who's living in Germany and one of the largest arms factories
of Nazi Germany is just 5km away from my current home, a few years back
some kids also found working weapons and ammo ranging from simple bullets
to even a fully working Panzerschreck. Additionally somebody's apparently
painted an old PanzerIV which is standing in the woods here in really
strange colours like pink or violet. Btw, the arms factory was called
"Muna" if I'm not mistaken.

Автор sr633 ( назад)
I saw after the German surrender, among the weapons turned in - several
sizes of war head on the Panzerfaus weapon.

Автор Alan Thomas ( назад)
Jeez! what a brave man!

Автор Ceadda Keohane ( назад)
Nobody said it was real... only that the weapon was being fired.

Автор huhuyggrrfb ( назад)
panzeschreck was copy of US bazooka, difference was that you PS did stop IS
heavy tanks.

Автор huhuyggrrfb ( назад)
this modern footage try to pretend to be a historical movie :D FAKE

Автор Duffy2013 ( назад)
The only weapon the Germans had plenty of in the fall of berlin the
Panzerfaust. Didnt it explode inside the crew compartment burning those
inside with hot hot fire?

Автор scott walker ( назад)
of course the above film isnt from ww2 :)

Автор Samuel Boas ( назад)
I always see that after they shoot with a Panzerfaust the dipose it. Is it
possible to put another rocket in it just like the rpg-7?

Автор Michele Vogliardi ( назад)
You should play less COD and study more history man....

Автор vaggelis1945 ( назад)
@Trashcansam123 hahaha i meant that panzerschreck was better than Bazooka
in everything! not from panzerfaust...but in my opinion the range is
something very important

Автор Steven Zombek ( назад)
@vaggelis1945 Wrong. The panzerschreck was worse than the Panzerfaust. It
may have had a longer range but not a thicker explosive. The Panzerfaust
could penetrate up to 8 inches.

Автор Michael Akkerman ( назад)
You wouldn't aim a panzerfaust horizontally at a target that far away. You
need to aim it up in the air and fire it underarm.

Автор Flori3058 ( назад)
@mrtrede ja ach neeee -_- das sieht man doch, das die hässlichsten panzer
den russen gehören

Автор vaggelis1945 ( назад)
@m1rock the germans may took the idea for Panzershreck from the bazooka,but
Panzershsreck was better in everything...

Автор eagerbeaver53 ( назад)
@Ruben1994OL you forgot mauser you never forget about mauser or luger or
mercedes or h&K

Автор Leftyotism ( назад)
@powmful buts its still the invention ;) every invention has gotta be
improoved ^^

Автор MIIIIILKY ( назад)
Riiiiiesen Fehler: 1. regel: Lauf, lauf,Lauf. Wenn die dich sehen dann....

Автор TheCoalescent ( назад)
Cool film, but he is holding it strangely.

Автор Серега Чалый ( назад)
Stupid fucks. AK 47 and MP44 are complitely diffirent.

Автор buffuzo ( назад)
I had a toy panzerkampfwagen IV which I blew up with an M-80. It did a lot
more damage to that model than a panzerfaust could do to a t-34.

Автор sr633 ( назад)
While in North Africa, my Uncle was walking close behind a U.S.Sherman tank
when it was hit by a Panzerfaust. He lost an eye and his chin was almost
torn off, it left a nasty scar.. Another soldier in his squad had the heel
of his foot blown off in the same explosion.

Автор dr4g0nfir3 ( назад)
@Moredread25 My grandpa (a young boy at the end of ww2) told me that he
found some grenades (Stielhandgranate) and some bigger ones (from a
88mm-FlaK). They played with that stuff...

Автор VitaminsAndPiss ( назад)
@ablev72 (sighs, knowing that I made that comment one year ago)... I guess
you got a point

Автор Haophil ( назад)
@Lmaox94 ein heute erstellter film der auf alt getrimmt wurde, haha

Автор FlyingSnake110 ( назад)
@fortvaux term "rifle"comes from rifled barrel. Panzerfaust has no rifling
so it is recoilless gun. Depending on language there is distinction between
recoilless gun and recoilless rifle (for example in English there is
distinction in name, in Polish there is none)

Автор m1rock ( назад)
@JheakrynaKyAlur I wasn't talking about the Panzerfaust. I was talking
about the Panzerschreck, which was copied by the Germans from captured US
M9 Rocket Launchers..aka the Bazooka. Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck are to
different weapons.

Автор mikethebassguy ( назад)
@railadvocate What are you some kind of nazi? The germans started the war.
Hitler's plan for the jews came about long before the war. I thought we
killed all of you sorry bastards after nuremburg. Damn must have missed one.

Автор worldwar2freak12 ( назад)
Sol or whatever, your right.

Автор wwwtotalitaerde ( назад)
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during five and a half years by
the German BND, which is the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100
videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured
during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. Markus Bott was
assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my
channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears, the
BND will have assassinated me as well. Martin Bott

Автор Soratris ( назад)
The shamwow was invented by the Germans...... also everyone who comments
with an opinion on the war is a jackass you had nothing to do with it and
are leeching the pride and sacrifice of your forefathers.

Автор IVANGROZNEY ( назад)
What's the difference between a Mercedes and a snail? The snail has the
slime on the outside.

Автор B12G ( назад)
Actually, the 'shaped charge' concept was first experimented with by the
French, then the Germans, Americans, Russians, etc...

Автор ChonKrispyLA ( назад)
wrong. its the same thing with a reusable barrel how is it not based on it

Автор Donaven Scott ( назад)
True true tank combt requiered skill back then nowadays every thing is done
with computers so pound for pound i think the tankers fromm WWII are
superior to the tankers of today

Автор ukrainesuperpower87 ( назад)
"I've always wondered if the RPG-7 was inspired by this panzerfaust." you
wrong. they much different

Автор ukrainesuperpower87 ( назад)
"Rpg's were based on the Panzerfaust Fener4e dummie" rpg-1, rpg-2 - yes
rpg-7 - not based on, nothing to do with panzerfaust!

Автор blindsniper79 ( назад)
@Magni56 exactly quote "Wikipedia quote time: "The Panzerfaust (plural:
Panzerfäuste, "armored fist" or "tank fist") was an inexpensive, recoilless
German anti-tank weapon of World War II.""<---- what you said exactly
proving that it may be a recoiless weapon but is not a recoiless rifle

Автор blindsniper79 ( назад)
@chetcampbell ofcourse you need to getlose to the tank... how bout you
hjust fire a ballistic missile from your basement bunker like they do
nowadays? the soldiers in WW1 and WW2 had balls, unlike nowadays

Автор unltd679 ( назад)
it is meant to be fired under the armpit indeed

Автор Redsteak ( назад)
I've always wondered if the RPG-7 was inspired by this panzerfaust. I have
always like them, and I even own a life size replica of one. As for the way
it's fired, yes it is meant to be held under the armpit, I'm pretty sure
the instructions on the weapon say that...

Автор ingwar68 ( назад)
simple show :(

Автор Michael Röder ( назад)
the sight wasnt made for it. so not really easier......

Автор Boy Rich ( назад)
wow.. great video.. loved the sound effects

Автор Charlie (1376 лет назад)
there is a difference between panzerfaust and panzerschreck!

Автор Michael Röder ( назад)
BULLSHIT!redDL89 is right!. NOBODY fired it out of the shoulder! it was
fired below the armpit u are right man. stupid kids

Автор dazzlehammer88 ( назад)
or playing Call of Duty.

Автор ImprobableDrive ( назад)
Unless you're playing Wolfenstein, then it's ALWAYS a good idea.

Автор retrakkt ( назад)
Cool

Автор camwizardoz ( назад)
i think you generalizing RPG as the Russian RPGs. RPG is simply defined as
rocket propelled grenade, that doesn't mena that it has to be reusable.

Автор Moredread25 ( назад)
My German uncle told me that when he was a kid he used to go camping with
his friends in the forest oustside of Stutgart where the German army had
walked into near the end of the war and left all of their weapons. He took
a panzerfaust shell and threw it into a fire. It blew up.

Автор redDL89 ( назад)
isnt the panzerfaust tube suppose to be held below the armpit? or is that
just for close range attack?

Автор Bydlo ( назад)
probably not a very good idea to use a panzerfaust in a building

Автор Terpentino ( назад)
das stimmt allerdings. habe ich auch nachgelesen. da waren die amis uns ja
wenigstens einmal voraus :-)

Автор Negra Tron ( назад)
The 'schreck was an RPG even though it had no rocket in the round, a
recoilless rifle has a rifled bore and typically would use a smaller round
I'm sure (the 'schreck used an 88mm). The panzerfaust used a rocket to
propel the round though. Anyway this video is the shit.

Автор Big Black Guy (3 года назад)
rpg are resuseable u can put more rounds

Автор SnAKeoMan (330 лет назад)
and the panzerschreck comes from germany / austria too and panzerschreck is
not froma ny otjher country it was build from germany/austria.... and
bazooka from ....

Автор SnAKeoMan (444 года назад)
haha german pwnage i a mfrom AUSTRIA it is next to germany and i say you
austria have some good Panzerfaust´s too DEUTSCHLAND FTW wuhuu ich liebe es
nicht den krieg die waffe !!!

Автор john gotti ( назад)
It was a defensive weapon, you idiot. If you were in t foxhole or building
and a tank was coming at your position, you would be lucky to have a
Panzerfaust.

Автор Instinct42 ( назад)
Lmaox is right RPG's arent technically termed Recoilless rilfes. AT-4 and
panzerfausts would be the right weapons to be Termed.

Автор Instinct42 ( назад)
Rpg's were based on the Panzerfaust Fener4e dummie. When we looked into
Soviet files we found out their Rpg-1 were actually captured german
panzerfausts. and they copied the german idea of panzerfaust. "cheap and
very effective man-portable, anti-tank, fire and toss away weapon"

Автор killingamps ( назад)
No, the 'faust and the bazooka were totally different. The M1 Bazooka was
mostly ineffective, as the US designers did not understand how a HEAT round
should be shaped for best penetration. The Germans had this down pat, and a
'faust could take out any tank up to a JS-1. The panzerschreck was even
better.

Автор sgfhk321 ( назад)
You are thinking the PanzerSchreck.

Автор nfoo ( назад)
I thought Panzerfaust was based of the US Bazooka, which the Nazis captured
and improved ... just asking ...

Автор Chibling ( назад)
It amazes me how much of current tech is based on what the Nazi's designed
over 60 years ago...

Автор fener4e ( назад)
Actually the architype of all modern RPGs- RPG(1)7 is functionally based
upon the principle of dynamo reactive launch.And it was the Panzerfaust
where this principle was introduced first.

Автор fortvaux ( назад)
The RPG and the Panzerfaust have completely different designs. The concept
of a man-portable anti-tank launcher might be the same but they work in
different ways. And of course it has no rifling. But it´s still a
recoilless rifle. Read some books about it...

Автор Negra Tron ( назад)
The Panzerfaust is what all future RPGs were based from. It has no rifling
in the bore, either.

Автор fortvaux ( назад)
It actualy is a recoilles rifle. I know the word rifle is giving a wrong
impression. But the difference between the RPG and the Panzerfaust is that
the RPGs warhead has a rocket motor whereas the warhead of the Panzerfaust
has a powder charge behind it. When you fire the Panzerfaust the charge is
ignited and just like at a rifle the projectile is fired forwards. The RPG
in contrary has a rocket motor that keeps fastening the warhead forwards.
Although they might look similiar they work different

Автор Negra Tron ( назад)
'it's a recoilless rifle' You must be fucking stupid, it's an RPG. There's
no rifling or a bullet, it's a goddamn shaped charge warhead.

Автор shishkanadargf ( назад)
your excused

Автор AValidMember ( назад)
The panzerfaust fires hollow explosive charges. There is NO recoil because
the projectile's recoil energy is being equalized by the reversed gas
energy. what's so hard to understand..just watch the tube vids and you will
see that there is no recoil

Автор Magni56 ( назад)
Erm, no. The Schreck was a rocket-based weapon, not a recoilless rifle.
Raketenpanzerbüchse 54. Oh, Wikipedia quote time: "The Panzerfaust (plural:
Panzerfäuste, "armored fist" or "tank fist") was an inexpensive, recoilless
German anti-tank weapon of World War II."

Автор AValidMember ( назад)
you are probably mixing up panzerfaust and panzerschreck which are diffent
weapons

Автор Magni56 ( назад)
Seems like my sources say something differrent. As if it even matterred.
The thing was classed as a recoilless rifle in military nomenclature
anyway, no mater how sensical or unsensical that is. And that
warhead-jet-dispersion bit is now really retarded. Seems like the freakin
russians with their shoulder-launched at-weaponry as well as anyone else
designing such stuff disagreee here.

Автор Magni56 ( назад)
It was called a recoilless rifle. A small rifling at the end of the tube
gave the warhead a spin upon lauch to increase accuracy.

Автор landsknechte ( назад)
Okay... Call it a recoilless gun, instead of a rifle. Still, the basic
principle remains the same.

Автор Konstantinescu (1466 лет назад)
great. nice video. thanks so much because i was so confused about the
panzerfaust kept readin about it and seeing it in games but didnt know how
it works so i needed to see it in action. thanks.

Автор petrwarry ( назад)
nice one mate.i've seen "ZIZKA" T34 so was it filmed in Czech Rep.?

Автор g36c1 ( назад)
okas

Автор landsknechte ( назад)
It may have been designed that way to get the proper arc for the
projectile. The Panzerfaust was a recoilless rifle, not a rocket launcher.
It may have needed to be "lobbed" to get a decent range. I dunno. I assume
that the folks that designed them and used them in battle would have
switched to a shoulder position if that worked better. The Panzerschreck
was fired over the shoulder like a bazooka, so obviously the concept wasn't
alien to them.

Автор g36c1 ( назад)
why??

Автор landsknechte ( назад)
The aiming would have been done the same either way, aligning the sight
aperture with the top edge of the projectile. Honestly, I'm not sure why
the textbook method was under the arm, but it was the textbook method.

Автор landsknechte ( назад)
It's supposed to be tucked -under- the arm, not held over the shoulder like
a bazooka.

Автор g36c1 ( назад)
with that weapon kill many sherman s crews

Автор ImperialGuard9001 ( назад)
This footage is from where?

Автор Magni56 ( назад)
The Faust was quite able to penetrate any tank in WWII. And while the entry
hole is rather small, the entire crew gets basically shredded by fragments
of the tanks armor flying around inside. So when a crew feels that impact,
there isn´t really much left to do.

Автор panzerfaust95 ( назад)
Bellissimo!

Вставка видео:

URL 
Ссылка 

Поиск Видео

Top Видео

Top 100 >>>

Видео

Seo анализ сайта